PDA

View Full Version : So what would you do?..not ot


nickerbockerzzz
Sep 10th, 2007, 07:33 AM
What would you do if this happened to you..


Britney Spears was to perform under the magic of Chris Angel... but MTV freaked out at the last minute finding out what Britney was actually going to do. Supposedly, what Britney and Chris were planning was to do a set of mirrors and flotation. But when told to the Palms Hotel/Casino... the hotel flipped.

Insurance was the main problem, and the stage couldn't support the performance. MTV also freaked at the last minute because of their fear of being "too controversial" during the performance. Britney and Chris were furious with MTV's sad excuse and told Britney to change the performance at the last minute.

Britney's original performance was to infact appear and disappear. To float through the air... and for much mature dancing.

Britney overheard Sarah Silverman rehearsing her monologue in which she calls Britney's babies mistakes and takes jab after jab at Britney.

Britney made it very clear with MTV that Sarah was NOT allowed to talk about her kids, and MTV agreed. That big-mouthed b**** said it anyway.:noway:

source: breathheavy



so its mtv's fault!.... no wonder she didnt look like she was into it! ....Im sorry...i wouldnt have wanted to do it after that either... can ya blame her!

*DivaMia*
Sep 10th, 2007, 07:56 AM
she should have gone and punch her in the face lol

nickerbockerzzz
Sep 10th, 2007, 07:59 AM
she should have gone and punch her in the face lol




i agree! lmao!... its ok though ppl wil talk about it for a few days and then it will all be over..Britney is a strong girl and she will come back bigger and better than ever! no doubt

*DivaMia*
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:00 AM
i agree! lmao!... its ok though ppl wil talk about it for a few days and then it will all be over..Britney is a strong girl and she will come back bigger and better than ever! no doubt

yeah of course

soxfan1011
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:13 AM
Are you kidding me? You people have an excuse for everything.

Let's just say MTV did change plans. There is still no excuse to go out there and give it no effort. No excuse at all.

Even if she was upset that is no reason at all for her to completely mail it in.

nickerbockerzzz
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:14 AM
you ppl?.... ?????????

soxfan1011
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:17 AM
Yes, you Britney fans thar are so blinded that you will never criticize nor critique her no matter how much she may deserve it.

Her performance last night was a total flop. That has been universally recognized. Everybody is panning it for good reason, yet here people come up with an excuse.

Britney is not perfect. It is ok to criticize her. Just because you are a fan doesn't mean you cannot criticize her.

nickerbockerzzz
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:19 AM
wow you should have seen my post from last night it was quite critical...but i changed my mind after hearing the whole story...hmm go figure not everyone has all the facts...oh thats right i was supposed to know everything that went down before it had all come out!!...yeah.........btw its purley opinion on how she did not factual! if ya liked then good if ya didnt well thats fine to!

*DivaMia*
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:22 AM
Are you kidding me? You people have an excuse for everything.

Let's just say MTV did change plans. There is still no excuse to go out there and give it no effort. No excuse at all.

Even if she was upset that is no reason at all for her to completely mail it in.

excuse me !???! you people

Princess Serenity
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:22 AM
Bull****, it's not MTV's fault. MTV didn't say to Britney "Okay, strip down to your underwear, show off the body that you don't have, buy the worst extensions you can - the kind that they should pay YOU to wear - and go on stage with a vacant expression in your eyes without putting any effort into it whatsoever."

The old Britney would EASILY have salvaged that situation. She would've gone on stage in a killer outfit (even her Slave costume would look better than black underwear!), busted out some killer dance moves, and thrown all her effort into it. MTV didn't make her put no effort in it. She did.

*DivaMia*
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:25 AM
Yes, you Britney fans thar are so blinded that you will never criticize nor critique her no matter how much she may deserve it.

Her performance last night was a total flop. That has been universally recognized. Everybody is panning it for good reason, yet here people come up with an excuse.

Britney is not perfect. It is ok to criticize her. Just because you are a fan doesn't mean you cannot criticize her.


we are not saying that she was wonderful we know she sucked last night BUT she was having issues last night and her show was not right ANd no one has the right to talk about n e one kids like that

soxfan1011
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:27 AM
Here is an answer for you to what would you do.

If I were Britney I would have made the best of the situation. I would have been upset, but still gone out there and put my all into it.

Britney did not do that. And that is part of the reason she has become a joke. You want to know why people like Sarah Silverman make fun of Britney. Look at last night.

She had a chance to make a huge splash with her comeback. But, she was upset with MTV supposedly so she gives up. That isn't what a superstar does. That is what a loser does. That is why Britney has become such easy fodder for people like Sarah Silverman.

Britney quit on her performance, her fans and her comeback. Despite what MTV may or may not have done, the fact that Britney gave no effort is her own fault and there is nobody else to blame for that, not even MTV, Kfed, lawyers, or Sarah Silverman.

kristan
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:32 AM
I would have looked in a mirror, noticed I was a little too pudgy to go on stage and on T.V with no clothes on and put on some cover. After putting on some clothes I would have gone out there sang, not lip-synced and done some dance moves that ppl would still be talking about the next day. Britney has been around for over 10 years she is a professional entertainer there is no excuse for that horrible performance.

nickerbockerzzz
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:35 AM
Here is an answer for you to what would you do.

If I were Britney I would have made the best of the situation. I would have been upset, but still gone out there and put my all into it.

Britney did not do that. And that is part of the reason she has become a joke. You want to know why people like Sarah Silverman make fun of Britney. Look at last night.

She had a chance to make a huge splash with her comeback. But, she was upset with MTV supposedly so she gives up. That isn't what a superstar does. That is what a loser does. That is why Britney has become such easy fodder for people like Sarah Silverman.

Britney quit on her performance, her fans and her comeback. Despite what MTV may or may not have done, the fact that Britney gave no effort is her own fault and there is nobody else to blame for that, not even MTV, Kfed, lawyers, or Sarah Silverman.



I absolutely agree she should have put more into it...she looked less then enthused and she could have done better...but at the same time i understand why she didnt... no one had the right to go after her kids...im sure if Sarah was making fun of her that would be one thing...everyone makes fun of her... but to say that her children were mistakes...that was wrong! They are the victims in all of this!

nickerbockerzzz
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:36 AM
I would have looked in a mirror, noticed I was a little too pudgy to go on stage and on T.V with no clothes on and put on some cover. After putting on some clothes I would have gone out there sang, not lip-synced and done some dance moves that ppl would still be talking about the next day. Britney has been around for over 10 years she is a professional entertainer there is no excuse for that horrible performance.


Just so that I understand you correctly are you implying that only thin ppl should be on stage?:noway:

nickerbockerzzz
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:37 AM
Bull****, it's not MTV's fault. MTV didn't say to Britney "Okay, strip down to your underwear, show off the body that you don't have, buy the worst extensions you can - the kind that they should pay YOU to wear - and go on stage with a vacant expression in your eyes without putting any effort into it whatsoever."

The old Britney would EASILY have salvaged that situation. She would've gone on stage in a killer outfit (even her Slave costume would look better than black underwear!), busted out some killer dance moves, and thrown all her effort into it. MTV didn't make her put no effort in it. She did.


well i agree she should have put more effort into the performance! she looked bored as hell!

kristan
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:38 AM
Just so that I understand you correctly are you implying that only thin ppl should be on stage?:noway:
Pink is not thin but she is in shape. Beyonce is not thin but she is in shape. Britney is in a profession that judges image and she should be in shape if she is going to wear nothing on stage.

nickerbockerzzz
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:46 AM
So how is Britney the wrong one? Why arent the people who are simple minded and judge others wrong?...Why is it, that those who judge others because they are not "fit" enough get away with brain washing our society to see what "fit" is... thats why millions of ppl have died from eating disorders, and there are so many ppl have low self esteem!

so my question is... how is Going Against the Grain and not fitting in, wrong?

speedyforme
Sep 10th, 2007, 08:49 AM
eh the whole not looking fit is just a tiny aspect, no should realy care about her body, her appearance is diff, thought her make up and face looked nice, her hair, not so much

it's really the performance and energy she gave and the lackluster moves and lipsynching etc was just awful...a true professional and performer would tear the roof down and show that she is back regardless of that they say and do to her

kristan
Sep 10th, 2007, 09:10 AM
So how is Britney the wrong one? Why arent the people who are simple minded and judge others wrong?...Why is it, that those who judge others because they are not "fit" enough get away with brain washing our society to see what "fit" is... thats why millions of ppl have died from eating disorders, and there are so many ppl have low self esteem!

so my question is... how is Going Against the Grain and not fitting in, wrong?
It's just the way it is in todays world. Looks count, she's in a buisness where her looks are important and she didn't look goodl. Let's face it Britney is not a singer, she's cute, she's a good entertainer and a good dancer that's really all she has going for herself. Last night she didn't even have her looks or her dancing going for her. That's her fault.

jade.
Sep 10th, 2007, 09:13 AM
Bull****, it's not MTV's fault. MTV didn't say to Britney "Okay, strip down to your underwear, show off the body that you don't have, buy the worst extensions you can - the kind that they should pay YOU to wear - and go on stage with a vacant expression in your eyes without putting any effort into it whatsoever."

The old Britney would EASILY have salvaged that situation. She would've gone on stage in a killer outfit (even her Slave costume would look better than black underwear!), busted out some killer dance moves, and thrown all her effort into it. MTV didn't make her put no effort in it. She did.
Exactly!

tommyboy612
Sep 10th, 2007, 09:29 AM
Bull****, it's not MTV's fault. MTV didn't say to Britney "Okay, strip down to your underwear, show off the body that you don't have, buy the worst extensions you can - the kind that they should pay YOU to wear - and go on stage with a vacant expression in your eyes without putting any effort into it whatsoever."

The old Britney would EASILY have salvaged that situation. She would've gone on stage in a killer outfit (even her Slave costume would look better than black underwear!), busted out some killer dance moves, and thrown all her effort into it. MTV didn't make her put no effort in it. She did.


I KNOW RIGHT!!!...If Brit KNEW sarah was going to talk about her kids...make a smart statment about it..WAIT SHE CANT DO THAT WITHOUT A TEAM BEHIND HER...nevermind it would have worked if she was smart.

If she had a killer performance and made astatment somehow of Sarah being worng about what she was saying it would have been eggs on Sarahs face.

My thing is you can have a 100 excuses which the BRIT STANS do but its already said and done. MTV never shys away from contraversy...maybe they knew brit would bomb and wanted it live.

tommyboy612
Sep 10th, 2007, 09:32 AM
So how is Britney the wrong one? Why arent the people who are simple minded and judge others wrong?...Why is it, that those who judge others because they are not "fit" enough get away with brain washing our society to see what "fit" is... thats why millions of ppl have died from eating disorders, and there are so many ppl have low self esteem!

so my question is... how is Going Against the Grain and not fitting in, wrong?


LMAO...wow!

How is brit going against the grain? HOW...by being a mother of two?

Brit looked a mess. Her music is going against ANY grain...maybe her badly lip syncing is going againt the talent grain but thats about it.

Cubasterd
Sep 10th, 2007, 09:52 AM
Either way, she should have come up with something better than that. She embarrassed herself and disappointed her fans. She failed. I don't hate her for it but she did disappoint the hell out of me. She needs to do a REAL performance for her fans to make up for ... that.

~Jenna~
Sep 10th, 2007, 10:13 AM
what exactly did that sarah girl say? is it on youtube?
its totally uncalled for to offend her kids even if u dont like britney, that is just really low from her

silvergirl
Sep 10th, 2007, 10:38 AM
I don't find anything wrong with her body. However, that outfit she was wearing during the performance did not look good on her, at all. She should have noticed that, and worn something more flattering. She should not have lip synced. If she absolutely had to lip sync, she should have done a better job of it. There were times her lips weren't even moving. And no matter who she was mad at and how she was feeling at the time, she should have given that performance her all. Instead, she looked bored and lethargic. As she is a show business professional, there is really no excuse for that.

Xtina4Prez
Sep 10th, 2007, 10:56 AM
I am sure they knew what she was doing weeks in advance. If that was the case she would have been up all night rehearsing and not at Diddys party also Brit has enough pull on MTV to have gotten Sarah kicked off the show or even censored had she really "overheard" what was going to be said.

Back to the insurance issues, that Chris Angel crap had been floating around radio and Internet for weeks or do you believe that they really changed it up at the last min. puh leeeze! even if she had the same choreography & the same set up the performance would not have sucked had she worn an outfit appropriate to her figure & actually danced (like her back up dancers were doing) and had some damn expression on her face.

TurnOffTheLight
Sep 10th, 2007, 12:16 PM
Just so that I understand you correctly are you implying that only thin ppl should be on stage?:noway: nobody said that, but if that outfit just looks horrible on you, wear something that looks good, it's not that hard.

aleronihead
Sep 10th, 2007, 12:30 PM
Bull****, it's not MTV's fault. MTV didn't say to Britney "Okay, strip down to your underwear, show off the body that you don't have, buy the worst extensions you can - the kind that they should pay YOU to wear - and go on stage with a vacant expression in your eyes without putting any effort into it whatsoever."

The old Britney would EASILY have salvaged that situation. She would've gone on stage in a killer outfit (even her Slave costume would look better than black underwear!), busted out some killer dance moves, and thrown all her effort into it. MTV didn't make her put no effort in it. She did.

EXACTLY.

I highly doubt MTV would scrap a majorly hyped performance at the last minute. They would be in on whatever the plan was, and they would have approved rehearsals etc.

Obviously something did go wrong or she just wasn't ready, but I she deserves a major part of the blame here. The entire reason that the performance completely FAILED was because of the lack of energy and effort. If she'd just tried to dance or lip sync better, we'd at least be able to say she tried.

aleronihead
Sep 10th, 2007, 12:31 PM
So how is Britney the wrong one? Why arent the people who are simple minded and judge others wrong?...Why is it, that those who judge others because they are not "fit" enough get away with brain washing our society to see what "fit" is... thats why millions of ppl have died from eating disorders, and there are so many ppl have low self esteem!

so my question is... how is Going Against the Grain and not fitting in, wrong?

What? I didn't understand that.

BABYGIRL121280
Sep 10th, 2007, 12:57 PM
Sure she might have been upset that they cancelled the Criss Angel thing but u know what an artist still performs. Which she didnt! I love Britney! But this was horrible. I know some other artists that had to perform even if they were upset. I mean think of Celine Dion, when her dad died she still did her concert that night. She said that ppl came to see so she was going to go on stage. Sure she cried but hey she still delivered.

kortney1386
Sep 10th, 2007, 04:35 PM
if thats true i wouldnt have even went on stage, sure all of us fans wanted to see her but i woulda laughed my A$$ off if she was like "*** u MTv" and walked away n left them with no performer.

sara silverman was messed up for doin that. And shoulda got kicked outta there,shes not even a good comedian.

jimmyboy
Sep 10th, 2007, 04:48 PM
What.Everrr. She sucked, it was nobody's fault but her. It was not that she didn't practiced the moves, SHE WASN?T MOVING AT ALL!!!!!

Stop making up excuses, because I am starting to believe her fans are getting what they deserve and nothing better.,

Cubasterd
Sep 10th, 2007, 04:57 PM
What.Everrr. She sucked, it was nobody's fault but her. It was not that she didn't practiced the moves, SHE WASN?T MOVING AT ALL!!!!!

Stop making up excuses, because I am starting to believe her fans are getting what they deserve and nothing better.,
Well, if you're not a fan then.. why do you care what we get? lol Are we really THAT interesting? :)
But yea, she wasn't dancing at all and if this report is true then at least we know the reason why she wasn't into the performance. Anyway, there was a reason why she didn't bother moving her lips or keeping up with the dancing.

lebma88
Sep 10th, 2007, 05:26 PM
she def didn't look into it, that wasn't the normal britney everyones used to as far as being an entertainer....i could believe that she was pissed that Sarah Silverman had plans on saying crap about her kids, its one thing to bash her but you don't say stuff about her kids, knowing myself I'd probably be pissed as hell too and not go on there with a fake ass smile, nonetheless she looked COMPLETELY bored lol...but i still have some hope left for her... :)

I bet if it was Radio City Music hall she could have done what she initially wanted ebcause taht stage is much much bigger..

susan1218
Sep 10th, 2007, 07:17 PM
I don't believe Criss was ever really involved in the performance. Look at this video, he says he really has very little to do with Britney's performance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzF3qDvCNp0

jade.
Sep 11th, 2007, 02:07 AM
It's sad to see fans actually enjoyed that mess. You'd think years of waiting for a comeback she'd atleast do something great for her fans but that? Pfft.

AngelCarterOnlin
Sep 11th, 2007, 01:27 PM
alright im not speaking as a fan here..im speaking as a normal viewer of her performance..so dont come back at me saying "oh she just said that cause she's a britney fan"..yeah i am a fan, but im just saying what i feel

her performance wasn't what it was hyped up to be..and even if mtv did change the plans on her, she should have done her best. i admit, i can see where the whole sarah silverman thing would have been behind why she seemed so upset..that would have upset me. and i was sitting there watching sarahs lil "bit" and i wanted to throw something at my tv. if she has to stand there and make jokes about innocent babies just to get ppl to laugh at her..she shouldn't even be considered a comedian and definately shouldn't be up there onstage. its one thing to take cracks at britney and other celebs, but to take cracks at her babies and call them "mistakes"..im sorry, but if i was britney hearing that..i would have been upset and not able to do a performance too

soxfan1011
Sep 11th, 2007, 02:10 PM
If Britney can't perform after hearing a joke then she should be finished.

If she is any kind of professional you would still be able to go on after something like that. This is just another excuse.

If Britney is so fragile now that hearing a joke by a B list celeb like Sarah Silverman is enough to knock her off her game then she shouldn't be performing any longer anyways.

AngelCarterOnlin
Sep 11th, 2007, 03:48 PM
like i have said many times over and i guess i have to keep repeating myself to you ppl!

i dont think she was ready either..and im not saying that her performance was good cause it wasn't. but my god..it was ONE!