View Full Version : Britney just won a Grammy
NYCBSBFAN
Feb 13th, 2005, 05:24 PM
She won for Best Dance Recording.
gameboy
Feb 13th, 2005, 05:42 PM
yay!
Her first one
lol
hell yeah
SmartButPsycho
Feb 13th, 2005, 05:53 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! too all the losers who ever doubted her, SUCK ON THAT!!!!!
North Star
Feb 13th, 2005, 05:58 PM
Congratulations Britney Spears. You are no longer Britney Spears. You are now known as Grammy Award Winner, Britney Spears. That felt so good saying that.
mooch5
Feb 13th, 2005, 06:03 PM
congrats to her
X-tInA-FrEaKII
Feb 13th, 2005, 06:40 PM
was she there?
Bit-Bit
Feb 13th, 2005, 06:49 PM
No she wasn't but damn! She's amazing! Grammy Award Winner, Britney Spears! It does feel good saying that. Now we can add that award to her ever growing list of awards she's won! :)
SmartButPsycho
Feb 13th, 2005, 06:51 PM
No she wasn't but damn! She's amazing! Grammy Award Winner, Britney Spears! It does feel good saying that. Now we can add that award to her ever growing list of awards she's won! :)
damn straight! it's a very well deserved award and i'm happy for her. go britney :)
xtina hump alot
Feb 13th, 2005, 06:55 PM
omgggggggg! I almost died!!! She won holy cow!!! Now what they gonna say! Now what haters! ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!! True talent pays off.
X-tInA-FrEaKII
Feb 13th, 2005, 07:16 PM
it still sucks dat she won and seh was not there!
rljl20
Feb 13th, 2005, 07:34 PM
where did you get that information? according to yahoo this person won that category?
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/050214/ids_photos_en/r3365237250.jpg&e=3&ncid=707
SmartButPsycho
Feb 13th, 2005, 07:47 PM
http://grammys.com/awards/grammy/47winners.aspx#02
READ IT AND WEEP.
rljl20
Feb 13th, 2005, 07:50 PM
why would the picture lie? was there a tie?
SmartButPsycho
Feb 13th, 2005, 08:27 PM
i don't know!
who are you going to believe? YAHOO.com or the OFFICIAL GRAMMY'S WEBSITE?
daddyslittlegirl
Feb 13th, 2005, 08:29 PM
Toxic deserved it. I am very glad 4 her. Congratulations!!! :)
rachel green
Feb 13th, 2005, 08:41 PM
i'm really happy for her but i still think the Grammy's suck.
RIZINGSTAR986
Feb 13th, 2005, 08:50 PM
thank the Lord she won it in Dance recording and not in a vocal category. whoo. hat would have been scary.
Hantuchova Fan
Feb 13th, 2005, 09:32 PM
YAY britney!
Gregory Hawk
Feb 13th, 2005, 09:47 PM
lol. now i know the grammy's lost it. =P
at least she didn't win for her talent, but catchiness.
she deserves it though. she's been in it longer than 3/4 of the nominees.
Bit-Bit
Feb 13th, 2005, 10:17 PM
thank the Lord she won it in Dance recording and not in a vocal category. whoo. hat would have been scary.
(For solo, duo, group or collaborative performances. Vocal or Instrumental. Singles or tracks only.)
That's funny considering they took into account the overall vocals, production, instumental. :cool: Yeah so your comment was just shot down the drain. :rolleye2: :laugh:
Bit-Bit
Feb 13th, 2005, 10:21 PM
lol. now i know the grammy's lost it. =P
at least she didn't win for her talent, but catchiness.
she deserves it though. she's been in it longer than 3/4 of the nominees.Some people never cease to amaze me. Why do you have to bring her down? :scratch: A grammy is still a grammy. Now that she has the Grammy and the record sales the haters can never say she has no talent. The committee picked her for a reason. It takes more than a catchy song to win. She's got one and you don't. :laugh:
Britboy22
Feb 13th, 2005, 10:35 PM
very well deserve Britney..finally the girl is a Grammy winner...I am so happy for her
Debra_Dreams
Feb 13th, 2005, 10:45 PM
Awwww thats very awesome
Congrats to Britney
I'm very happy for her
johnwayne
Feb 13th, 2005, 11:31 PM
Its about time. She should have beat Christinas ass in 99 and Christina should have beat Beyonces ass in 2003. Oh well Im never gonna agree with these awards cos they dont like pop music anyway. :mad:
webjunkiejr
Feb 14th, 2005, 12:11 AM
I doubt Britney's critics will be silenced much since it isn't a major category Grammy. She didn't accept the award on television and didn't even attend. But she now doesn't have to hear the "never won a Grammy" tag anymore...
mikeTC111
Feb 14th, 2005, 12:17 AM
BTW, launch.com has Britney listed as the winner in the category... and launch is owned by yahoo (or affliated?)
http://launch.yahoo.com/promotions/grammys/
Moe
Feb 14th, 2005, 04:53 AM
ROTFL.. You guys make me laugh.. Not that I have anything against Britney but the grammy award does not GO TO HER.. It goes to the mixers/producers of "Toxic":
Avant & Bloodshy, producers; Niklas Flyckt, mixer
purpleangel
Feb 14th, 2005, 06:10 AM
Actually the award goes to her just like it went to Kylie last year and madonna in 1999
GRAMMY Winner Kylie Minogue, artist. Bruce Elliott-Smith, Cathy Dennis, Phil Larsen & Rob Davis, mixers. Cathy Dennis & Rob Davis, producers.
Genre Dance
GRAMMY Category Best Dance Recording
Year 2003 - 46th Annual GRAMMY Awards
Title of the Work Come Into My World
Artist Performing Work Kylie Minogue
so stop beeing such a bitter betty !
StayWithMe
Feb 14th, 2005, 07:21 AM
Reserved Spirit:
If the grammy doesnt go to her then why was it HER NAME they used when she was nominated?
LOL!
And bitbit:
I am loving you right now!
Mystic Man
Feb 14th, 2005, 07:43 AM
i'm really happy for her but i still think the Grammy's suck.
Same here. Never been a big fan of the Grammys (I know it is supposed to be the most prestigious music awards ceremony blah blah blah) and her winning is not going to make me like her any more. It's just not a big deal to me that she won.
and Christina should have beat Beyonces ass in 2003
Now I do agree with this. Beyonce picking up awards at every show in 2003 ticked me off big time.
ROTFL.. You guys make me laugh.. Not that I have anything against Britney but the grammy award does not GO TO HER.. It goes to the mixers/producers of "Toxic":
Avant & Bloodshy, producers; Niklas Flyckt, mixer
Sorry to disappoint you, but the Grammy does go to her. I know this because a few months AFTER Kylie won her award, she was on the radio talking about how the Grammy went to her because she was the one who performed the song, she made a joke about how she was going to split it in half with the produers or something. She also talked about how it was the most important thing she had won and how it was sitting on her mantle piece blah blah.
britneyfan
Feb 14th, 2005, 08:02 AM
omg omg omg omg britney won a grammy i am so happy!
mr_tfasho
Feb 14th, 2005, 08:33 AM
It's funny how some of you said you didn't care about the grammies at first, but as soon as britney wins Best Dance recording, you are all happy. Good for her. And about time. Though I am happy she only won in this silly category. She doesn't need to win a big award like vocals or best new artist because she can't really sing, and she lyp- sings too much. Just my opinion. But good for you guys and her. :)
Gregory Hawk
Feb 14th, 2005, 08:33 AM
Some people never cease to amaze me. Why do you have to bring her down? :scratch: A grammy is still a grammy. Now that she has the Grammy and the record sales the haters can never say she has no talent. The committee picked her for a reason. It takes more than a catchy song to win. She's got one and you don't. :laugh:First of all, I could of sworn I said that she deserved it.
And you know it's a fact too: Britney doesn't have as much of a vocal talent as other Grammy nominees (aka Alicia Keys, Beyonce, Norah Jones)
All I'm saying is that she didn't get an award for "Best Pop Vocal by a Female" kind of award or anything. Just an award for a dance record.
And I don't see yourself winning a Grammy anytime soon ...
Oh. And we *CAN* still make fun of Britney's talent. Milli Vanilli had a grammy and the record sales. And they proved to be untalented .... :crazy:
SmartButPsycho
Feb 14th, 2005, 09:27 AM
Britney won her grammy in a VOCAL performance category, therefore, she gets a grammy, as well as recognition for her vocals in the song.
so anyone who is too blind to see that can suck on my left nut.
daddyslittlegirl
Feb 14th, 2005, 09:32 AM
Britney won her grammy in a VOCAL performance category, therefore, she gets a grammy, as well as recognition for her vocals in the song.
so anyone who is too blind to see that can suck on my left nut.
LOL @ "sucking on my left nut."
mr_tfasho
Feb 14th, 2005, 10:04 AM
LOL! How do you get vocal from dance recording? SHe won because there was no competition and because the song makes you dance. Maybe she should learn how to sing if she wan'ts to win something for her voice. And besides, her award didn't even air on t.v.
Chaz On Toast
Feb 14th, 2005, 10:08 AM
I'm still happy she won a Grammy, in what she does best. :)
~HoneyRain~
Feb 14th, 2005, 10:38 AM
Congrats to Britney
Chi^_^
Feb 14th, 2005, 10:53 AM
(For solo, duo, group or collaborative performances. Vocal or Instrumental. Singles or tracks only.)
That's funny considering they took into account the overall vocals, production, instumental. :cool: Yeah so your comment was just shot down the drain. :rolleye2: :laugh:
Do you have trouble understanding written text? The quote you selected specifies the category the music can originate from. e.g. "Dance Tacks" that have the potential to be nominated can be a solo, duo, group, collaborative, vocal or instrumental. These are not criteria for which the song is judged on -- otherwise, how can Toxic be solo, group, duo, collaborative, instrumental, and vocal at the same time?
Think people.
Vocals just mean the song has a vocal track. Not that it's recognized for its vocals. If vocals were important for this category, it wouldn't be considered an optional implementation to be recognized as a nominee.
daddyslittlegirl
Feb 14th, 2005, 11:03 AM
Do you have trouble understanding written text? The quote you selected specifies the category the music can originate from. e.g. "Dance Tacks" that have the potential to be nominated can be a solo, duo, group, collaborative, vocal or instrumental. These are not criteria for which the song is judged on -- otherwise, how can Toxic be solo, group, duo, collaborative, instrumental, and vocal at the same time?
Think people.
Vocals just mean the song has a vocal track. Not that it's recognized for it's vocals.
Isn't that 4 the Best Pop Vocal Grammy???
Chi^_^
Feb 14th, 2005, 11:06 AM
Isn't that 4 the Best Pop Vocal Grammy???
Best Dance Recording
(For solo, duo, group or collaborative performances. Vocal or Instrumental. Singles or tracks only.)
* Toxic
Britney Spears
Avant & Bloodshy, producers; Niklas Flyckt, mixer
Track from: In The Zone
[Jive/Zomba Label Group]
No, it's not.
daddyslittlegirl
Feb 14th, 2005, 11:20 AM
No, it's not.
No, I meant that there is one that is specifically 4 pop vocal, right? So they would consider this a dance song right??
Chi^_^
Feb 14th, 2005, 11:42 AM
No, I meant that there is one that is specifically 4 pop vocal, right? So they would consider this a dance song right??
Yes, they have several pop vocal categories -- this one is purely a dance track. So you're right, this is for a dance track only.
Best Female Pop Vocal Performance
(For a solo vocal performance. Singles or Tracks only.)
* Sunrise
Norah Jones
Track from: Feels Like Home
[Blue Note Records]
Category 6
Best Male Pop Vocal Performance
(For a solo vocal performance. Singles or Tracks only.)
* Daughters
John Mayer
Track from: Heavier Things
[Aware Records/Columbia]
Best Pop Vocal Album
(For albums containing 51% or more playing time of VOCAL tracks.)
* Genius Loves Company
Ray Charles & Various Artists
[Concord Records/Hear Music]
Best Traditional Pop Vocal Album
(For albums containing 51% or more playing time of VOCAL tracks.)
* Stardust...The Great American Songbook Volume III
Rod Stewart
[J Records]
Field 4 — Rock
Category 15
Best Solo Rock Vocal Performance
(For a solo vocal performance. Singles or Tracks only.)
* Code Of Silence
Bruce Springsteen
Track from: The Essential Bruce Springsteen
[Columbia Records]
For any song to win for vocal recognition, the award states "Pop vocal/Vocal Performance".
The key word in Britney's grammy is "Best Dance Recording".
daddyslittlegirl
Feb 14th, 2005, 11:49 AM
Yes, they have several pop vocal categories -- this one is purely a dance track. So you're right, this is for a dance track only.
For any song to win for vocal recognition, the award states "Pop vocal/Vocal Performance".
The key word in Britney's grammy is "Best Dance Recording".
LOL @ them thinking that Genuis Loves Company is pop.
MishaandTonyBabe
Feb 14th, 2005, 11:53 AM
OMG i was laughing hysterically when i read that. Britney and Grammy shouldn't be on the same sentence, i thought only people with real talent won that award. But yeah her grammy isn't an important one and it doesn't even recognizes her as a good singer it just says that she has a song that can make you dance.
Chi^_^
Feb 14th, 2005, 11:58 AM
LOL @ them thinking that Genuis Loves Company is pop.
It's pop not in the sense that you recognize pop -- ala Britney teen era type pop. It's pop[ular] vocals. Like rnb pop, Punk Pop , etc. Every genre has a pop[ular] iteration that's considered to be "radio friendly" or have "mass appeal" in regards to its respective audience appeal.
.Zae.
Feb 14th, 2005, 12:04 PM
Didn't "Who Let The Dogs Out?" win this award previously? :crazy:
Black Velvet
Feb 14th, 2005, 12:14 PM
YAY!! she now has a Grammy, American Music Award and Billboard award. the three most prestigeous awards for music. CONGRATS!!
Diva4230
Feb 14th, 2005, 12:51 PM
I always knew if she won a Grammy it wouldn't be for the vocals.. It would be for Dance or for video..
Much like Paula Abdul's grammy.. Or most of Janet's..
purpleangel
Feb 14th, 2005, 12:55 PM
Didn't "Who Let The Dogs Out?" win this award previously? :crazy:
As did Madonna´s - "Ray of light"
:p
SmartButPsycho
Feb 14th, 2005, 01:27 PM
LOL! How do you get vocal from dance recording? SHe won because there was no competition and because the song makes you dance. Maybe she should learn how to sing if she wan'ts to win something for her voice. And besides, her award didn't even air on t.v.
whether or not the awards ceremony for her grammy aired on TV or not is irreleven being that she's still a winner. The Grammys only presented 11 awards on air, does that mean the others are less valued? no, don't think so.
FACE IT LOSERS....Britney won a grammy and you're all bitter because you never expected it to happen. Britney rules and you all suck. END OF DISCUSSSION.
arik
Feb 14th, 2005, 01:46 PM
:bunny: next year for videos and dance (http://www.queenbrintey.com)
http://www.queenbritney.com/thumb/Britney_Spears047_thumb.jpg (http://www.queenbritney.com/gallery/page_4_11.html) :bunny:
Alyric
Feb 14th, 2005, 02:49 PM
Oh gosh everyone shut up.
To the haterz a Grammy is a grammy no matter what. No she didnt win for vocals but its still a damn grammy and whether you hate her or not Toxic was a killer dance song.
To the luvers be happy Toxic was the best track on the cd, fast track I mean. No matter what Britney does until she releases her Ray of LIght album they will always hate her, and even after that she will still be hated.
jade.
Feb 14th, 2005, 02:57 PM
Its about time. She should have beat Christinas ass in 99 and Christina should have beat Beyonces ass in 2003. Oh well Im never gonna agree with these awards cos they dont like pop music anyway. :mad:
Don't bring your pathetic ass back to the Christina board, kthxbye.
Congrats to her, she deserves a Grammy for her 5 years in the industry.
ToxicFighter
Feb 14th, 2005, 04:59 PM
Oh gosh everyone shut up.
To the haterz a Grammy is a grammy no matter what. No she didnt win for vocals but its still a damn grammy and whether you hate her or not Toxic was a killer dance song.
To the luvers be happy Toxic was the best track on the cd, fast track I mean. No matter what Britney does until she releases her Ray of LIght album they will always hate her, and even after that she will still be hated.
I agree! A Grammy is a Grammy it doesnt change it's figure,shape and color. Everyone get's the same little trophy/trumpet? :confused::laugh: or whatever the hell it is even if you won for Record of the year. Congragulations Britney! Toxic is her best song ever and I knew this song was going to win a grammy. I'm pretty sure if the Grammy commitee would of nominate her for more categories she would of won as well. This is Toxic's first AWARD! Vma's ed her over, Ama's and Rma's screwed her over and didnt nominate the song not even ONCE! The BBA's didnt give Toxic and it was the biggest pop song of 2004. Well I guess it was all woth it :bunny:
Izzy89
Feb 14th, 2005, 06:03 PM
yay congrats to britney :)
Britina
Feb 14th, 2005, 06:14 PM
I think out of the nominees in that category, "Toxic" deserved to win.
~Edward~
Feb 14th, 2005, 06:39 PM
OMG you haters are so pathetic, Why post here if you're not a fan? :rolleye2:
Anyways a Grammy is a Grammy they all count the same, I mean out of a 100+ awards only 11 awards were broadcasted.
Britney deserved this award and should of been nominated for more, But Im still glad she won, Congrats Britney ! :cool:
mr_tfasho
Feb 14th, 2005, 07:20 PM
I so happy for Britney. I mean it is about time she wins something for her DANCE RECORDING talent. :sunny:
britneyfan
Feb 14th, 2005, 07:48 PM
Doesn't matter if you like Britney or hate britney she won a grammy and i happened to love her and it makes it so much better! But stop talking about her now if you don't like her don't post here it's that simple.
TouchOfMyHand
Feb 14th, 2005, 08:41 PM
BRAVO!! Who would've thought Britney would have a Grammy before a VMA?
Britney's "personality" definitely shines through in the song. SHE played a great part (along with the beats, strings, guitar, etc.) in making Toxic a hit, which is why she deserves the award.
Previous winners in the dance category (she's in great company).
2005: Britney Spears "Toxic"
2004: Kylie Minogue "Come Into My World"
2003: Dirty Vegas "Days Go By"
2002: Janet Jackson "All For You"
2001: Baha Men "Who Let The Dogs Out"
2000: Cher "Believe"
1999: Madonna "Ray Of Light"
1998: Donna Summer & Giorgio Moroder "Carry On"
Hopefully we will get a picture of her holding the trophy soon. :D
RIZINGSTAR986
Feb 15th, 2005, 08:27 AM
when all those other people won that category it was okay, but now that Britney won, it is being disputed...that just goes to show she just sux at life.
Mystic Man
Feb 15th, 2005, 09:10 AM
*edit* Nevermind. I can't be bothered lol.
Chi^_^
Feb 15th, 2005, 10:45 AM
You people suck at reading, seriously :)
The grammy was never disputed, it's the idea that some of you think she won because of her vocals or her writing contributions. AFAIA, she didn't write anything on Toxic, nor was the category specifically designed to focus on vocal skills. If anything, you're the ones using the Grammy to substantiate her talent when the award is actually for production value.
Bit-Bit
Feb 15th, 2005, 01:08 PM
It's funny how some of you said you didn't care about the grammies at first, but as soon as britney wins Best Dance recording, you are all happy. Good for her. And about time. Though I am happy she only won in this silly category. She doesn't need to win a big award like vocals or best new artist because she can't really sing, and she lyp- sings too much. Just my opinion. But good for you guys and her. :)We can still congratulate her but that doesn't mean most of us actually saw the Grammy's. I know I didn't. :laugh:
Bit-Bit
Feb 15th, 2005, 01:11 PM
First of all, I could of sworn I said that she deserved it.
And you know it's a fact too: Britney doesn't have as much of a vocal talent as other Grammy nominees (aka Alicia Keys, Beyonce, Norah Jones)
All I'm saying is that she didn't get an award for "Best Pop Vocal by a Female" kind of award or anything. Just an award for a dance record.
And I don't see yourself winning a Grammy anytime soon ...
Oh. And we *CAN* still make fun of Britney's talent. Milli Vanilli had a grammy and the record sales. And they proved to be untalented .... :crazy:I find it funny that some Christina fans said they have lost respect for the Grammy's when Britney won. Hello Milli Vanilli won back in the late 80's was it? and then Baha men won for Who Let THe Dogs Out. What did you have some sort of praise for them? Give me a break. She won it fair and square. Some you can't admit it because now that she's known as the Queen of pop, a grammy winner, the best female pop performer out there, and has the sales you still want to bash on her. Just leave already.
Bit-Bit
Feb 15th, 2005, 01:14 PM
LOL! How do you get vocal from dance recording? SHe won because there was no competition and because the song makes you dance. Maybe she should learn how to sing if she wan'ts to win something for her voice. And besides, her award didn't even air on t.v.
The fact that she's singing on the song obviously. Are you that stupid? Look at this again. When they announced the award it said this:
(For solo, duo, group or collaborative performances. Vocal or Instrumental. Singles or tracks only.)
Vocals, instrumental and overall production? Are you blind? seriously take a closer look it ain't that hard to understand buddy. :eek: :susp:
Bit-Bit
Feb 15th, 2005, 01:18 PM
OMG i was laughing hysterically when i read that. Britney and Grammy shouldn't be on the same sentence, i thought only people with real talent won that award. But yeah her grammy isn't an important one and it doesn't even recognizes her as a good singer it just says that she has a song that can make you dance.
Another person who is naive. So sad so sad. Wow what did you think when Milli Vanilli or baha men won grammies? Seriously stop contradicting yourself. You obviously are a hater but you obviously came in here (britney's forum) because like everyone else you are interested.
Chi^_^
Feb 15th, 2005, 01:28 PM
The fact that she's singing on the song obviously. Are you that stupid? Look at this again. When they announced the award it said this:
(For solo, duo, group or collaborative performances. Vocal or Instrumental. Singles or tracks only.)
Vocals, instrumental and overall production? Are you blind? seriously take a closer look it ain't that hard to understand buddy. :eek: :susp:
Bit-Bit doesn't know how to read :) Those are not considerations for why the award was given, it's a general guideline for the type of songs that can be allowed to be nominated. She's in denial, and probably has me on ignore because she doesn't like hearing the truth. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
daddyslittlegirl
Feb 15th, 2005, 01:37 PM
We can still congratulate her but that doesn't mean most of us actually saw the Grammy's. I know I didn't. :laugh:
It was actually a pretty good grammy's in terms of performances.
Bit-Bit
Feb 15th, 2005, 02:05 PM
Bit-Bit doesn't know how to read :) Those are not considerations for why the award was given, it's a general guideline for the type of songs that can be allowed to be nominated. She's in denial, and probably has me on ignore because she doesn't like hearing the truth. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:Sure buddy. What are you? like some grammy official? :laugh: You use the laughing way too much.
MishaandTonyBabe
Feb 15th, 2005, 02:39 PM
I'm contradicting myself becuase i said that the song make you dance, duh it wouldn't have been nominated for best dance recording if you couldn't dance it!. I didn't get to see all the grammys so i want it to see who had won an award and i check almost all boards, but when i saw the fact that britney had one won i thought it was hella funny.
Black Velvet
Feb 15th, 2005, 04:24 PM
You people suck at reading, seriously :)
The grammy was never disputed, it's the idea that some of you think she won because of her vocals or her writing contributions. AFAIA, she didn't write anything on Toxic, nor was the category specifically designed to focus on vocal skills. If anything, you're the ones using the Grammy to substantiate her talent when the award is actually for production value.
in this category the person singing (even if they aren't credited as a writer or producer) gets an actual grammy award for their contributions... meaning that every part of the recording is focused on (including vocals) at least to some extent... she may not have won specifically for her vocals as in the other categories but they did play a part in the overall judging of the song which means her talent did play a part in winning the grammy. so as fans we're entitled to celebrate that achievement. get over it.
Chi^_^
Feb 15th, 2005, 04:36 PM
Sure buddy. What are you? like some grammy official? :laugh: You use the laughing way too much.
Are you?
Damn, you can't seem to understand a word of english -- yet you like correcting people with it.
(For solo, duo, group or collaborative performances. Vocal or Instrumental. Singles or tracks only.)
Let me put set it straight with you, according to the way you interpret things (which is wrong, btw, just thought I'd let you know) -- "Toxic" would be winning an award for:
Best Solo and
Best Collaborative and
Best Group and
Best Duo and
Best Vocals and
Best Instrumental
Your powers of deductive reasoning must not be very great if you can't discern simple context.
Those listed above are simply categories for which a song can be nominated -- since you don't seem to understand that, and I've already explained it to you, let me make it simpler.
This means that a Dance Track can be nominated if it is a:
Solo Performance or
Duo Performance or
Collaborative Performance or
Group Performance or
Now, this might get a little complicated for you, but let me try to make it simple. The Vocal or Instrumental addition refers to the following choices:
Vocal Solo Performance or
Vocal Duo Performance or
Vocal Collaborative Performance or
Vocal Group Performance or
Instrumental Solo Performance or
Instrumental Duo Performance or
Instrumental Collaborative Performance or
Instrumental Group Performance
If a song can fit into these categories, provided that it falls under the musical genre of Dance Music, then it is elligible for an award nomination.
Was that so hard for you to think about, or are you happy with the fact that you practice a heavy dose of cognitive dissonance?
Diva4230
Feb 15th, 2005, 05:11 PM
I'm glad Toxic won something.. It's a great tune..
I was just stating.. I always knew if Britney won a Grammy, it'd be like most of Janet's or Paula's.. Being for the dance or for the video's..
You'd never expect any of them get like best female pop vocal or anything..
brit&janet4eva
Feb 15th, 2005, 05:14 PM
all the xtina fans that post her are obviously haters even though they are being in denial i'm very happy that britney won a grammy so happy
Diva4230
Feb 15th, 2005, 05:16 PM
I guess I'm in denial for saying I'm glad Toxic won..
Huh.. Who knew?
daddyslittlegirl
Feb 15th, 2005, 06:32 PM
I guess I'm in denial for saying I'm glad Toxic won..
Huh.. Who knew?
LOL!!!!!!!!
Chi^_^
Feb 15th, 2005, 09:13 PM
I'm glad Toxic won something.. It's a great tune..
I was just stating.. I always knew if Britney won a Grammy, it'd be like most of Janet's or Paula's.. Being for the dance or for the video's..
You'd never expect any of them get like best female pop vocal or anything..
Most people don't seem to understand this :) Toxic was a clear winner for dance track -- I just find it funny how some people try to make it out for more than what it is. It's not a song praising vocals -- it's overall production, but people get so bent out of shape when it comes to re-evaluating their posoition that they'd rather not think about at all and change the argument. =) You == cool
jimmyboy
Feb 15th, 2005, 09:23 PM
I think this is the kind of award Britney deserves, for dance songs, she must sing only that kind of songs,I don't think she will ever win an award for her vocals acrobatics or stuff, but this Grammy was not surprise for me.
SmartButPsycho
Feb 15th, 2005, 09:34 PM
a Grammy is a Grammy. PERIOD. the fact of the matter is she was recognized for something, so you all can go shave your backs now.
Gregory Hawk
Feb 15th, 2005, 09:51 PM
I find it funny that some Christina fans said they have lost respect for the Grammy's when Britney won. Hello Milli Vanilli won back in the late 80's was it? and then Baha men won for Who Let THe Dogs Out. What did you have some sort of praise for them? Give me a break. She won it fair and square. Some you can't admit it because now that she's known as the Queen of pop, a grammy winner, the best female pop performer out there, and has the sales you still want to bash on her. Just leave already.First and foremost, get your facts straight, I started getting disappointed of the Grammy's ever since the 2nd year I watched it. (I think that was in 2000).
She did win it fair and square. No doubt about it.
I have nothing against Britney winning the Grammy. I might have a problem with her, but not her winning the Grammy.
Like I said, she deserves it.
jimmyboy
Feb 15th, 2005, 09:56 PM
a Grammy is a Grammy. PERIOD. the fact of the matter is she was recognized for something, so you all can go shave your backs now.
I said she deserved it, she is good at dance songs, anyway she won it already, no reason to discuss about it, nothing we can say will change anything
Taurus
Feb 15th, 2005, 10:13 PM
What I don't understand is why not just leave these Britney fans, (I'll admit, I'm one too) alone? I mean seriously? If they're happy for Britney, let them be. I don't see why you need to come here and try to take their happiness away. You people seriously need to get a f-ing life. :o
arik
Feb 16th, 2005, 08:33 AM
congratulation...the first time grammy
christina's-girl
Feb 16th, 2005, 09:59 AM
People crack me up. Now that Brit's won a grammy for her over processed vocals on Toxic, without writing a lick of it, or using any vocal talent at all, and having other people produce it, her fans think that they and Britney are the . At least Christina wins for vocal talent. What can you say Brit won for? Showing up to the studio and moaning the words she was told to at the time she was told to?
Yeah, a grammy's a grammy, however, the grammy belongs to the people who made the track deserving of a grammy, and Britney isn't one of them.
And Taurus, no one's trying to take any happiness away. Some of us know that this is going to be shoved down our throats in the future, just like Britney's record sales and concert sales are, which also have nothing to do with talent. Now that "she" has won a grammy, oh hell, the 's gonna hit the fan now, and you won't be able to tell her fans anything...
Chaz On Toast
Feb 16th, 2005, 10:26 AM
People crack me up. Now that Brit's won a grammy for her over processed vocals on Toxic, without writing a lick of it, or using any vocal talent at all, and having other people produce it, her fans think that they and Britney are the . At least Christina wins for vocal talent. What can you say Brit won for? Showing up to the studio and moaning the words she was told to at the time she was told to?
Yeah, a grammy's a grammy, however, the grammy belongs to the people who made the track deserving of a grammy, and Britney isn't one of them.
And Taurus, no one's trying to take any happiness away. Some of us know that this is going to be shoved down our throats in the future, just like Britney's record sales and concert sales are, which also have nothing to do with talent. Now that "she" has won a grammy, oh hell, the 's gonna hit the fan now, and you won't be able to tell her fans anything...
Blah blah blah..
Actually, I think her voice MADE the song, the vocal arrangements, the style she gave to the verses, the CHORUS, the whispery effect given to it, I think she was fit for the song. Her voice just blended well into the song, she sounds pretty good too. Well, at least in "In the Zone" it's one of her best vocal tracks.
SmartButPsycho
Feb 16th, 2005, 10:29 AM
People crack me up. Now that Brit's won a grammy for her over processed vocals on Toxic, without writing a lick of it, or using any vocal talent at all, and having other people produce it, her fans think that they and Britney are the . At least Christina wins for vocal talent. What can you say Brit won for? Showing up to the studio and moaning the words she was told to at the time she was told to?
Yeah, a grammy's a grammy, however, the grammy belongs to the people who made the track deserving of a grammy, and Britney isn't one of them.
Just like how Linda Perry won a grammy and NOT Christina, right?
yeah, thats what i thought. now shut the up before i put you back in your hole.
christina's-girl
Feb 16th, 2005, 10:59 AM
Blah blah blah..
Actually, I think her voice MADE the song, the vocal arrangements, the style she gave to the verses, the CHORUS, the whispery effect given to it, I think she was fit for the song. Her voice just blended well into the song, she sounds pretty good too. Well, at least in "In the Zone" it's one of her best vocal tracks.
So if her voice made the song, why are there so many others out there that sound just like her? i.e. Lindsay Lohan.... and if her voice made the song, why does it always have to be digitally enhanced?
christina's-girl
Feb 16th, 2005, 11:01 AM
Just like how Linda Perry won a grammy and NOT Christina, right?
yeah, thats what i thought. now shut the up before i put you back in your hole.
Duh, Linda won a grammy, but Christina won a seperate for best VOCAL performance, dipstick. Shut my mouth? Can you not read the word VOCAL? You will never see that printed on a grammy for Britney.
That puts you back it your hole... up Britney's ass that is.
jade.
Feb 16th, 2005, 11:08 AM
Just like how Linda Perry won a grammy and NOT Christina, right?
yeah, thats what i thought. now shut the up before i put you back in your hole.
rofl. Who exactly do you think you are? :scratch:
Hey, Christina's got 4 Grammy's so you can complain all you like.
Chi^_^
Feb 16th, 2005, 12:15 PM
People crack me up. Now that Brit's won a grammy for her over processed vocals on Toxic, without writing a lick of it, or using any vocal talent at all, and having other people produce it, her fans think that they and Britney are the . At least Christina wins for vocal talent. What can you say Brit won for? Showing up to the studio and moaning the words she was told to at the time she was told to?
Yeah, a grammy's a grammy, however, the grammy belongs to the people who made the track deserving of a grammy, and Britney isn't one of them.
And Taurus, no one's trying to take any happiness away. Some of us know that this is going to be shoved down our throats in the future, just like Britney's record sales and concert sales are, which also have nothing to do with talent. Now that "she" has won a grammy, oh hell, the 's gonna hit the fan now, and you won't be able to tell her fans anything...
Bravo =)
blackrose79
Feb 16th, 2005, 02:16 PM
People crack me up. Now that Brit's won a grammy for her over processed vocals on Toxic, without writing a lick of it, or using any vocal talent at all, and having other people produce it, her fans think that they and Britney are the . At least Christina wins for vocal talent. What can you say Brit won for? Showing up to the studio and moaning the words she was told to at the time she was told to?
Yeah, a grammy's a grammy, however, the grammy belongs to the people who made the track deserving of a grammy, and Britney isn't one of them.
And Taurus, no one's trying to take any happiness away. Some of us know that this is going to be shoved down our throats in the future, just like Britney's record sales and concert sales are, which also have nothing to do with talent. Now that "she" has won a grammy, oh hell, the 's gonna hit the fan now, and you won't be able to tell her fans anything... well said.i agree.
PoisonParadise7
Feb 16th, 2005, 02:41 PM
Good for Britney, she(and the producers) deserve it. But damn, some of you people really need to get over it, why so bitter? It's a GRAMMY, plus she didn't even win in one of the main categories.
AdDiCtEd2XtInA
Feb 16th, 2005, 03:39 PM
congrats to brit! that song was hot....im glad she got reconnized 4 it!!!
Sunfire
Feb 16th, 2005, 04:24 PM
All of you Britney haters come across as very jealous, I hope you know that. Yes, I know you're not jealous, blah blah blah, but that's what it looks like.
I personally think that is exactly the kind of grammy Britney should win... for her dancing/performance. Not for her voice, because we all know (most of us, at least) that her voice isn't the strongest. Obviously has not stopped her, as she is very talented and gives off an awesome show. I'm glad she won, she deserved it.
britneyfan
Feb 16th, 2005, 04:26 PM
I think Britney has an amazing voice....but anyway get over the grammy now she won great move on and live your life.
jade.
Feb 16th, 2005, 05:04 PM
I think Britney has an amazing voice....but anyway get over the grammy now she won great move on and live your life.
Sorry, but how can you say she has an amazing voice when you can't tell because of all that computerized stuff that is put onto it. She certainly didn't sound amazing when she sung Everytime live.
Sunfire
Feb 16th, 2005, 05:31 PM
Sorry, but how can you say she has an amazing voice when you can't tell because of all that computerized stuff that is put onto it. She certainly didn't sound amazing when she sung Everytime live.
See, it's comments like that, that are really uncalled for. Obviously not everyone is going to have the same opinion. Who are you to say that she's not allowed to think that Britney has an amazing voice, just because YOU don't think so? And yeah, I know you didn't say that she's not allowed to think that, but that's basically what you're saying. It's not right. We are all allowed our opinions... but don't knock someone for theirs.
daddyslittlegirl
Feb 16th, 2005, 05:57 PM
See, it's comments like that, that are really uncalled for. Obviously not everyone is going to have the same opinion. Who are you to say that she's not allowed to think that Britney has an amazing voice, just because YOU don't think so? And yeah, I know you didn't say that she's not allowed to think that, but that's basically what you're saying. It's not right. We are all allowed our opinions... but don't knock someone for theirs.
True. :wink:
ToxicFighter
Feb 16th, 2005, 07:07 PM
What's the en point in arguing? Geezz you guys make me feel embarrassed of my two favorite artists :mad: First xtina fans, A grammy is a GRAMMY. Toxic deserved to win! Now that I look at the past I understand why Britney never won any grammys for her past albums. She doesnt' have a great voice like the rest she competed with, she's never going to win a Grammy in that department and I one of her biggest fans will admit that. Toxic won because it was well produced and was probably the best dance song of the year. It's vocals were better than any other song she was nominated in, that's why I think she won the Grammy. Kylie has a better voice imo and I en hate that b!tch but I know for a fact that Britney won because it was a great DANCE TUNE and it was the best out of all of em. Now Britney fans, I hate when you guys bring Xtina into this. How could you? You know Xtina has a better voice than Britney and she's won 4 grammys already all of em which she has picked up herself live on T.V. Cut it out you guys, this could go on forever and no one is going to prove anything. Just follow your favorite artist, dont come here if your not a Britney fan cuz seriously you guys look like haters which you are. We all know that Xtina cant dance as well as Britney and sell as much as Britney. We also know that Britney will never win the grammy's that Xtina has won in the past and that she'll never top Xtina's voice. To tell you the truth Xtina is smarter. I love Britney the most but she needs to keep her life private and not try to make it public all the time, which now that I think of it it's not really her fault becuase of course Britney Gets the most ATTENTION :love: you see? It's over.
Bit-Bit
Feb 17th, 2005, 02:25 AM
People crack me up. Now that Brit's won a grammy for her over processed vocals on Toxic, without writing a lick of it, or using any vocal talent at all, and having other people produce it, her fans think that they and Britney are the . At least Christina wins for vocal talent. What can you say Brit won for? Showing up to the studio and moaning the words she was told to at the time she was told to?
Yeah, a grammy's a grammy, however, the grammy belongs to the people who made the track deserving of a grammy, and Britney isn't one of them.
And Taurus, no one's trying to take any happiness away. Some of us know that this is going to be shoved down our throats in the future, just like Britney's record sales and concert sales are, which also have nothing to do with talent. Now that "she" has won a grammy, oh hell, the 's gonna hit the fan now, and you won't be able to tell her fans anything...I feel sorry for you because 1) You have come and posted on a artists forum you don't like 2) you're acting all jealous and 3) you're trying to say that Britney doesn't get her award? It was on her album they are her vocals. So if you really have a problem with her what are you doing here? and lastly I've said this time and time again is Christina not keeping you interested? Because you seem to love coming back here. Anyway it doesn't change the fact that after Britney was declared a Grammy winner, some of you Christina fans got your panties in all tied up. It's funny now because you know why? Britney's got the awards, the sales, 4 #1 albums, the movies coming up, a happy marriage, the music, the fans, the sold out tours, endorsements (perfume) which will be making her probably over a cool $50-70 million once all said and done. It's on track to have sales of over $1 billion. Who wouldn't wanna celebrate that? :scratch: :laugh: :cool: :blueeek:
profoundfool
Feb 17th, 2005, 02:30 AM
All of you Britney haters come across as very jealous, I hope you know that. Yes, I know you're not jealous, blah blah blah, but that's what it looks like.
I personally think that is exactly the kind of grammy Britney should win... for her dancing/performance. Not for her voice, because we all know (most of us, at least) that her voice isn't the strongest. Obviously has not stopped her, as she is very talented and gives off an awesome show. I'm glad she won, she deserved it.
I agree, although I'd want to clarify that her talent lies as an entertainer more than it does as a singer. IMO.
And I hope that Britney -hating is a phase that people grow out of, because if not jealous, the haters come off as being rather immature and spiteful. But whatever floats their boat. For the record, the same can be said for any rabid haters...I personally don't get it.
Bit-Bit
Feb 17th, 2005, 02:37 AM
Sorry, but how can you say she has an amazing voice when you can't tell because of all that computerized stuff that is put onto it. She certainly didn't sound amazing when she sung Everytime live.Blah haters i know who are my friends said she sounded fine and great on showtime. Before that they were impressed by her performances on snl. So I guess that comment went down the drain. Why are you trying to justify everything? Can't you just let others have their opinions on what they like? Do you really want everyone to agree with you? If they think/know Britney has a great voice then let them. Jeeze I hate it when people try to change others opinions.
Bit-Bit
Feb 17th, 2005, 02:39 AM
Blah Blah people said she would NEVER win a Grammy in any catergory. Nothing is stopping her from winning another one. Didn't Madonna win one for dance and then for vocals or something like that yet she doesn't have that great of a voice. She still won a couple though.
christina's-girl
Feb 17th, 2005, 08:51 AM
I feel sorry for you because 1) You have come and posted on a artists forum you don't like 2) you're acting all jealous and 3) you're trying to say that Britney doesn't get her award? It was on her album they are her vocals. So if you really have a problem with her what are you doing here? and lastly I've said this time and time again is Christina not keeping you interested? Because you seem to love coming back here. Anyway it doesn't change the fact that after Britney was declared a Grammy winner, some of you Christina fans got your panties in all tied up. It's funny now because you know why? Britney's got the awards, the sales, 4 #1 albums, the movies coming up, a happy marriage, the music, the fans, the sold out tours, endorsements (perfume) which will be making her probably over a cool $50-70 million once all said and done. It's on track to have sales of over $1 billion. Who wouldn't wanna celebrate that? :scratch: :laugh: :cool: :blueeek:
I am going to pick you out of the crowd because I don't think that anyone here has made a bigger hypocrite out of themselves besides you.
1. You feel sorry for me? How is that so? I remember having arguements with you on the CHRISTINA board and asking you the same thing, so don't go there. I suppose BS (which is exactly what her music is) wasn't keeping you busy while you were on the Christina board, huh?
I have been here only once before, and I remember you coming to the X-tina board more times than I can count. I like how you say "awards", like awards (Teen Choice, Nickelodeon, American Music) and popularity equals talent. I suppose that's how most of you BS fans think, though, cause most of you seem to be teenyboppers, in the land where whatever is popular is good. Nikka Costa doesn't make as much money as even Mandy Moore, but she is much more talented than Britney, not to mention Alicia Keys, Renee Oldsen, and... hell, there are so many that it would take me till tomorrow to list all of the talent that goes unpaid and unnoticed in the music industry. Britney was at the right place at the right time. Have you noticed how she never sings accapella when she is asked to sing one of her songs? Have you ever noticed how BAD she sounds when she does sing live? Have you ever noticed how many people it takes to help her make even the simplest of songs? Of course you wouldn't, because you are just looking at all the fluff that people want you to see: the empty hype, and all the glitz and glamor. Put any other talent in a room with Britney and just a chair and a microphone, and they would outshine her. Give any singer/songwriter (yep, even Christina) in a room alone with her and see what each of them come up with. People like you are the reason why they keep making crappy clones of the same crappy artists just to make money, all the while taking up valuable resources and time that could otherwise be filled with talent.
For the record, I cannot hate people I do not know.
Bit-Bit
Feb 17th, 2005, 10:07 AM
I am going to pick you out of the crowd because I don't think that anyone here has made a bigger hypocrite out of themselves besides you.
1. You feel sorry for me? How is that so? I remember having arguements with you on the CHRISTINA board and asking you the same thing, so don't go there. I suppose BS (which is exactly what her music is) wasn't keeping you busy while you were on the Christina board, huh?
I have been here only once before, and I remember you coming to the X-tina board more times than I can count. I like how you say "awards", like awards (Teen Choice, Nickelodeon, American Music) and popularity equals talent. I suppose that's how most of you BS fans think, though, cause most of you seem to be teenyboppers, in the land where whatever is popular is good. Nikka Costa doesn't make as much money as even Mandy Moore, but she is much more talented than Britney, not to mention Alicia Keys, Renee Oldsen, and... hell, there are so many that it would take me till tomorrow to list all of the talent that goes unpaid and unnoticed in the music industry. Britney was at the right place at the right time. Have you noticed how she never sings accapella when she is asked to sing one of her songs? Have you ever noticed how BAD she sounds when she does sing live? Have you ever noticed how many people it takes to help her make even the simplest of songs? Of course you wouldn't, because you are just looking at all the fluff that people want you to see: the empty hype, and all the glitz and glamor. Put any other talent in a room with Britney and just a chair and a microphone, and they would outshine her. Give any singer/songwriter (yep, even Christina) in a room alone with her and see what each of them come up with. People like you are the reason why they keep making crappy clones of the same crappy artists just to make money, all the while taking up valuable resources and time that could otherwise be filled with talent.
For the record, I cannot hate people I do not know.I admit I go there but I'm somewhat a fan of Christina. But whenever I'd go there I wanted to see why people would still make threads about Britney even though there's a rule about it. Ahh to answer the awards question an American Music Award isn't about popularity. It's based on material and sales if I can remember correctly. That is the biggest award before the grammy. But you hate that now because britney has both awards. Oh this is my lucky day people have asked her many times to sing acappella. Have you heard Stand by me? She sang this song with some guy who was interviweing her. She has sung Overprotected acappella while she travelled to Japan to be interviewed and perform her small set there. She's sang lonely acappella, You've got it all (jet's classic), she's sung sometimes acappella. This is just another thing that some of you are naive and ignorant about. You just called Christina a clone did you know that? She was modelled after Britney. Britney's gotta be doing something right to have stayed in the music biz for almost 8 years since she first started. I think what bugs all of you is that Britney was the first to come out, and when others started coming up after Britney, they were labeled as posers and copy cats. While Britney is the Original Doll. :cool:
lol I didn't say I hated anyone I said I hate when people try to change others opinion's. K? Maybe you should learn how to read.
jade.
Feb 17th, 2005, 10:36 AM
I admit I go there but I'm somewhat a fan of Christina. But whenever I'd go there I wanted to see why people would still make threads about Britney even though there's a rule about it. Ahh to answer the awards question an American Music Award isn't about popularity. It's based on material and sales if I can remember correctly. That is the biggest award before the grammy. But you hate that now because britney has both awards. Oh this is my lucky day people have asked her many times to sing acappella. Have you heard Stand by me? She sang this song with some guy who was interviweing her. She has sung Overprotected acappella while she travelled to Japan to be interviewed and perform her small set there. She's sang lonely acappella, You've got it all (jet's classic), she's sung sometimes acappella. This is just another thing that some of you are naive and ignorant about. You just called Christina a clone did you know that? She was modelled after Britney. Britney's gotta be doing something right to have stayed in the music biz for almost 8 years since she first started. I think what bugs all of you is that Britney was the first to come out, and when others started coming up after Britney, they were labeled as posers and copy cats. While Britney is the Original Doll. :cool:
lol I didn't say I hated anyone I said I hate when people try to change others opinion's. K? Maybe you should learn how to read.
Does it really matter who sings what, who came out first? Bla bla, it's people like you who keep the rival thing going which Britney AND Christina despise. You know yourself both of them are different artists but you just can't resist to compare them.
I'm not even going to bring up anything what you just have because it's pathetic. You go to the Christina board, hun - you would realize there hasn't been any Britney threads at all so stop using it as a excuse.
daddyslittlegirl
Feb 17th, 2005, 02:03 PM
I feel sorry for you because 1) You have come and posted on a artists forum you don't like 2) you're acting all jealous and 3) you're trying to say that Britney doesn't get her award? It was on her album they are her vocals. So if you really have a problem with her what are you doing here? and lastly I've said this time and time again is Christina not keeping you interested? Because you seem to love coming back here. Anyway it doesn't change the fact that after Britney was declared a Grammy winner, some of you Christina fans got your panties in all tied up. It's funny now because you know why? Britney's got the awards, the sales, 4 #1 albums, the movies coming up, a happy marriage, the music, the fans, the sold out tours, endorsements (perfume) which will be making her probably over a cool $50-70 million once all said and done. It's on track to have sales of over $1 billion. Who wouldn't wanna celebrate that? :scratch: :laugh: :cool: :blueeek:
Britney is going to be in a movie??? :scratch: :scratch: :scratch:
Bit-Bit
Feb 18th, 2005, 12:13 PM
Britney is going to be in a movie??? :scratch: :scratch: :scratch:Yes. There's a movie called In The Pink. With Tim Allen, Cher, Ciara (has a cameo supposedly) and Bette Midler.
go to www.imdb.com
search in the pink
daddyslittlegirl
Feb 18th, 2005, 02:11 PM
Yes. There's a movie called In The Pink. With Tim Allen, Cher, Ciara (has a cameo supposedly) and Bette Midler.
go to www.imdb.com
search in the pink
ok. :)
bsbfreakygirl
Feb 19th, 2005, 08:17 PM
are they just passing Grammys out in the streets nowdays......
hehe
SmartButPsycho
Feb 19th, 2005, 08:28 PM
are they just passing Grammys out in the streets nowdays......
hehe
yeah, but somehow they managed to miss the backstreet boys. :) sorry.
hazel1449
Feb 19th, 2005, 08:57 PM
yeah, but somehow they managed to miss the backstreet boys. :) sorry.
lol, i love the boys, but that comment about giving out grammys on the street was uncalled for, britney deserves that grammy, and more.
Bit-Bit
Feb 20th, 2005, 09:22 AM
yeah, but somehow they managed to miss the backstreet boys. :) sorry.Ouch! lol :laugh: :p
bsbfreakygirl
Feb 20th, 2005, 02:59 PM
yeah, but somehow they managed to miss the backstreet boys. :) sorry.
haha I wish I was still 14 to actually be hurt by that.
Mystic Man
Feb 21st, 2005, 02:44 AM
8 pages of bickering just because Britney won a Grammy? Sad.
hickens
Feb 23rd, 2005, 10:28 AM
Well, most people here are fine with that she won, there's just argument about why she won it. And the ones who think she won it because of vocals, believe anyone who thinks differently hates Britney's guts. Seriously, get over yourselves. We don't hate her, nor are we jealous, we simply think the win was because it is a good dance track. Chi^^ explained the award the best, IMO. Anyway - Just because we're not 110% obsessed with Britney and all up her ass, does not mean we hate her. Why is it that we can't dislike a single thing without automatically being "haters"? Hell, I'll be the first to admit that Britney is one of my guilty listening pleasures. It doesn't have to be one way or the other ya'll, some of us really are somewhere in the middle....so give us a break, and calm down.
SmartButPsycho
Feb 23rd, 2005, 02:04 PM
Well, most people here are fine with that she won, there's just argument about why she won it. And the ones who think she won it because of vocals, believe anyone who thinks differently hates Britney's guts. Seriously, get over yourselves. We don't hate her, nor are we jealous, we simply think the win was because it is a good dance track. Chi^^ explained the award the best, IMO. Anyway - Just because we're not 110% obsessed with Britney and all up her ass, does not mean we hate her. Why is it that we can't dislike a single thing without automatically being "haters"? Hell, I'll be the first to admit that Britney is one of my guilty listening pleasures. It doesn't have to be one way or the other ya'll, some of us really are somewhere in the middle....so give us a break, and calm down.
the fact of the matter is Britney won something no one ever expected her to win...and anyone who's ever said anything negative about Britney's career would use that as evidence, but now that Britney's won a Grammy, everyone's getting defensive because they can no longer say the things they used to say. why else would they CARE so highly to justify how Britney won her award.
jade.
Feb 23rd, 2005, 02:40 PM
Well, most people here are fine with that she won, there's just argument about why she won it. And the ones who think she won it because of vocals, believe anyone who thinks differently hates Britney's guts. Seriously, get over yourselves. We don't hate her, nor are we jealous, we simply think the win was because it is a good dance track. Chi^^ explained the award the best, IMO. Anyway - Just because we're not 110% obsessed with Britney and all up her ass, does not mean we hate her. Why is it that we can't dislike a single thing without automatically being "haters"? Hell, I'll be the first to admit that Britney is one of my guilty listening pleasures. It doesn't have to be one way or the other ya'll, some of us really are somewhere in the middle....so give us a break, and calm down.
Couldn't agree more. :kiss:
jade.
Feb 23rd, 2005, 02:44 PM
Why can't we let this drop already?! Yes, she won a Grammy. She deserves it, but some of you guys are getting a ego over it.. lol
Black Velvet
Feb 23rd, 2005, 02:52 PM
the fact of the matter is Britney won something no one ever expected her to win...and anyone who's ever said anything negative about Britney's career would use that as evidence, but now that Britney's won a Grammy, everyone's getting defensive because they can no longer say the things they used to say. why else would they CARE so highly to justify how Britney won her award.
WELL SAID!
:music:
Bit-Bit
Feb 23rd, 2005, 03:34 PM
the fact of the matter is Britney won something no one ever expected her to win...and anyone who's ever said anything negative about Britney's career would use that as evidence, but now that Britney's won a Grammy, everyone's getting defensive because they can no longer say the things they used to say. why else would they CARE so highly to justify how Britney won her award.Exactly. They have nothing now. They never did before anyway... lol :laugh: :p
Bit-Bit
Feb 23rd, 2005, 03:35 PM
Why can't we let this drop already?! Yes, she won a Grammy. She deserves it, but some of you guys are getting a ego over it.. lollol It happens with every artist's fans.
jade.
Feb 24th, 2005, 07:08 AM
Exactly. They have nothing now. They never did before anyway... lol :laugh: :p
Actually, there is always something to say. You can say something about Beyonce who won 5 Grammy's on her first time nominated, you can say anything. Not everyone thought Britney was talentless just cause she didn't win a Grammy - there are actually alot more reasons why she probably hasn't won in the past.
iloverock&roll
Mar 1st, 2005, 03:50 AM
Congratulations to our Grammy Girl Spears.
:love: :biggrin: :cool: :music: :sunny: :D
i_love_xtina
Mar 1st, 2005, 07:12 AM
Why did anyone bring up Christina anyway? pathetic.
Bit-Bit
Mar 1st, 2005, 07:20 AM
Yes it is pathetic that Christina was mentioned. But I surely didn't mention her first.
Black Velvet
Mar 2nd, 2005, 10:07 AM
Exactly. They have nothing now. They never did before anyway... lol :laugh: :p
so true. :laugh:
Taurus
Mar 2nd, 2005, 11:36 AM
Why is this till around? :eek:
jade.
Mar 2nd, 2005, 11:46 AM
..cause people like bragging.
Bit-Bit
Mar 2nd, 2005, 10:24 PM
..cause people like bragging.Oh give it a break. You would be all up in everyone's face if Christina won another one, and you were probably in everyone's face when she won in the past. You act as if we are the only ones who brag. If you call this bragging then you surely haven't seen bragging from me. The only thing I said was wow and congrats and that she deserves this and it was long overdue. Where as Christina fans shove it in our faces that she's won more than Britney. Just because you win more doesn't make you any better. Is Britney better than Christina because she has an AMA and Christina doesn't? How would you feel if I kept saying that over and over? I know some Christina fans wouldn't like that.
daddyslittlegirl
Mar 3rd, 2005, 01:37 PM
Oh give it a break. You would be all up in everyone's face if Christina won another one, and you were probably in everyone's face when she won in the past. You act as if we are the only ones who brag. If you call this bragging then you surely haven't seen bragging from me. The only thing I said was wow and congrats and that she deserves this and it was long overdue. Where as Christina fans shove it in our faces that she's won more than Britney. Just because you win more doesn't make you any better. Is Britney better than Christina because she has an AMA and Christina doesn't? How would you feel if I kept saying that over and over? I know some Christina fans wouldn't like that.
And the fact that Britney has sold more doesn't make her better than Christina, right???
Seriously people, ENOUGH WITH THE CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i_love_xtina
Mar 3rd, 2005, 09:57 PM
The whole Christina/Britney thing is just sooo 5/6 years ago..I wish people would just move on. :noway: But Unfortunatly that will never happen.
iloverock&roll
Mar 12th, 2005, 11:01 AM
The whole Christina/Britney thing is just sooo 5/6 years ago...
true...
Quathur
Mar 12th, 2005, 03:50 PM
Its not like she was honored enough to accept the award on stage, just goes to show u how unimportant the award is! And so typical to win a dance category! Toxic and a wicked beat!
Can u picture Britney going up stage accepting a grammy?
:roll:
"I would like to thank God, my family - HI JAMIEE mom and dad and bro!, my fans and last but certainly not least, my production with all the computers to make my crappy untalented voice sound decent and to trick losers out there buying my cd - HA HA to them! thanks guys , Wohoo!"
:laugh:
iloverock&roll
Mar 12th, 2005, 04:28 PM
i'm sure it would be better than christina's acceptance speech:
"oh my goodness you guys um um um um, what city is the um um um cannes film festival being held in this year??? um um um like you can't hold us down i'm a real deep thunker!!!" :laugh:
daddyslittlegirl
Mar 12th, 2005, 10:29 PM
Its not like she was honored enough to accept the award on stage, just goes to show u how unimportant the award is! And so typical to win a dance category! Toxic and a wicked beat!
Can u picture Britney going up stage accepting a grammy?
:roll:
"I would like to thank God, my family - HI JAMIEE mom and dad and bro!, my fans and last but certainly not least, my production with all the computers to make my crappy untalented voice sound decent and to trick losers out there buying my cd - HA HA to them! thanks guys , Wohoo!"
:laugh:
STOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's over. Seriously, knock it off.
And Christina doesn't say um a lot.
XtinaBFan!
Mar 12th, 2005, 10:35 PM
i'm sure it would be better than christina's acceptance speech:
"oh my goodness you guys um um um um, what city is the um um um cannes film festival being held in this year??? um um um like you can't hold us down i'm a real deep thunker!!!" :laugh:
Actually Christina's given three Grammy acceptance speeches, and a Latin Grammy acceptance speech, and none of them are even close to that. Sorry.
Remember Christina has a well equipped vocabulary. Yeah she's smart. Sorry bud.
Sunfire
Mar 12th, 2005, 11:30 PM
How old are you people? You are all acting so immature.
Mystic Man
Mar 13th, 2005, 05:30 AM
How old are you people? You are all acting so immature.
My thoughts exactly.
iloverock&roll
Mar 18th, 2005, 12:50 PM
Actually Christina's given three Grammy acceptance speeches, and a Latin Grammy acceptance speech, and none of them are even close to that. Sorry.
Remember Christina has a well equipped vocabulary. Yeah she's smart. Sorry bud.
riiiight... so equipped that practically every sentence ends with "whatnot"... intelligence at it's finest. :funny:
daddyslittlegirl
Mar 18th, 2005, 02:01 PM
riiiight... so equipped that practically every sentence ends with "whatnot"... intelligence at it's finest. :funny:
If u really want to go there, B says um and other things like that more than X.
XtinaBFan!
Mar 19th, 2005, 12:43 AM
riiiight... so equipped that practically every sentence ends with "whatnot"... intelligence at it's finest. :funny:
Hmmm. I rather her say whatnot then not know what a simple thing like "condiment" was. Much less walk out of an entire interview because of it. Britney probably doesn't know what whatnot is.
iloverock&roll
Mar 19th, 2005, 01:08 AM
Hmmm. I rather her say whatnot then not know what a simple thing like "condiment" was. Much less walk out of an entire interview because of it. Britney probably doesn't know what whatnot is.
does "where's the cannes film festival being held this year?" (hello... cannes is the CITY it's held in EVERY year) ring a bell (famous aguilera quote)?
and who cares if britney knows what "whatnot" is? it's a word for people who can't think of anything to say.
Chi^_^
Mar 19th, 2005, 04:20 AM
does "where's the cannes film festival being held this year?" (hello... cannes is the CITY it's held in EVERY year) ring a bell (famous aguilera quote)?
and who cares if britney knows what "whatnot" is? it's a word for people who can't think of anything to say.
If you believe that quote, then certainly, you must believe these:
I always listen to 'NSYNC's Tearin' Up My Heart. It reminds me to wear a bra.
Britney Spears
I don't want to pierce anything. I think it's outdated. Belly rings and all are, like, old.
Britney Spears
Britney has the last word on what she's been asked about most ...
What's more painful: getting your belly button pierced or getting a tattoo?
Belly button, definitely.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v74/3pheMeraLmiX/bsbbp.jpg
I think I'm more grounded, you know, and I know what I want out of life and I'm, you know, my morals are really, you know, strong and I have major beliefs about certain things and I think that has helped me, you know, from being, you know, coming from a really small town.
Britney Spears
The cool thing about being famous is traveling. I have always wanted to travel across seas, like to Canada and stuff.
Britney Spears
XtinaBFan!
Mar 19th, 2005, 06:41 AM
does "where's the cannes film festival being held this year?" (hello... cannes is the CITY it's held in EVERY year) ring a bell (famous aguilera quote)?
That quote is fake as hell. :music: And no, it's not a famous quote because no one knows where it came from.
and who cares if britney knows what "whatnot" is? it's a word for people who can't think of anything to say.
:noway:
Whatnot is a pronoun used to describe any of various other things that might also be mentioned in a sentence. Just like the usage of the words et cetera.
A word for people who can't think of anything to say?!?! What are they teaching you children in school today. If that's the case then ALL of the greatest minds REALLY didn't know what to say. As does 95% of the world.
Quathur
Mar 19th, 2005, 06:54 AM
PEOPLE!
...u have to come to a conclusion already of iloverock&roll&talentlessfakewhores!
she obviously dont know what she is talking about,have of he time she makes comments that has noting get to do with the topic!
typical 12 years olds is what she sounds like most of the time!
as for u iloverock&roll: I dare you to challange that fact that ur nothing nothing but a sad little girl in some trailer crying everytime about how you're such a loser and can't face the fact that ur idol is gone (and about time)!
u make me puke, *pat -thew* b!tch
Text in blue = not serious ;)
Bit-Bit
Mar 19th, 2005, 09:20 AM
Wow some people are just wow. (talking about some mindless Christina fans)
iloverock&roll
Mar 19th, 2005, 01:47 PM
That quote is fake as hell. :music: And no, it's not a famous quote because no one knows where it came from.
:noway:
Whatnot is a pronoun used to describe any of various other things that might also be mentioned in a sentence. Just like the usage of the words et cetera.
A word for people who can't think of anything to say?!?! What are they teaching you children in school today. If that's the case then ALL of the greatest minds REALLY didn't know what to say. As does 95% of the world.
greatest minds... riiiight.... the occasional use of what not or etc. is acceptable.... when one makes it a constant part of their vocabulary when trying to tell a story it shows lack of intelligence...
iloverock&roll
Mar 19th, 2005, 01:59 PM
If you believe that quote, then certainly, you must believe these:
does not matter... britney fans are aware she isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer and accept it (we find her adorable nonetheless)... most aguilera fans on the other hand like to portray her as some sort of brilliant, super intelligent genius when she is FAR from it.
Chi^_^
Mar 19th, 2005, 03:30 PM
does not matter... britney fans are aware she isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer and accept it (we find her adorable nonetheless)... most aguilera fans on the other hand like to portray her as some sort of brilliant, super intelligent genius when she is FAR from it.
Well, certainly that's quite honest of you to admit -- however, while some Christina fans do claim she's brilliant, I'd have to say that there are a lot fans who tend to be fairly objective about their opinions on her music writing or media composure.
Maybe it's due to the fact that I mainly read the posts that typically make sense? :) Then again, that might be because the fan-base on this particular board is much larger than with Britney's -- I'd assume the same would be reversed on a bigger Britney board.
XtinaBFan!
Mar 20th, 2005, 06:59 AM
greatest minds... riiiight.... the occasional use of what not or etc. is acceptable.... when one makes it a constant part of their vocabulary when trying to tell a story it shows lack of intelligence...
Yeeeesssss greeeeaatesst miiindsss. Do you need me to space that out for you to understand? And according to you Christina vocabulary is acceptable because "whatnot" is NOT a constant part of her vocabulary.
Using a simple everyday word shows lack of intellegence? You just proved how much of a half-wit you truely are.
And please to try to critique Christina's vocabulary when it is far more developed then Britney's. Christina actually answers a question rather than chewing up a couple of words and spitting it out like Britney.
XtinaBFan!
Mar 20th, 2005, 07:06 AM
does not matter... britney fans are aware she isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer and accept it (we find her adorable nonetheless)... most aguilera fans on the other hand like to portray her as some sort of brilliant, super intelligent genius when she is FAR from it.
No one trys to portray her as a genius. You just attacked her for using "um" too much, Whatnot, and this unknown quote...when all that was was utter a$$talk. We are just questioning your ignorance. Because quite frankly, Christina is far more quick-witted than Britney both Vocally and intellectually.
Quathur
Mar 20th, 2005, 07:59 AM
PEOPLE!
...u have to come to a conclusion already of iloverock&roll&talentlessfakewhores!
she obviously dont know what she is talking about,have of he time she makes comments that has noting get to do with the topic!
typical 12 years olds is what she sounds like most of the time!
as for u iloverock&roll: I dare you to challange that fact that ur nothing nothing but a sad little girl in some trailer crying everytime about how you're such a loser and can't face the fact that ur idol is gone (and about time)!
u make me puke, *pat -thew* b!tch
Text in blue = not serious ;)
allow me to correct myself
iloverock&roll, u make me puke!
*pat -thew (spits) * b!tch
text in red = i actually do mean! ;)
Bit-Bit
Mar 20th, 2005, 10:59 AM
greatest minds... riiiight.... the occasional use of what not or etc. is acceptable.... when one makes it a constant part of their vocabulary when trying to tell a story it shows lack of intelligence...Exactly. :music:
XtinaBFan!
Mar 20th, 2005, 01:44 PM
Exactly. :music:
Why the hell are you agreeing? You've showed us your a fry short of a happy meal. :roll:
Bit-Bit
Mar 20th, 2005, 06:48 PM
Why the hell are you agreeing? You've showed us your a fry short of a happy meal. :roll:Are you even a fan of Britney? Seriously is that what the B stands for or is that for Beyonce? All you do is bash on Britney because someone doesn't agree with you that Christina is some high and mighty intellectual. Well she's not and either is Britney. But I can say this for both of them they are smart at their jobs. When it comes to talking all I hear Christina say is ummm, and you know what I mean, and whatnot. The only thing Britney says a lot is "you know." But that's what everyone says. Everyone says like whether they admit it or not.
jade.
Mar 21st, 2005, 12:36 AM
Oh lord, drop this already - how old is it now?
XtinaBFan!
Mar 21st, 2005, 02:14 AM
Are you even a fan of Britney? Seriously is that what the B stands for or is that for Beyonce? All you do is bash on Britney because someone doesn't agree with you that Christina is some high and mighty intellectual. Well she's not and either is Britney. But I can say this for both of them they are smart at their jobs. When it comes to talking all I hear Christina say is ummm, and you know what I mean, and whatnot. The only thing Britney says a lot is "you know." But that's what everyone says. Everyone says like whether they admit it or not.
I like Britney. But it's her fans who constantly put up this wall against Christina fans. I know Christina uses words here and there a couple of times. But I came to defense because a "Britney" fan was critiquing her vocabulary when it's pretty obvious that Christina's vocab is more developed and just all around more full-fledged than Britney's.
LoveXtina
Mar 21st, 2005, 08:59 AM
yea, congrats.
too bad that you couldnt actually hear her voice over the studio enhancment.
Bit-Bit
Mar 21st, 2005, 03:26 PM
yea, congrats.
too bad that you couldnt actually hear her voice over the studio enhancment.Yeah she's got a grammy and you don't. Don't give that lame excuse for studio enhancment. Everyone uses that from Mariah and yes even Christina. Your lying to yourself if you think just one artists uses it just for the sake of bashing them because you don't like that particular artist.
Taurus
Mar 21st, 2005, 04:22 PM
LOL @ The argueing still going on!
daddyslittlegirl
Mar 21st, 2005, 04:37 PM
^^ I know. LOL!!!! It's over. LET IT GO PEOPLE LET IT GO!!!!!!!!
jimmyboy
Mar 21st, 2005, 09:52 PM
Yeah she's got a grammy and you don't. Don't give that lame excuse for studio enhancment. Everyone uses that from Mariah and yes even Christina. Your lying to yourself if you think just one artists uses it just for the sake of bashing them because you don't like that particular artist.
Mariah doesn't use it lol, I dunno about the rest
XtinaBFan!
Mar 22nd, 2005, 07:03 AM
Yeah she's got a grammy and you don't. Don't give that lame excuse for studio enhancment. Everyone uses that from Mariah and yes even Christina. Your lying to yourself if you think just one artists uses it just for the sake of bashing them because you don't like that particular artist.
:noway:
Mariah doesn't use it lol, I dunno about the rest
^Yes Mariah doesn't use it and neither does Christina and almost every other great vocalist.
Besides we know how they sound live. Which, most of the time, sounds better than the studio recording.
So you really can't support that asinine argument.
Chi^_^
Mar 22nd, 2005, 12:45 PM
Wow, still trying to prove Britney's Vocals by trying to invalidate Mariah's and Christina's. Bit-bit is on a roll.
hazel1449
Mar 22nd, 2005, 02:52 PM
who cares? i'm just glad britney won one, she deserved it :)
XtinaBFan!
Mar 22nd, 2005, 04:02 PM
who cares? i'm just glad britney won one, she deserved it :)
Me too. But your buddies start it back up.
She did deserve it. Especially since she was up against sorry competition. I think Toxic is her best song.
XtinaBFan!
Mar 22nd, 2005, 04:02 PM
Wow, still trying to prove Britney's Vocals by trying to invalidate Mariah's and Christina's. Bit-bit is on a roll.
:roll:
Silly isn't it.
jimmyboy
Mar 22nd, 2005, 07:29 PM
Wow, still trying to prove Britney's Vocals by trying to invalidate Mariah's and Christina's. Bit-bit is on a roll.
Yeah, he is now talking about Mariah, C'mon, she is way out of BS league, and way out of his too.
therealdeal
Mar 23rd, 2005, 09:28 AM
Wait wait wait..... someone like britney speares has catchy songs and a limited vocal ability...if you look at all of her songs in the production notes you'll realize that she doesn't make any of the songs herself. So basically anyone could be britney speares..... you just put a pretty face, a nice girl image (at first), a moderate singing voice(that's being generous) and give her some dance lessons and there's your pop star. I mean if you watch the Onyx hotel tour you realize she's barely singing through any of it at all. Other artists might not have sold as many records but they're writing their stuff on their own...maybe with a little help from producers but their name is part of the production of the song.....album sales would be easy for anyone who has a team of people creating hits for them. Another example is someone like Mariah Carey...she sure as hell doesn't write all of her material but the fact that she has an absolutely amazing voice shadows it. I like some of britney speares songs but it's not her that makes them.........whatever happened to artistic integrity? I mean Justin Timberlake was part of that lame packaged pop wave but he at least rose above it and actually put together his own stuff and was rather successful because of it. You're comparing britney who didn't even put together the song she won the grammy for with people that actually sat down and worked extremely hard to produce a good dance song. You can still like britney songs or like her image that is portrayed to the media and her fans but don't try to make it seem like she's this important artist....anyone can get handed songs and choreography.
therealdeal
Mar 23rd, 2005, 09:33 AM
Also there's an interesting article in Entertainment Weekly from a few weeks back that shows how her album sale have decreased drastically between albums. Her first sold over 10 million the next sold 8 then the next sold about 4....her latest album In The Zone only sold about 2 million and her greatest hits hasn't hit the million mark yet....her song my perogative off the album didn't even chart in the top 50 of Billboards Hot 100.
SmartButPsycho
Mar 23rd, 2005, 09:35 AM
Wait wait wait..... someone like britney speares has catchy songs and a limited vocal ability...if you look at all of her songs in the production notes you'll realize that she doesn't make any of the songs herself. So basically anyone could be britney speares..... you just put a pretty face, a nice girl image (at first), a moderate singing voice(that's being generous) and give her some dance lessons and there's your pop star. I mean if you watch the Onyx hotel tour you realize she's barely singing through any of it at all. Other artists might not have sold as many records but they're writing their stuff on their own...maybe with a little help from producers but their name is part of the production of the song.....album sales would be easy for anyone who has a team of people creating hits for them. Another example is someone like Mariah Carey...she sure as hell doesn't write all of her material but the fact that she has an absolutely amazing voice shadows it. I like some of britney speares songs but it's not her that makes them.........whatever happened to artistic integrity? I mean Justin Timberlake was part of that lame packaged pop wave but he at least rose above it and actually put together his own stuff and was rather successful because of it. You're comparing britney who didn't even put together the song she won the grammy for with people that actually sat down and worked extremely hard to produce a good dance song. You can still like britney songs or like her image that is portrayed to the media and her fans but don't try to make it seem like she's this important artist....anyone can get handed songs and choreography.
first, i wanna apologize to you for wasting 15 minutes of your time writing this pathetic attempt at decreditizing Britney's artistry. i would've given you half credit if it were based on FACTS. SORRY i had to give you a shut down :)
daddyslittlegirl
Mar 23rd, 2005, 10:52 AM
^^ :roll: :roll: :roll:
I know. I hate to break it to you but Mariah Carey writes ALL OF HER SONGS. Every song that she has sung (except 4 covers), she wrote. I don't know where the hell u got that from.
Black Velvet
Mar 23rd, 2005, 09:24 PM
who cares? i'm just glad britney won one, she deserved it :)
:music: :music: :music:
LoveXtina
Mar 24th, 2005, 08:09 AM
Yeah she's got a grammy and you don't. Don't give that lame excuse for studio enhancment. Everyone uses that from Mariah and yes even Christina. Your lying to yourself if you think just one artists uses it just for the sake of bashing them because you don't like that particular artist.
And you have a grammy? The studio enhancement might not be so bad if she could actually sing, but she just cant. She can dance and sell records based on the hype, but I can tell you its not because of talent. I dont think one artist uses it, but its sure more noticable with Britney. Just face it, she has a weak voice and needs EXTRA help from the studio.
ZiZo
Mar 25th, 2005, 10:57 PM
LOL This news is so OLD!! and people haters should get over it already. Your most hated celebrity won a grammy, why are you guys so angry about that?
And about the studio enchacement thingy, BIG ing Deal! Britney's voice played a big role in that song, and IMO the song wouldn't have been grammy worthy if it wasn't for her voice! :)
DiRrTy_sLaVe_4U
Mar 25th, 2005, 11:01 PM
What's the point of arguing whether or not she deserves it? No matter what you think you're not taking it away from her. You're just wasting your breath because you somebody you don't even know...stop being so pathetic and grow up.
Dr.K149
Mar 26th, 2005, 11:51 AM
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! too all the losers who ever doubted her, SUCK ON THAT!!!!!
Well good 4 her her worthless music finally won a gramy to xtina 4
Dr.K149
Mar 26th, 2005, 11:53 AM
:music: :music: :music:
LOL NO she don't! HAHAHaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Dr.K149
Mar 26th, 2005, 11:55 AM
Wooooooowa! Who cares LOL
Dr.K149
Mar 26th, 2005, 12:06 PM
omg omg omg omg britney won a grammy i am so happy!
OMG really me too AH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sight LOL
Dr.K149
Mar 26th, 2005, 12:08 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! too all the losers who ever doubted her, SUCK ON THAT!!!!!
Kiss my black ass
daddyslittlegirl
Mar 26th, 2005, 03:19 PM
What's the point of arguing whether or not she deserves it? No matter what you think you're not taking it away from her. You're just wasting your breath because you somebody you don't even know...stop being so pathetic and grow up.
So true. I don't know why people are bumping this thread. Let it go people. It's not like u can help it.....
ZiZo
Mar 26th, 2005, 10:52 PM
Wooooooowa! Who cares LOL
Obviously, you do :laugh:
daddyslittlegirl
Mar 26th, 2005, 10:58 PM
Obviously, you do :laugh:
Yeah, I know. :laugh: He says that he doesn't care but he replies 4 times. :laugh:
RingTheAlarm
Mar 26th, 2005, 11:11 PM
OMG :roll:
some of y'all are so dillusional.
Dr.K149
Mar 27th, 2005, 12:55 PM
Obviously, you do :laugh:
You know what why don't you Shut the f**k up. As matter of fact That was my first day So shus up :crazy:
Dr.K149
Mar 27th, 2005, 12:56 PM
[QUOTE=ZiZo]Obviously, you do :laugh:[/QUOTE All ya stupid Britney Spears fans could STFUp :angel: I dont care like i said that was my first day :devil: :kiss:
Dr.K149
Mar 27th, 2005, 12:58 PM
Yeah, I know. :laugh: He says that he doesn't care but he replies 4 times. :laugh:
So! :eek:
daddyslittlegirl
Mar 27th, 2005, 05:13 PM
So! :eek:
The point was that u saying that u didn't care, right? Then why do u keep arguing with them???
jade.
Mar 27th, 2005, 05:28 PM
The point was that u saying that u didn't care, right? Then why do u keep arguing with them???
Just ignore Dr. K - he's one of those people who just come into forums for the sake of a arguement.
daddyslittlegirl
Mar 27th, 2005, 05:50 PM
Just ignore Dr. K - he's one of those people who just come into forums for the sake of a arguement.
Yeah, he kinda reminds me of Oxymoron.
jade.
Mar 27th, 2005, 06:28 PM
Yeah, he kinda reminds me of Oxymoron.
Wouldn't surprise me if it is him. :greyno:
Dr.K149
Mar 28th, 2005, 07:54 PM
Wouldn't surprise me if it is him. :greyno:
Who the hell is oxym... those were my 1st two days. this is my third. i just putting my self in conversatoin. and so i like to argue but i could make ky case and my friends call me the lawyer
Dr.K149
Mar 28th, 2005, 07:54 PM
Obviously, you do :laugh:
You remind me of a bitch Kyla
Dr.K149
Mar 28th, 2005, 07:56 PM
Wouldn't surprise me if it is him. :greyno:
Why are you here you xtina hater/britney lover:crazy:
daddyslittlegirl
Mar 28th, 2005, 09:13 PM
Why are you here you xtina hater/britney lover:crazy:
Actually, xtina_beautiful isn't a X hater. She probably just happens to like B (as do I). Also, we both think that it's ridicolous to keep going on with this crap considering it's over and done with.
jade.
Mar 29th, 2005, 03:55 AM
Actually, xtina_beautiful isn't a X hater. She probably just happens to like B (as do I). Also, we both think that it's ridicolous to keep going on with this crap considering it's over and done with.
:kiss: ..hehe
Dr.K149
Mar 29th, 2005, 04:16 PM
Actually, xtina_beautiful isn't a X hater. She probably just happens to like B (as do I). Also, we both think that it's ridicolous to keep going on with this crap considering it's over and done with.
i have a smart questions :laugh: why are you dissing xtina
Dr.K149
Mar 29th, 2005, 04:17 PM
:kiss: ..hehe
What's so funny balls mouth:laugh:
daddyslittlegirl
Mar 29th, 2005, 06:28 PM
i have a smart questions :laugh: why are you dissing her xtina
I think that u mean question. What the hell does this mean??? It makes no sense at all.
daddyslittlegirl
Mar 29th, 2005, 06:30 PM
What's so funny balls mouth:laugh:
Nothing else to say so u call that person a name. How typical. :rolleye2: :rolleye2:
jade.
Mar 30th, 2005, 09:13 AM
What's so funny balls mouth:laugh:
:kiss:
Dr.K149
Apr 9th, 2005, 09:44 AM
:kiss:
:kiss: back to ya
Dr.K149
Apr 9th, 2005, 09:45 AM
What do u mean xtina beautifal
Gregory Hawk
Apr 9th, 2005, 09:47 AM
We just had to bump back this topic, didn't we? Great job, Dr.K.
Dr.K149
Apr 9th, 2005, 09:48 AM
Actually, xtina_beautiful isn't a X hater. She probably just happens to like B (as do I). Also, we both think that it's ridicolous to keep going on with this crap considering it's over and done with.
Look, her ass is :laugh: laughing at your dumbass
daddyslittlegirl
Apr 9th, 2005, 09:38 PM
Look, her ass is :laugh: laughing at your dumbass
How? And LOL @ u. Why are u still bringing this up. LET IT GO MAN! :roll: :laugh:
Black Velvet
May 21st, 2005, 06:51 AM
does anyone have a pic of her with her award?
Dr.K149
May 21st, 2005, 07:02 AM
How? And LOL @ u. Why are u still bringing this up. LET IT GO MAN! :roll: :laugh:
Hi im bringin it up again i dont let stuff go
daddyslittlegirl
May 21st, 2005, 04:46 PM
Hi im bringin it up again i dont let stuff go
:funny: :funny: :funny: :roll: :roll: :roll: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Black Velvet
May 28th, 2005, 06:45 AM
^you guys crack me up lol
SmartButPsycho
May 28th, 2005, 08:29 PM
Hi im bringin it up again i dont let stuff go
wow. it amazes me how dumb you are.
daddyslittlegirl
May 28th, 2005, 09:40 PM
wow. it amazes me how dumb you are.
Me to.
daddyslittlegirl
May 28th, 2005, 09:40 PM
^you guys crack me up lol
Your welcome :wink: He's just crazy. :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.