PDA

View Full Version : Arctic meltdown may uncover vast new sources of oil


Regis Philbin
Apr 20th, 2006, 07:16 PM
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/spiegel/0,1518,409001,00.html

Climate Change Sparks Scrap for Arctic Resources

By Philip Bethge

While scientists and conservationists worry about the potentially dire consequences of global warming, politicians and businessmen are already battling over how to reap the economic benefits from the Arctic thaw.

Arctic ice is melting faster than ever before.

It's not always easy hoisting a flag on Hans Island. The Canadians even had to bring along their own rocks to weigh down the foot of the mast. But then nothing could stand in the way of the success of operation "Frozen Beaver" -- at least from a Canadian perspective.

It was last July when Canadian soldiers raised the maple leaf banner over the tiny isle between Canada's Ellesmere Island and Greenland. Not long after that, Canada's Defense Minister Bill Graham flew in by helicopter to proclaim that Hans Island will always remain Canadian. The provocation worked: Denmark promptly cabled a note of protest to Ottawa.

The diplomatic spat marked the current highpoint of a bizarre scuffle over who owns a 1.3 square kilometer bit of barren rock in the middle of the Arctic Nares Straits. Its biggest attraction is what is probably the northern-most outhouse in the world. Yet for Canada and Denmark -- a country which has also repeatedly planted its flag in the islet's stony ground -- the dispute means much more: Hans Island is a test case for the sort of territorial rows which could soon become a lot more common north of the Arctic Circle.

Carving up the frosty Arctic is a hot topic right now for many countries. At stake are the sovereign rights to enormous reserves of natural resources, as well the control of seafaring routes which have until now been blocked by ice. The reason for the newly awakened interest is that the Arctic is rapidly warming. Nowhere else on the planet have such far-reaching consequences of global warming been observed. While biologists and climate researchers fear melting icecaps, rising floodwaters and extinctions of several species, oil and gas companies are hoping the Artic thaw will enable them to access vast new energy sources.

"How our climate will look in the next few decades, is being decided in the Arctic," says Hans-Wolfgang Hubberten of the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Potsdam (AWI). This week Hubberten played host to Germany's first "Arctic Science Summit Week" in Potsdam near Berlin. Around 150 scientists from all over the world came to discuss the effects that Arctic warming would have on landmasses, people, animals, plants and the global climate.

"We are noticing a rapid decrease in sea ice in the Arctic Ocean and the permafrost on the ground is melting," says Volker Rachold of the International Arctic Science Committee, an organization that coordinates Arctic research worldwide. Scientists say that air temperatures are higher than they have been for centuries. And as a consequence, Greenland's ice is melting more quickly than ever and Alaska's glaciers continue to shrink rapidly.

db44
Apr 20th, 2006, 07:18 PM
We'll need it for all the motorboats we'll be trading our cars in for on the coast. :rolleyes:

tiger_rascal
Apr 20th, 2006, 07:23 PM
I always knew something good would come out of global warming. :rolleyes:

pinky
Apr 20th, 2006, 07:32 PM
How ironic......our use of fossil fuels has contributed to such high temperatures that the arctic is melting, and we'll be able to find even MORE fossil fuels to burn. :rolleyes:

tiger_rascal
Apr 20th, 2006, 07:33 PM
We obviously need to learn how to harness the water!!!

Regis Philbin
Apr 20th, 2006, 07:52 PM
Well, I guess the libs can't use the ol' "We're running out of oil" theory anymore...

tiger_rascal
Apr 20th, 2006, 07:57 PM
Even if we werent running out of oil, we should still find alternative solutions for energy for two reasons, 1: the environment and 2. oil is still a fossil fuel.

pinky
Apr 20th, 2006, 08:15 PM
Regis, try reading my earlier post.....

*Katy*
Apr 20th, 2006, 10:23 PM
I always knew something good would come out of global warming. :rolleyes:
Lol! My thoughts exactly, i love how he finds some "logical" way to justify everything!

Java
Apr 20th, 2006, 10:51 PM
Antartica is melting faster too, and between this and Greenland's ice melting and flowing into the oceans (plus isostatic rebound displacing even more water) all the world's port cities will need to be moved inland or allowed to sink beneath the rising seas. Can the world afford it at a time when many nations' breadbaskets will be either flooded over or drying up from the increased heat too?

Stopanimalabuse
Apr 21st, 2006, 05:25 AM
Why am I not surprised that oil and gas companies would be happy over something like this?

Stopanimalabuse
Apr 21st, 2006, 05:33 AM
Antartica is melting faster too, and between this and Greenland's ice melting and flowing into the oceans (plus isostatic rebound displacing even more water) all the world's port cities will need to be moved inland or allowed to sink beneath the rising seas. Can the world afford it at a time when many nations' breadbaskets will be either flooded over or drying up from the increased heat too?
I've heard that Greenland losing its ice would cause a rise in 20-30 feet, while Antarctica(a long time from now, but there is a good possibility it will happen) could cause a 200-feet rise in the sea level. I've heard many US(New York City being one of them) and many of the bigger cities worldwide will be under water. Potentially billions of people will be affected by this, while a huge number(particluarly in third world countries) will also be affected by the numerous droughts which are expected to occur by this time. Even just a rise in 3 F is expected to cause huge suffering.

pinky
Apr 21st, 2006, 11:03 AM
Who cares, as long as Exxon makes record profits? :rolleyes:

Java
Apr 21st, 2006, 07:18 PM
What people haven't realised about Antartica in relationship to Greenland's melting ice adding 20 to 30 feet to sea level is that ice floats, and when 20 to 30 feet of water surround large blocks of ice attached to the land they're going to break loose. This alone should give just a hint, but people still need to realise what the sudden removal of these large ice obstructions will do for the acceleration of glacial flows towards the sea and thus causing this process to become self-feeding. Just a note for those good with math, chemistry and physics -- Ever wonder how many BTU's it takes to melt enough ice to create a 20-30 foot increase in sea level and what happens when we still get these incoming BTU's after that ice is gone and there's less left to work upon? It doesn't take rocket science to see what coming.