PDA

View Full Version : Senate tied in knots by GOP filibusters; Filibuster frequency soars to new high


Richard Tafoya
Jul 21st, 2007, 08:50 PM
Why do Senate Republicans so deeply fear legislation that is supported by the majority of Americans?

McClatchy Newspapers:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/18218.html

This year Senate Republicans are threatening filibusters to block more legislation than ever before, a pattern that's rooted in — and could increase — the pettiness and dysfunction in Congress.

The trend has been evolving for 30 years. The reasons behind it are too complex to pin on one party. But it has been especially pronounced since the Democrats' razor-thin win in last year's election, giving them effectively a 51-49 Senate majority, and the Republicans' exile to the minority.


Seven months into the current two-year term, the Senate has held 42 "cloture" votes aimed at shutting off extended debate — filibusters, or sometimes only the threat of one — and moving to up-or-down votes on contested legislation. Under Senate rules that protect a minority's right to debate, these votes require a 60-vote supermajority in the 100-member Senate.


Democrats have trouble mustering 60 votes; they've fallen short 22 times so far this year. That's largely why they haven't been able to deliver on their campaign promises.


By sinking a cloture vote this week, Republicans successfully blocked a Democratic bid to withdraw combat troops from Iraq by April, even though a 52-49 Senate majority voted to end debate.


This year Republicans also have blocked votes on immigration legislation, a no-confidence resolution for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and major legislation dealing with energy, labor rights and prescription drugs.


Nearly 1 in 6 roll-call votes in the Senate this year have been cloture votes. If this pace of blocking legislation continues, this 110th Congress will be on track to roughly triple the previous record number of cloture votes — 58 each in the two Congresses from 1999-2002, according to the Senate Historical Office.

Venisenvy
Jul 21st, 2007, 11:40 PM
Wee unless i don't remember correctly it is democrats that started the most recent trend with the votes on judges. You reap what you sow.

Richard Tafoya
Jul 22nd, 2007, 12:16 AM
Here's a graph showing the detail of the current trend. Would that dip of 49 and 52 before the current Congress be the period where the Democratic minority filibustered Bush judge choices? (And for the record, 10 of Bush's judge nomination were filibustered by Democrats before a bi-partisan deal was reached to minimize filibustering of judge nominatons.)

That would seem to be a relief from the record 58 filibusters by the previous two Congress sessions.

http://media.mcclatchydc.com/smedia/2007/07/20/16/317-20070720-FILIBUSTERS.small.prod_affiliate.91.jpg

Regis Philbin
Jul 22nd, 2007, 10:39 PM
Yeah, the Dems are dragging their feet on the judges...no way would they ever approve another Supreme Court Justice before the '08 election.

Anyhoo, congratulations to the GOP for creating gridlock. This is the best news we've had in years! The fewer laws knucklehead politicians can pass the better off America will be. This is one reason Wall Street is doing so well this year. No new laws, taxes, regulations = good economic news.

Go GOP! http://planetsmilies.net/party-smiley-551.gif (http://planetsmilies.net)