Regis Philbin
Dec 9th, 2006, 03:21 PM
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061208/D8LST9K00.html
Foley Panel: GOP Left Pages Vulnerable
Dec 8, 4:10 PM (ET)
By LARRY MARGASAK
WASHINGTON (AP) - Republican lawmakers and aides left male pages vulnerable to Rep. Mark Foley's improper sexual advances even though the first concerns surfaced more than a decade ago, the ethics committee said Friday in a report into an election-year scandal that convulsed the House.
The committee said one witness testified that he warned one lawmaker, Illinois Rep. John Shimkus, a year ago that he viewed Foley as a "ticking time bomb" who had been confronted repeatedly.
The panel said it found no evidence that any current lawmakers or aides violated any rules, and recommended no sanctions.
But it said it discovered a pattern of conduct on the part of many individuals "to remain willfully ignorant of the potential consequences" of Foley's conduct.
Speculating on the reason for their reluctance to act, the committee said:
"Some may have been concerned that raising the issue too aggressively might have risked exposing Rep. Foley's homosexuality.... There is some evidence that political considerations played a role in decisions that were made by persons in both parties."
Foley Panel: GOP Left Pages Vulnerable
Dec 8, 4:10 PM (ET)
By LARRY MARGASAK
WASHINGTON (AP) - Republican lawmakers and aides left male pages vulnerable to Rep. Mark Foley's improper sexual advances even though the first concerns surfaced more than a decade ago, the ethics committee said Friday in a report into an election-year scandal that convulsed the House.
The committee said one witness testified that he warned one lawmaker, Illinois Rep. John Shimkus, a year ago that he viewed Foley as a "ticking time bomb" who had been confronted repeatedly.
The panel said it found no evidence that any current lawmakers or aides violated any rules, and recommended no sanctions.
But it said it discovered a pattern of conduct on the part of many individuals "to remain willfully ignorant of the potential consequences" of Foley's conduct.
Speculating on the reason for their reluctance to act, the committee said:
"Some may have been concerned that raising the issue too aggressively might have risked exposing Rep. Foley's homosexuality.... There is some evidence that political considerations played a role in decisions that were made by persons in both parties."