PDA

View Full Version : Britney is on the cover of Blender


Elroy Jetson
Jan 28th, 2008, 03:03 PM
http://i26.tinypic.com/zwais.jpg

It's obviously Brit's head on someone else's body. Anyhow, it's kind of obvious what the article is about... the writer interviewed several people in the Britney camp, former and current.

Britney is slated to grace the cover of next week's Rolling Stone as well.

jade.
Jan 28th, 2008, 03:06 PM
I was just gonna post this!
& yeah, you can tell her head is on someone else's body - those aren't even her hands.

full article here (http://www.blender.com/BritneySpearsTheRoadtoRuin/articles/12402.aspx).

Cubasterd
Jan 28th, 2008, 03:17 PM
Yea, they even say its a composite of pictures because she refused to talk to them.
They worked for months on this article. The first part was documented before Britney 'took' Adnan.
I like the article. Its a gives a nice open recap of all the personal stuff that has happened to her.

julie.
Jan 28th, 2008, 03:18 PM
she looks like Jessica Simpson there

Elroy Jetson
Jan 28th, 2008, 03:40 PM
wtf?... did they also photoshop the redness in her eyes?

Cubasterd
Jan 28th, 2008, 03:46 PM
Someone at BMK said it was from this photoshoot>
http://www.britneyspears.bz/gallery/data/1872/654britneyspears-dot-bz_modeling2003-glamouruk-023.jpg

The shoot itself doesn't look that airbrushed, so they probably didn't do anything to it.

heavenwaits_22
Jan 28th, 2008, 04:40 PM
They are ruining their chance of ever having Britney on their cover. I didn't get the memo of Blender becoming a tabloid magazine. I thought it was about the music for them?

This looks like a cry out from blender that they need more sales. It just looks like a desperate need on their part. Not to mention if I hear them trying to really get on the cover then that would be beyond desperate.

Beutifulstranger
Jan 28th, 2008, 04:55 PM
I ont get the point of this? why did they have her on the cover if she didnt want to pose?

heavenwaits_22
Jan 28th, 2008, 05:05 PM
I ont get the point of this? why did they have her on the cover if she didnt want to pose?That's not her body on the cover it's just her face. If anyone has seen the new video of her dancing you can see her body is toned and wouldn't need to be photo shopped at all.

I have different scenarios in my head of what probably happened. They probably asked her to do an interview, and
a photo shoot and she probably didn't want to at the time so
they just back stabbed her and did this ridiculous cover/interview instead (which really isn't an interview)

Or they just want sales.

tiger_rascal
Jan 28th, 2008, 05:19 PM
Thats just wrong. Can she sue them? I would hope so. That "cover" only makes her image appear even worse!

heavenwaits_22
Jan 28th, 2008, 05:30 PM
This is like the same thing Playboy did with Jessica Alba. She posed for another magazine or something and Playboy splashed that picture on their cover.

thecodeman18
Jan 28th, 2008, 05:43 PM
its probably hotter than anything a real new photoshoot of her would produce anyways, so go for it!!!

heavenwaits_22
Jan 28th, 2008, 06:58 PM
its probably hotter than anything a real new photoshoot of her would produce anyways, so go for it!!!Hardly. Britney's body looks amazing. Plus make up she can look awesome.

Sorry but look at Fergie. No amount of make up or photo shop can change her face. At least Britney has striking features and knows what to do with her face for photo shoots. Her eyes, her lips, smile are all great features.

Danster
Jan 28th, 2008, 08:19 PM
its probably hotter than anything a real new photoshoot of her would produce anyways, so go for it!!!
ROTFL, so true.

Lucky_19
Jan 28th, 2008, 09:49 PM
They dont have any real pics they can use?

Beutifulstranger
Jan 29th, 2008, 06:23 PM
That's not her body on the cover it's just her face. If anyone has seen the new video of her dancing you can see her body is toned and wouldn't need to be photo shopped at all.

I have different scenarios in my head of what probably happened. They probably asked her to do an interview, and
a photo shoot and she probably didn't want to at the time so
they just back stabbed her and did this ridiculous cover/interview instead (which really isn't an interview)

Or they just want sales.

oh ok... Well that sucks on Blanders behalf :noway:

tommyboy612
Jan 29th, 2008, 06:51 PM
They are ruining their chance of ever having Britney on their cover. I didn't get the memo of Blender becoming a tabloid magazine. I thought it was about the music for them?

This looks like a cry out from blender that they need more sales. It just looks like a desperate need on their part. Not to mention if I hear them trying to really get on the cover then that would be beyond desperate.


you think they care at this point?


If Brit makes a come back I bet she wont hold anything agaist anyone...because they have ALL made fun of her.

I anywho, I was stuck on that pic for a second...but I guess it was a good idea to do that since she isnt having photo shoots.

tommyboy612
Jan 29th, 2008, 07:05 PM
that was a good read. They have everything pretty much down. I like how they went thru it all from start to finish...

I can understand how the stans feel but you cant say this wasnt ALL tru and not biased


I mean Brit doesnt do interviews...why would they be mad..its expected. Also she was the biggest tabloid fodder in 2008...so read the title of the magz...she fits having a photo shooped picture up

heavenwaits_22
Jan 29th, 2008, 08:33 PM
that was a good read. They have everything pretty much down. I like how they went thru it all from start to finish...

I can understand how the stans feel but you cant say this wasnt ALL tru and not biased


I mean Brit doesnt do interviews...why would they be mad..its expected. Also she was the biggest tabloid fodder in 2008...so read the title of the magz...she fits having a photo shooped picture upShe's still most likely getting a lot of phone calls from different magazines wanting to be the first magazine to interview her. I have no doubt now that Blender did the same thing, and Britney said no to them. This is just like the classic case of Ok Magazine. Britney opted out of the interview and OK magazine made up a crazy story about her photos being "the worst thing ever in the entire world."

That's exactly how they announced it. "People will be shocked, and appalled by these photos." I actually remember different employees going on different entertainment shows and saying the pictures were the worst thing they've seen. The milked the entire thing. The photos came out and Britney looks beautiful. It was their own fault that there was bad photo shopping going on. Not Britney's.