PDA

View Full Version : New coal plants bury 'Kyoto' China, India, U.S. building power plants at record pace


Regis Philbin
Oct 29th, 2006, 08:36 PM
Paging Al Gore...Al Gore?...Al? Maybe Al should go to China and India where the real impact on 'global warming' is taking place. Al Gore???...


http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1223/p01s04-sten.html


New coal plants bury 'Kyoto'

New greenhouse-gas emissions from China, India, and the US will swamp cuts from the Kyoto treaty.


By Mark Clayton | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

So much for Kyoto.

The official treaty to curb greenhouse-gas emissions hasn't gone into effect yet and already three countries are planning to build nearly 850 new coal-fired plants, which would pump up to five times as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as the Kyoto Protocol aims to reduce.

The magnitude of that imbalance is staggering.

Environmentalists have long called the treaty a symbolic rather than practical victory in the fight against global warming. But even many of them do not appear aware of the coming tidal wave of greenhouse-gas emissions by nations not under Kyoto restrictions.

By 2012, the plants in three key countries - China, India, and the United States - are expected to emit as much as an extra 2.7 billion tons of carbon dioxide, according to a Monitor analysis of power-plant construction data. In contrast, Kyoto countries by that year are supposed to have cut their CO2 emissions by some 483 million tons.

The findings suggest that critics of the treaty, including the Bush administration, may be correct when they claim the treaty is hopelessly flawed because it doesn't limit emissions from the developing world. But they also suggest that the world is on the cusp of creating a huge new infrastructure that will pump out enormous amounts of CO2 for the next six decades.

----------

"If all those power plants are online by 2012, then obviously it completely cancels out any gains from Kyoto," says Gavin Schmidt, a climate modeler with the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, part of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

The reason for the dramatic imbalance is coal. Just a few years ago, economists and environmentalists still pictured a world shifting steadily from "dirty" coal-fired power plants to "cleaner" natural-gas turbines. But the fast-rising price of natural gas and other factors abruptly changed that picture. Now the world is facing a tidal wave of new power plants fired by coal, experts say. "China and India are building coal-fired capacity as fast as they can," says Christopher Bergesen, who tracks power plant construction for Platts, the energy publishing division of McGraw- Hill.

China is the dominant player. The country is on track to add 562 coal-fired plants - nearly half the world total of plants expected to come online in the next eight years. India could add 213 such plants; the US, 72.

Altogether, those three nations are set to add up to 327,000 megawatts by 2012 - three quarters of the new capacity in the global pipeline and roughly equal to the output of today's US coal-fired generating fleet.

DoubleEdgeSword
Oct 30th, 2006, 02:50 AM
We are at a crisis point to develop new energy resources. China's needs for energy is growing exponentially. As the article states, India and the US are also needing more energy. Conservation is fine but it must go hand in hand with development of new energy sources.

But, I do have faith in science. As humans, we have accomplished great things. We've put people into space, invented the computer, the automobile, the jet, the cell phone, atomic reactors... and many more amazing discoveries and inventions in a relatively short space of time. It will take money and it will take competition. Yes, competition. I've always believed that it is competition that drives discovery, not cooperation. Some group needs to get that we-can-do-it-better-and-fast-than-you mindset and challenge the rest of the world. And private enterprise and the government need to cough up the money to do so.

So, Richie, as to your snarky Al Gore remarks, does this mean you do believe that coal-fired energy plants do add to polution and global warming, or do you still think Gore is full of crap and this increase in coal plants is just dandy?