PDA

View Full Version : At least he wasn't sentenced to death!


pinky
Jul 12th, 2006, 08:31 AM
http://www.comcast.net/news/national/index.jsp?cat=DOMESTIC&fn=/2006/07/11/431998.html&cvqh=crime_dna
DNA Evidence Clears Wrongly Convicted Man
By STEPHANIE REITZ, Associated Press Writer


HARTFORD, Conn. - A man who spent 18 years in prison on a rape charge walked out of court Tuesday a free man, exonerated by DNA evidence.

James Calvin Tillman, 44, had been imprisoned since his arrest in 1988. He was sentenced a year later to 45 years in prison.

Hartford Superior Court Judge Thomas Miano granted Tillman's request last month for a new trial and released him on his own recognizance. On Tuesday, Miano dropped all charges and wished him "health and happiness into the future."

With his mother and brother by his side, a smiling Tillman talked to reporters outside the courthouse. He said he is not angry or bitter.

Neither Tillman nor his attorneys would say whether he plans to sue the state or seek other compensation. Connecticut does not have a compensation policy for the wrongly convicted...

Recent DNA tests proved that evidence on the victim's clothing from the 1988 crime did not match Tillman's genetic profile, contradicting circumstantial evidence from his trial...

Venisenvy
Jul 12th, 2006, 10:06 AM
It amazes me that he is not angry nor bitter, if that had happened to me I dont think there would be an end to my rage.

pinky
Jul 12th, 2006, 10:16 AM
I agree. But that's what he's saying now, when he's mostly feeling elation about his release. Maybe when he can't get a decent job because he has no experience, and finds himself constantly trying to catch up to others in his age group, some bitterness might creep in.

I'm not sure how I feel about compensation for those who are wrongly convicted. On the one hand, it seems only fair that people be given something to help them get somewhere near where they would have otherwise been. On the other, if there was no misconduct on the part of a prosecutor or witness, can we legitimately say that our legal system failed? The reason he was convicted was that technology was not as advanced as it is now, and that the (severely traumatized) victim made a mistake. Should taxpayers years later be responsible for that?

It's certainly a dilemma.

Regis Philbin
Jul 13th, 2006, 12:29 AM
Why would he be sentenced to death??? :scratch:

From what I read there he didn't kill anyone so death would not be an option...

Annoyedlistner
Jul 13th, 2006, 06:21 AM
Why would he be sentenced to death??? :scratch:

From what I read there he didn't kill anyone so death would not be an option...

SC is considering killing child rapers..............

pinky
Jul 13th, 2006, 08:31 AM
Why would he be sentenced to death??? :scratch:

From what I read there he didn't kill anyone so death would not be an option...
Missed my point again, sweetie.

How many people HAVE been sentenced to death for crimes they didn't commit?

SparkleHugs
Jul 13th, 2006, 12:28 PM
SC is considering killing child rapers..............



i think thats a decent punishment for a child molester.

Annoyedlistner
Jul 13th, 2006, 01:19 PM
i think thats a decent punishment for a child molester.


So do i....but the govt shouldnt kill...thats a completely different debate.

pinky
Jul 13th, 2006, 07:45 PM
"Prison justice" is more appropriate for such offenders. Also more punishment than death, because they have to live with it and have no control over it. And control issues are what cause them to do what they do to the most helpless of all.