PDA

View Full Version : Is the FDA founded in it's warning on eating fish?


bluehorizonx10
Dec 26th, 2003, 10:58 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,106703,00.html

The FDA is issuing women three rules for eating fish during pregnancy. But do they really make sense in the end?

“Do no eat shark, swordfish, king mackerel or tilefish because they contain high levels of mercury,” is the FDA’s first rule.

“Levels of mercury in other fish can vary. You can safely eat up to 12 ounces (two to three meals) of other purchased fish and shellfish per week. Mix up the types of fish and shell fish you eat and do not eat the same type of fish and shellfish more than once a week,” warns the FDA’s second rule.

The third FDA rule reads, “Check local advisories about the safety of fish caught by family and friends in your local rivers and streams. If no advice is available, you can safely eat up to 6 ounces (one meal) per week of fish you catch from local waters, but don’t consume any other fish during that week.”

And I ask is it really worth eating fish during pregnancy after reading this?!

AJlicious
Dec 27th, 2003, 12:42 PM
With all that there saying there really is no use to eat fish when your pregant.

bluehorizonx10
Dec 27th, 2003, 06:15 PM
Except.......they say fish is an important part of our diet and should be eaten. It's very confusing to say the least.

Java
Jan 26th, 2004, 02:16 PM
I wonder where so much mercury came from to pollute the entire oceans enough to make shark, swordfish, or king mackerel so poisonous now? That's a lot of mercury from somewhere!