PDA

View Full Version : Jennifer Garner: 'Not A Good Way To Live Your Life'


Beutifulstranger
Jan 23rd, 2007, 09:13 AM
Jennifer Garner has slammed Britney Spears and Paris Hilton for flashing their private parts.

The actress � who is married to actor Ben Affleck � insists she was �appalled� by the two young stars antics.

She said: �I don�t think it is a good way to live your life.�

Source: eCanadaNow.com

Mod edit- Do not post full articles. That is against the LiveDaily TOS. Thanks

ThoughtIKnewYou
Jan 23rd, 2007, 09:32 AM
LOL @ Bette Midler's comments in that article

thisismyusername
Jan 23rd, 2007, 09:55 AM
I love me some Miss M

ThoughtIKnewYou
Jan 23rd, 2007, 09:58 AM
Which one? Midler or Madonna?

I like Jennifer Garner, she seems like a sweet and down-to-earth person

Janis
Jan 23rd, 2007, 11:56 AM
Well the ones saying that are respectable classy mature women. I agree with her.

Erizo
Jan 24th, 2007, 01:28 AM
She is right. And she has class. Britney has lost her grip; she will never be classified as classy lady, no matter what she does. That doesn't mean that she won't get attention from media. She most likely will. But attention never equals respect, class, and success.

jade.
Jan 24th, 2007, 04:40 AM
She is right. And she has class. Britney has lost her grip; she will never be classified as classy lady, no matter what she does. That doesn't mean that she won't get attention from media. She most likely will. But attention never equals respect, class, and success.
Exactly.. no one will ever see Britney as the sweet virginal role model. She has showed everyone that she has to do something pathetic to grab peoples attention before her album gets released. I thought it was abit odd how one month we never seen anything from her then the next month we see her out with Paris Hilton and flashing her vagina, it's disgusting and obviously done for publicity.

lonely3
Jan 24th, 2007, 08:16 AM
What's done is done. As long as she doesn't do it anymore, who cares?

heavenwaits_22
Jan 24th, 2007, 08:57 PM
Typical. ahem... (you like anyone who is against Britney.)

Why are they even asking Jennifer Garner this? It happened months ago. It just shows poor jounalism that she can't even get attention for her new movie.

No one would've cared if the name Britney wasn't attached to it.

ThoughtIKnewYou
Jan 25th, 2007, 09:17 AM
I'm sure Jennifer Garner was asked and simply repsonded....not harm in that. Its not like she condemned her to death. AS her fan you should understand that people are either worried about her or disgusted by her or both.

heavenwaits_22
Jan 25th, 2007, 11:11 AM
ROFL plz. There was an intention to ask that question, and that's the only question that was broadcasted. She wanted to be heard.

Anyone mentioning the name Britney = publicity.

heavenwaits_22
Jan 25th, 2007, 11:11 AM
d/p.

aleronihead
Jan 26th, 2007, 02:34 PM
ROFL plz. There was an intention to ask that question, and that's the only question that was broadcasted. She wanted to be heard.

Anyone mentioning the name Britney = publicity.

I personally don't think Jen Garner gives two ****s about getting publicity through using Britneys name. The magazine wants superfans and tabloid junkies to buy issues, so they put out a lame quote.

Personally, I think that quote is stupid and probably taken completely out of context. I'd like to read the article and see what the hell it might have meant.

ThoughtIKnewYou
Jan 29th, 2007, 01:57 PM
ROFL plz. There was an intention to ask that question, and that's the only question that was broadcasted. She wanted to be heard.

Anyone mentioning the name Britney = publicity.

LOL you think anyone who mentions Britney is desperate for publicity, but you won't admit thaqt britney herself is desperate for positive publicity and thats more than likely why she takes her son around with her 24/7 and endangers him....all so she can look like a "good parent"

jade.
Jan 29th, 2007, 04:00 PM
LOL you think anyone who mentions Britney is desperate for publicity, but you won't admit thaqt britney herself is desperate for positive publicity and thats more than likely why she takes her son around with her 24/7 and endangers him....all so she can look like a "good parent"
You are going too far now - she is taking her son around with her 24/7 because it's her son. The woman can't win, people would be complaining if she never took him out and started wondering allsorts of things. It really is pathetic.

heavenwaits_22
Jan 29th, 2007, 05:26 PM
rofl at Britney endagering Sean. Right. You should just not speak about Britney because the things you're saying are beyond stupid.

heavenwaits_22
Jan 29th, 2007, 05:26 PM
d/p.

Britina
Jan 30th, 2007, 05:44 AM
You are going too far now - she is taking her son around with her 24/7 because it's her son. The woman can't win, people would be complaining if she never took him out and started wondering allsorts of things. It really is pathetic.
Exactly.

People bitched that she was going out every night and not being home with her babies...now she's getting bitched at because she takes Sean with her everywhere.

She can never win.

ThoughtIKnewYou
Jan 30th, 2007, 10:00 AM
You are going too far now - she is taking her son around with her 24/7 because it's her son. The woman can't win, people would be complaining if she never took him out and started wondering allsorts of things. It really is pathetic.

I don't see anyone complaining about her not taking Jayden out....I think its smart of her not to....considering she's almost dropped Sean from being pursued by photogs a few times and then driven around with him on her lap. It's not safe for her to be carrying around infants in the streets, LOL.

I just think its funny that Heaven thinks that anyone who mentions Britneys name is desperate for publicity when Britney herself has exploited herself, her marriage, and her firstborn PLENTY of times for unnecessary publicty. Its like the pot calling the kettle black

thisismyusername
Jan 30th, 2007, 10:45 AM
She is right. And she has class. Britney has lost her grip; she will never be classified as classy lady, no matter what she does. That doesn't mean that she won't get attention from media. She most likely will. But attention never equals respect, class, and success.

I totally hate to bring up Christina in the Britney board, but Christina went through her Dirrty phase, as did several other stars that I can't think of. Madonna? But now people are seeing them as a classy lady. There are a multitude of things different between all of their 'wrong turns' but I think every star (and person, for that matter) does get a second chance, honestly.

speedyforme
Feb 2nd, 2007, 03:21 PM
I totally hate to bring up Christina in the Britney board, but Christina went through her Dirrty phase, as did several other stars that I can't think of. Madonna? But now people are seeing them as a classy lady. There are a multitude of things different between all of their 'wrong turns' but I think every star (and person, for that matter) does get a second chance, honestly.

Christina was dirty but never made a real excuse, she said she wanted to get it out of her system before she grew old and had a family.

Britney did this as a mother of 2 toddlers/babies and apparently flashes her poor lifestyle everywhere.

Not to mention Xtina never showed her cooch...just some breastesses

Gregory Hawk
Feb 2nd, 2007, 10:57 PM
Truer words were never spoken.

heavenwaits_22
Feb 3rd, 2007, 01:10 PM
Yeah because christina never thrusted her cooch. There are pics of Christina's cooch performing.

Erizo
Feb 3rd, 2007, 02:09 PM
Britney's tastelessness is in its own class. Christina can never top her in that, and that is nothing but a good thing.

jade.
Feb 3rd, 2007, 02:19 PM
Yeah because christina never thrusted her cooch. There are pics of Christina's cooch performing.
Please post the pix of her cooch. I have never ever seen her cooch even while she was performing, touching it is a completely different thing..