PDA

View Full Version : Don't blame Rumsfeld, the generals are in charge..


Sinister
Nov 2nd, 2006, 12:39 PM
Reid: Boehner Blames the Military

11/1/2006 6:04:00 PM

To: National Desk

Contact: Jim Manley or Rebecca Kirszner, 202-224-2939, both of the Office of Harry Reid

WASHINGTON, Nov. 1 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid released the following statement on House Majority Leader John Boehner's decision to blame the troops for Republican failures in Iraq.

"John Boehner ought to be ashamed. He's blaming our troops for failures in Iraq. If he wants to cast blame, he can start by looking in the mirror because he and his Congressional Republican colleagues have rubberstamped the Bush Administration's failed policy for nearly four years. Our troops in Iraq have performed bravely. It's political leaders like Congressman Boehner and Donald Rumsfeld, who have failed. I expect President Bush and Congressional Republicans, who demanded John Kerry apologize, hold their own party's majority leader to a much higher standard. There's no spinning his disparaging comments. He made them. He needs to apologize."

---

House Majority Leader John Boehner: Wolf, I understand that, but let's not blame what's happening in Iraq on Rumsfeld.

Wolf Blitzer: But he's in charge of the military.

House Majority Leader John Boehner: But the fact is the generals on the ground are in charge and he works closely with them and the president.

CNN, 11/1/06

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=75542

pinky
Nov 2nd, 2006, 01:13 PM
I guess even the generals got stuck in Iraq. :rolleyes:

DoubleEdgeSword
Nov 2nd, 2006, 01:22 PM
And the president is Commander in Chief, but I suppose we shouldn't blame him either.

The buck doesn't stop with anyone in this administration, does it? They're just busy passing it around and hoping nothing gets on thier hands in the process.

db44
Nov 2nd, 2006, 01:43 PM
Let's put it this way: How many times did Rumsfeld et. al. ignore the gererals, to the point even of starting this campaign in the first place?

Or when the generals say we're heading for civil war in Iraq, why are we to take Rummy's words we aren't then not blame Rumsfeld when he's the supposed voice we're to listen to?