PDA

View Full Version : Romney says he'd take Veep, calls McCain "Big Dog"


Regis Philbin
Mar 11th, 2008, 06:38 PM
http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0308/Romney_says_hed_take_Veep_calls_McCain_Big_Dog.html

Romney says he'd take Veep, calls McCain "Big Dog"

Mitt Romney said in his first interview since departing the GOP race that he would accept the number two position on the ticket and that there is no lingering bitterness between him and John McCain.

“I think any Republican leader in this country would be honored to be asked to serve as the vice presidential nominee, myself included," Romney told FOX's Sean Hannity in a broadcast set to air tonight. "Of course this is a nation which needs strong leadership. And if the nominee of our party asked you to serve with him, anybody would be honored to receive that call … and to accept it, of course.”

According to two separate reports, Romney is being talked up as a running mate by members of the Bush inner circle. But McCain and his closest advisers have little regard for their former rival thanks to the bitter, year-long race waged between the two Republicans.

Romney says, however, that he thinks the wounds have healed.

“There are really no hard feelings, I don't think, on either side of this," he said in the interview. "There were no pacts and so forth that make people feel like that we will never come together. Instead these campaigns are all coming together. We are supporting our nominee enthusiastically, aggressively."

Romney said his top fundraisers have already met with McCain's campaign.

Richard Tafoya
Mar 11th, 2008, 07:30 PM
It's sad when losers come begging for scraps.

tiger_rascal
Mar 11th, 2008, 07:39 PM
Just what I was thinking Richard. :roll:

Richard Tafoya
Mar 11th, 2008, 07:47 PM
Besides, McCain needs someone who will attract voters, not repel them. Granted, he'll lose either way, but at least give it an honest try since it's your last time around, John.

Venisenvy
Mar 11th, 2008, 08:06 PM
Don't sell John too short Richard. I think that McCainn has the ability to run a pretty good campaign and it's way too early to be claiming the democrat the automatic winner.

tiger_rascal
Mar 11th, 2008, 08:58 PM
Its looking very good though for the democrats. So good in fact it appears their only competition is among themselves!

SparkleHugs
Mar 11th, 2008, 09:44 PM
Who do you think would be a better VP choice?

pinky
Mar 11th, 2008, 10:28 PM
No one. The GOP is a one trick pony right now.

Venisenvy
Mar 11th, 2008, 10:53 PM
It was a sure thing for Al Gore too, after Bush's first 4 years it was a pretty sure thing for Kerry but then look what happened. All I'm saying is that there is no such thing as a sure thing and if you underestimate your opponent, well you might just get an unexpected knock out blow.

tiger_rascal
Mar 12th, 2008, 06:34 AM
Didnt Al actually win the popular vote, but Bush won the electoral college?

If the trends keep up its looking great for the democrats.

Annoyedlistner
Mar 12th, 2008, 07:55 AM
It was a sure thing for Al Gore too, after Bush's first 4 years it was a pretty sure thing for Kerry but then look what happened. All I'm saying is that there is no such thing as a sure thing and if you underestimate your opponent, well you might just get an unexpected knock out blow.

Kerry was a weak opponent.

Gore did have more votes than Bush did...i know that gets old hearing that, but its a proven fact.

Remember Republicans dont think its right for everyone's votes to count.

LesterX
Mar 12th, 2008, 09:07 AM
Didnt Al actually win the popular vote, but Bush won the electoral college?


I'd say a more accurate description is Gore won the popular vote, Bush won the Supreme Court vote.

pinky
Mar 12th, 2008, 03:54 PM
It was a sure thing for Al Gore too, after Bush's first 4 years it was a pretty sure thing for Kerry but then look what happened. All I'm saying is that there is no such thing as a sure thing and if you underestimate your opponent, well you might just get an unexpected knock out blow.
I was referring to the VP choice.

There's no one in the GOP other than McCain who has proven he can get votes.

Venisenvy
Mar 12th, 2008, 10:21 PM
Well they dont always need a VP that is proven. A VP just has to have the right credentials to help out. Who was Cheney, he hadn't proven to get votes and in 2000 he was instrumental for Bush's win because he was seen as someone that didnt have enough foreign policy experience but he did have a VP that had tons of it so in the end it was ok because the ticket balanced out. All McCainn needs to find a good republican that balances the ticket and he could make his chances better. We don't always realize who those people are till they are picked and we get to know them.