PDA

View Full Version : McCain attacks Rumsfeld: "One of the worst defense secretaries in history"


Richard Tafoya
Feb 19th, 2007, 04:31 PM
AP:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/19/mccain.ap/

Republican presidential candidate John McCain said Monday the war in Iraq has been mismanaged for years and former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld will be remembered as one of the worst in history.

"We are paying a very heavy price for the mismanagement -- that's the kindest word I can give you -- of Donald Rumsfeld, of this war," the Arizona senator said.

"The price is very, very heavy and I regret it enormously." McCain told an overflow crowd of more than 800 at a retirement community near Hilton Head Island, South Carolina.

McCain, the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, complained that Rumsfeld never put enough troops on the ground to succeed in Iraq.

"I think that Donald Rumsfeld will go down in history as one of the worst secretaries of defense in history," McCain said to applause.

The comments were in sharp contrast to McCain's statement when Rumsfeld resigned in November, and failed to address the reality that President Bush is the commander in chief.

"While Secretary Rumsfeld and I have had our differences, he deserves Americans' respect and gratitude for his many years of public service," McCain said last year when Rumsfeld stepped down.

pinky
Feb 19th, 2007, 09:47 PM
Funny, that's not quite what McCain said when Rumsfeld left office in November....

"While Secretary Rumsfeld and I have had our differences, he deserves Americans' respect and gratitude for his many years of public service," was what he had to say then.

Flip.


Flop.

DoubleEdgeSword
Feb 19th, 2007, 11:59 PM
That's the difference between John McCain, Senator and John McCain, presidential candidate. Whatever way the wind blows...

moocowsforever
Feb 23rd, 2007, 01:35 AM
It's sad. McCain was always seen as a man that stuck to his guns; he was true to his word.

Now he's courting the hideous Jerry Falwell (whom he had said was creating an environment of intolerance), wanting to overturn Roe V Wade, and is calling out Rumsfeld?

And liberal CNN is right: he fails to realize that Bush is commander in chief. So why is he supporting the one that is mismanaging?

Sunflowergirl
Feb 23rd, 2007, 04:14 PM
That's the difference between John McCain, Senator and John McCain, presidential candidate. Whatever way the wind blows...

That's exactly what I was going to say. Which is really sad, because I really liked John McCain as a senator. Could it be that he's just had a "change of heart," so to speak, and it really doesn't have anything to do with his candidacy? Politicians are still human, and are capable of changing their opinions.


So... does this mean that the Republicans are now the flip-flop party? And we'll get to see political ads with McCain windsurfing in the next two years?