PDA

View Full Version : Star magazing not to feature Britney on the cover for a while


Marina
Jan 20th, 2004, 05:51 PM
I was listening to KIIS FM this morning and Rick Dees was talking about how all the fans are sick of seeing Britney on the cover of every tabloid (or something like that) so Star magazine agreed not to put her on the cover for a while. I hope more magazines would do this. Not in a bad way, to just leave her alone for a bit.

Rickyluv21
Jan 21st, 2004, 09:46 AM
Yes, those bastards need to leave her alone. I cannot believe the would even agree to leave britney alone being that is how those mags make money. But I am glad they will lay off of her.

nmpv4176
Jan 23rd, 2004, 12:25 AM
Tabloids always like to show the star of the moment on their covers. Last year it was J Lo on them a lot. This time, Britney has been on it and because of that wedding fiasco, I think her management decided for them not to put her on their covers. But really, it's kind of stagnant and slow right now; no one main star standing out at the moment.

gameboy
Jan 23rd, 2004, 12:13 PM
Originally posted by Rickyluv21
Yes, those bastards need to leave her alone. I cannot believe the would even agree to leave britney alone being that is how those mags make money. But I am glad they will lay off of her.
Totally agree

DiRrTy_sLaVe_4U
Jan 23rd, 2004, 07:10 PM
T4P!! ;)

aShLeY AnN
Jan 24th, 2004, 08:45 PM
whats the point of the crotch picture anyways?

Marina
Jan 24th, 2004, 09:27 PM
Originally posted by aShLeY AnN
whats the point of the crotch picture anyways?

what? lmao where did THAT come from?

Mike v2.0
Jan 24th, 2004, 09:41 PM
Originally posted by DiRrTy_sLaVe_4U
T4P!! ;)