PDA

View Full Version : Cnn: Does Sex Still Sell?


beutifulstrangr
Jan 24th, 2004, 07:55 PM
Music stars bare more, sell less, but old habits die hard

Christina vamps like a burlesque stripper. Britney's gone from schoolgirl to slut. Pink is punk.

Many of music's reigning divas are partying like it's 1999, even though the world has become a darker, more uncertain and more anxious place since September 11, 2001. With the economy in a funk and record sales down for three years running, even established artists are sexing it up -- no doubt encouraged by edgy industry executives. The problem is, the public just doesn't seem to be in the mood for it, and the recent mediocre album sales by Spears, Pink and similar artists may reflect a classic case of mismarketing.

"When social and economic times are more threatening and pessimistic, we actually prefer others with more mature facial, body and personality characteristics," says Terry Pettijohn, a Ph.D. social psychologist at Mercyhurst College in Erie, Pennsylvania. If Pettijohn's observations are accurate, then industry executives who are pushing artists to "tart it up" are miscalculating the market and could be damaging careers.

"Audiences are listening to lyrics more," says Ron Vos, president/chief executive of Hi Frequency Marketing in North Carolina. "They're focused on content and story line, not dancing and having fun, and they want the artist to reflect that."

Indeed, female artists who are succeeding on the radio and on the charts have tapped into the nation's post-September 11 soul-searching.
Vos, whose firm worked with Avril Lavigne and Norah Jones, says these artists are writing music that's about being in touch with your values. They portray themselves as self-made people who write about their feelings, he says.

'You sell yourself, and I just hate it'

Sex certainly sells. The concept has been around as long as advertising. But Lavigne and Jones reflect a different kind of sexuality that's much subtler, more genuine and thus more alluring in a time of crisis. Given the national mood, such nuances could easily be the difference between strong and mediocre sales. One of the hottest breakthrough groups of last year, rock band Evanescence, is fronted by Amy Lee, who is appalled by the crass marketing of some pop stars. "Talking bad about Britney is like beating a dead horse; I won't even go there," she says. But what really bothers Lee are female artists who are good writers or good singers but have gone from being "really classy and cool to just stripping it all away." Jewel, for example, has gone from folk songstress to cover girl, and 40-something Sheryl Crow struts onstage in hot pants even as she bemoans that other artists are being marketed like "porn stars."

"Obviously, sex is the most basic thing that you can sell," Lee says. "I mean, you sell yourself, and I just hate it." From Spears' kiss with Madonna at the MTV Video Music Awards to Pink's onstage antics at the Billboard Music Awards, the trend toward trampiness shows no signs of abating.

But some academic research suggests that it runs counter to current economic, social and demographic trends. Last spring, Pettijohn and University of Georgia professor Abraham Tesser presented a paper to the American Psychological Society in Atlanta that examined how the social and economic environment affects human preferences. "In times of trouble, strong, stable, supportive people are favored," he says. "When times are good, we tend to favor the fun person."
To reach that conclusion, the researchers studied the public's preferences for actresses between 1932 and 1995. Individuals preferred smaller eyes, thinner cheeks and larger chins in bad times, and women with larger eyes, fuller cheeks and smaller chins in good times, the study found.

"The U.S. is always going back and forth between our puritan values and our need for indulgences," says Sharon Livingston of the Livingston Group, a Windham, New Hampshire, marketing and research firm.

'A turn toward traditional values'

Currently, songs with a mellow, introspective approach are finding a receptive U.S. audience, in part because of the confusion and sense of change in the wake of September 11, according to Ball State University pop culture expert Richard Aquila. That mood plays into the resurgence of the singer/songwriter, where audiences are eager to hear what the individual has to say, he says. "There's been a turn toward traditional values," Aquila adds. Alicia Keys is representative of the trend. Her songs are introspective and soulful. Her image, while sexual, also exudes strength and character. Not surprisingly, her latest album is doing well on the charts.

Norah Jones is sexy, Livingston says. But "she's using libido in a gentle way and talking about relationships. It's a more constructive use of her libido, but she's still creating interest and intrigue." She's saying, "'Come be with me, and you'll feel good about yourself,"' she explains.

Spears, of course, has played the sex card most often and most blatantly in the face of declining sales. Her biggest single, "... Baby One More Time," cut when her image was more wholesome, spent 39 weeks on the singles charts in 1998, including seven weeks in the top spot. Her last single to hit No. 1 on the charts was "I'm a Slave 4 U" in 2001. It spent one week at the top.

Despite massive hype, Spears' latest album is posting only so-so sales. And Pink's latest release is suffering as well. Sales of "Try This" have fallen far short of her previous blockbuster album. According to a source, her label is privately worried that she has been tarting it up too much. For her part, Pink says artists are just using what they've got.

"I don't think there's anything wrong with being sexy, but people use what they have," she says. "If people have a great voice, then you use your voice; if you have a great mind, then you speak a lot; if you have a great body, then you take your clothes off."

That may work if you're 20-something, but Evanescence's Lee isn't the only person who finds the trend disturbing among such established, talented female artists as Toni Braxton, Liz Phair and LeAnn Rimes.

Gina Vivinetto, pop music critic for Florida's St. Petersburg Times, noted in an article last summer that it's as if someone had issued a memo to every woman in rock. "No matter how seriously she once took herself, no matter how good her voice or her level of talent, she must start looking like a tramp."

Source: CNN
Posted by Ruben

I had the EXACT same things in mind while developing WoBx. The whole selling of sex is just becoming way too superficial. People out there miss the old warm feeling they used to get when they could connect with an artist in a real level. There's way too much sleeze out there, and the competition about who's the most controversial is clearly shown. I think that 2004 will be a year when "Sex" in that sense will become way too overrated. It doesn't matter what subject it is, if TV would start showing porn 24/7 and it would be the only thing you'd watch, I bet you would eventually get tired of it and go seek the opposite. Our minds are always going in the opposite direction when we get enough of something. Just think about it.

aShLeY AnN
Jan 24th, 2004, 08:38 PM
i completely agree actually, i think it's getting ridiculous..i dont understand why concerts and videos and everything else revolves around how many skany outfit changes they can do in one set..i mean what happened to the music? i guess it's just the pop genre, the music isnt good enough to listen to, so the clothes must come off.

Marina
Jan 24th, 2004, 08:44 PM
I do believe that it's a little over the top right now. I mean don't get me wrong, Britney is beautiful and has an amazing body, but mystery is more sexy. The only thing that I'm worrying about is how Christina bounced back after Dirrty, totally reinventing herself with every new single and video. Britney just has the same kind of look in ever video she does: sexy. If it were up to me, it would stay that way because I do not mind looking at that girl, I just don't think it's helping her career. I really hope she can recover from whatever is going on right now in the music industry.

shanilia
Jan 24th, 2004, 09:14 PM
Thanks for the article. It's about time someone acknowledged the respected introspective music that's out these days. I was afraid singers like Justin Timberlake, Beyonce, Britney, Christina, etc. were going to rule the music spotlight until they die.

I don't understand how the public resounds that there is too much sex in music right now, yet singers like Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera still head in the opposite direction and are getting worse and worse and yet are still popular. First, Britney with "I'm a Slave 4 U." Then it was Christina with "Dirrty."

Mike v2.0
Jan 24th, 2004, 09:36 PM
Thanks.

howied_lover
Jan 25th, 2004, 12:18 AM
Im completely thrilled with articles like this. Thanks for posting.

Nothing2Lose
Jan 25th, 2004, 01:19 AM
I think it has lost its effect. Its not as shocking (if it was intended to be) and it has, as I said earlier, lost its affect.

I think that Christina has calmed down, she is going in a different direction and with Britney it seems to be what she practically does. Not dissing her in any way. That has worked for her but I think it has lost its affect.

I think it hasn't reached its peak with the sex being shown but its getting close. Its not just music; its television, magazines, etc.. Its everywhere you look.

I just miss some of the substance. What can you do with society these days though?

Thanks for posting Safa! Its all interesting!

lalala
Jan 25th, 2004, 09:59 AM
Christina is getting out of that skanky phase but unfortunalty britney is still in it.

aShLeY AnN
Jan 25th, 2004, 12:46 PM
i think they are both still skanky lookin

Igloo
Jan 25th, 2004, 05:06 PM
It's funny how these articles focus only on the females.

Nothing2Lose
Jan 25th, 2004, 06:18 PM
Originally posted by Igloo
It's funny how these articles focus only on the females.

Good point. But you know really, sex is always going to sell no matter what.

beutifulstrangr
Jan 25th, 2004, 07:00 PM
You guys are all welcome.. some of you guys even had good points!

nmpv4176
Jan 25th, 2004, 09:40 PM
Sex still sells. But some female singers shouldn't try to change their images just to get even with Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera. Jewel should never have changed her look, but she said that she felt bored with the torn jeans look. Britney and Christina changed their looks to get out of the safe teen-pop label they were formerly on. Not to sound sexist, but it's to appeal to young men in their late 20s and 30s who like to read Playboy and ogle over the women's sexy looks and bare midriffs. And showing their bodies is what pulls them in. I see it a lot--they crave onto this sex stuff a lot. It's all an attempt to sell albums if they push that sexy image out there. But there's a time to do it, and a time not to. I don't think that Christina and Britney are going to change any time soon, they'll still get away with it in their 30s and 40s just like Madonna is still doing now.

ihsflagiechick
Jan 25th, 2004, 10:35 PM
i agree that sex sells, and it is going over the top, but we cant do anything to stop britney and christina and every other female pop artist that is 'stripping' their clothes off. we have no control over that. and i agree that im more into lyrics instead of the dancing ect..but i still LOVE the dancing ect. but now i pay more attention to the lyrics, and i really listen to the content and story line. anyways...i can see what they are saying.

Diva4230
Jan 25th, 2004, 10:46 PM
Sex sells, but their are various forms of sex appeal..

Christina and Britney are comfortable with being naughty.. And showing loads of skin.. If they have the confidence to do it, then do it..

That works for them.. We know they are comfortable with it..

The sexy thing doesn't work for Jessica Simpson because we know how uncomfortable she feels trying to be in a skimpy outfit on stage and so forth..

Norah Jones is sexy but in a different way.. Her music is sensual..