PDA

View Full Version : Dick Cheney on Joe Lieberman


Regis Philbin
Aug 9th, 2006, 08:10 PM
http://www.rnc.org/News/Read.aspx?ID=6481

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

Vice President Cheney On The Defeat Of Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT) In The Democrat Primary


From Telephonic Interview Of The Vice President
By Wire Service Reporters

August 9, 2006


THE VICE PRESIDENT: I know Joe Lieberman and have a good deal of respect for him given that we were opponents in the 2000 campaign; and of course, spent a fair amount of time watching the man and studying him over the years, especially in connection with our debate in 2000. And as I look at what happened yesterday, it strikes me that it's a perhaps unfortunate and significant development from the standpoint of the Democratic Party, that what it says about the direction the party appears to be heading in when they, in effect, purge a man like Joe Lieberman, who was just six years ago their nominee for Vice President, is of concern, especially over the issue of Joe's support with respect to national efforts in the global war on terror.

The thing that's partly disturbing about it is the fact that, the standpoint of our adversaries, if you will, in this conflict, and the al Qaeda types, they clearly are betting on the proposition that ultimately they can break the will of the American people in terms of our ability to stay in the fight and complete the task. And when we see the Democratic Party reject one of its own, a man they selected to be their vice presidential nominee just a few short years ago, it would seem to say a lot about the state the party is in today if that's becoming the dominant view of the Democratic Party, the basic, fundamental notion that somehow we can retreat behind our oceans and not be actively engaged in this conflict and be safe here at home, which clearly we know we won't -- we can't be. So we have to be actively engaged not only i n Afghanistan and Iraq, but on a global basis if we're going to succeed in prevailing in this long-term conflict.

So it's an unfortunate development, I think, from the standpoint of the Democratic Party to see a man like Lieberman pushed aside because of his willingness to support an aggressive posture in terms of our national security strategy.

Richard Tafoya
Aug 10th, 2006, 10:46 AM
Think Progress responds:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/08/10/cheney-ct/

As the Mideast sits on the brink of regional war, Vice President Dick Cheney spent his time yesterday holding a teleconference to discuss the outcome of the Democratic Senate primary in Connecticut. Cheney said that to “purge a man like Joe Lieberman” was “of concern, especially over the issue of Joe’s support with respect to national efforts in the global war on terror.” He explained:
The thing that’s partly disturbing about it is the fact that, the standpoint of our adversaries, if you will, in this conflict, and the al Qaeda types, they clearly are betting on the proposition that ultimately they can break the will of the American people in terms of our ability to stay in the fight and complete the task.
Cheney’s argument assumes that the war in Iraq is helping the United States defeat terrorists. He’s wrong. His own State Department found last April that Iraq had become a safe haven for terrorists and attracted a “foreign fighter pipeline (http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/04/28/terror.report/index.html?section=cnn_topstories)” linked to terrorist plots, cells and attacks throughout the world. An overwhelming bipartisan majority (84% (http://web0.foreignpolicy.com/issue_julyaug_2006/TI-index/index.html)) of national security experts believe we are losing the war on terror, and 87 percent (http://web1.foreignpolicy.com/issue_julyaug_2006/TI-index/thepopularfront.htmlhttp://web1.foreignpolicy.com/issue_julyaug_2006/TI-index/thepopularfront.html) think Iraq has had a negative impact.

Cheney should spend less time analyzing the Democratic primary in Connecticut and more time acknowledging the administration’s critical policy failures and trying to fix them. (A good place to start is the American Progress plan, Strategic Redeployment 2.0 (http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=1613929).)

db44
Aug 10th, 2006, 12:03 PM
Hmm. You don't think Cheney would try and drive a wedge into the Democratic party, do you?

If he's concerned its 'cause he knows the other side has done something to better itself.

pinky
Aug 10th, 2006, 12:18 PM
Actually, I don't think Cheney would do that. That's Rove's job.

I would think Cheney would be more interested in shutting down the Democratic Party completely. Maybe take them all hunting, or something. :p

db44
Aug 10th, 2006, 02:20 PM
You remind me of something I wanted to say... Now that I live out here in the Southwest, I see wild quail all the time. They are small, (cute... I'm comfortable in my masculinity to say that. :p), slow and communal. They don't fly often or well. This is just all from many observations. The idea that they are worthy of hunting is beyond me.

pinky
Aug 10th, 2006, 04:22 PM
Are you suggesting that Richard Bruce Cheney is an insecure bully?

db44
Aug 10th, 2006, 06:51 PM
Not in such words, but I guess it fits.