PDA

View Full Version : Britney really is a legend.


kristina
Apr 8th, 2008, 12:37 AM
Seriously.

She is probably the most famous person on the planet right now, and she has a legacy that will be remembered for years.

Granted, she's not the most talented pop star, but she's definitely the most influential. She completely changed the way pop princesses were "packaged"; in a way that even Madonna didn't.

"Britney/Brittany" is such a common name, unlike the uniqueness of other divas like Madonna, Mariah, Beyoncé etc., yet she's made it completely synonymous with HER.

Her videos are iconic, her songs are iconic, her whole life is iconic.

Slayer4Xtina
Apr 8th, 2008, 12:43 AM
Yes she's a legend indeed! :love:

ghettoguy
Apr 8th, 2008, 05:31 AM
"Pop Princesses" are played out. It went out when 2000 came in. It would be something if she "influenced" something that was still current and that carried on.

tiger_rascal
Apr 8th, 2008, 06:20 AM
One thing that I've noticed. Britney has not tried to drastically change her image or sound. Britney has stayed true to Britney. I respect that. When other artists try to change too much, it appears as though they are trying too hard.

Coolbeanz
Apr 8th, 2008, 09:20 AM
You've lost all sense of meaning on the Legend concept, Kristinay :noway:

I blame Christina.

Hemingway
Apr 8th, 2008, 09:29 AM
Its not all about music... Britney is an international legend, superstar, her fame is insane.... she is the most famous person of our lifetimes (even more famous than Madonna). She is still the most talked about person on the planet. Her music flops... her music sells... who really cares? Its Britney Bitch!

aleronihead
Apr 8th, 2008, 09:42 AM
She's an icon of our generation without a doubt. But she's not a legend, not yet. Time will have to tell.

Nix
Apr 8th, 2008, 09:44 AM
The Legendary Mess :sick:

tiger_rascal
Apr 8th, 2008, 09:50 AM
The Legendary, Influential, Britney Spears!!!

Black Velvet
Apr 8th, 2008, 10:43 AM
Its not all about music... Britney is an international legend, superstar, her fame is insane.... she is the most famous person of our lifetimes (even more famous than Madonna). She is still the most talked about person on the planet. Her music flops... her music sells... who really cares? Its Britney Bitch!
word....

Hemingway
Apr 8th, 2008, 10:51 AM
The Legendary, Influential, Britney Spears!!!
Yep. I give both Britney and Madonna ALOT of credit for inspiring the current batch of popstars - Miley Cyrus, Christina Aguilera, Ashley Tisdale etc. :nod:

Danster
Apr 8th, 2008, 11:15 AM
Britney is as legendary as Paris Hilton
there's a difference between being famous and infamous.

heavenwaits_22
Apr 8th, 2008, 12:29 PM
Britney.

Paris has offered nothing of substance. People know Britney for her performances, her songs, her videos. Yeah people know her for the tabloids also but that's the only thing people know Paris from. Britney is an international superstar. All over the world I've seen so many people comment on Britney from Ireland, Australia, Japan, etc and they could give two *****s about the tabloids. She is truely our queen of this generation.

tiger_rascal
Apr 8th, 2008, 12:31 PM
Its hard to admit it for some, but its true, she is the Legendary, Influential, Queen, Britney.

heavenwaits_22
Apr 8th, 2008, 12:42 PM
Its hard to admit it for some, but its true, she is the Legendary, Influential, Queen, Britney.:D :sunny:

aleronihead
Apr 8th, 2008, 12:53 PM
Britney.

Paris has offered nothing of substance. People know Britney for her performances, her songs, her videos. Yeah people know her for the tabloids also but that's the only thing people know Paris from. Britney is an international superstar. All over the world I've seen so many people comment on Britney from Ireland, Australia, Japan, etc and they could give two *****s about the tabloids. She is truely our queen of this generation.
While it's true that she gained her notoriety through controversial performances and videos, and the occasional massive hit (Baby, Oops, and Toxic primarily), you can't deny that right now she is known for her tabloid antics. Her history of performances has gotten lost in the shuffle since around 2004/2005, which is a pretty long time.

marlon
Apr 8th, 2008, 01:11 PM
Its hard to admit it for some, but its true, she is the Legendary, Influential, Queen, Britney.

lol...well said! :nod:

heavenwaits_22
Apr 8th, 2008, 02:19 PM
While it's true that she gained her notoriety through controversial performances and videos, and the occasional massive hit (Baby, Oops, and Toxic primarily), you can't deny that right now she is known for her tabloid antics. Her history of performances has gotten lost in the shuffle since around 2004/2005, which is a pretty long time.Gimme More, and Piece of Me were huge worldwide. They are even still charting in most worldwide charts. Someone who wasn't even promoting had higher charting songs this year than some who promoted their singles/albums.

aleronihead
Apr 8th, 2008, 02:31 PM
I'm not saying her material isn't good. I'm just saying a lot of people have a hard time remembering her at the top of her game right now.

jade.
Apr 8th, 2008, 03:00 PM
I'm not saying her material isn't good. I'm just saying a lot of people have a hard time remembering her at the top of her game right now.
:nod:

If you ask someone 'what do you know about Britney Spears' or something like that they'd answer with something about her personal life. Her music isn't something people talk about, never has really.

Coolbeanz
Apr 8th, 2008, 04:16 PM
Its hard to admit it for some, but its true, she is the Legendary, Influential, Queen, Britney.
No wonder the world is at the edge of of its end...

nexus
Apr 8th, 2008, 04:49 PM
lmao@ her music being something people never talked about. +80 million records and several worldwide hits in less than 10 years sure prove that.

yeah, she's a legend. maybe not just yet but she's definitely waaaay ahead of any other artist from that generation. 30 years from now she will be remembered as THE leading pop star of the 00s and all the others will be just... good singers lol (and there will be a xtopher fan arguing that she was just popular because of tabloids :laugh:)

Danster
Apr 8th, 2008, 06:37 PM
mmm and the BSB sold like +120 million records... point?
call Britney a Legend if you want, but truth is she's a "Has Been"

Danster
Apr 8th, 2008, 06:54 PM
Britney.

Paris has offered nothing of substance. People know Britney for her performances, her songs, her videos. Yeah people know her for the tabloids also but that's the only thing people know Paris from. Britney is an international superstar. All over the world I've seen so many people comment on Britney from Ireland, Australia, Japan, etc and they could give two *****s about the tabloids. She is truely our queen of this generation.
you act like Britney is the only lip syncher in the world that has fans outside the US LMAO, JLo does too ;)

oh, and by the way, if people from all those places you named care about Britney's music and not her personal life, how come they didn't care to buy Blackout? :greyno:

nexus
Apr 8th, 2008, 07:42 PM
mmm and the BSB sold like +120 million records... point?
call Britney a Legend if you want, but truth is she's a "Has Been"

did you even read what I wrote? I mentioned her sales because it's ridiculous to say that no one has ever cared about her music when she's the biggest selling female artist of the decade. :p

and that sucks for you lol coz being a has-been she still manages to have the hits that xtopher could only dream of :greyno:

heavenwaits_22
Apr 8th, 2008, 10:02 PM
did you even read what I wrote? I mentioned her sales because it's ridiculous to say that no one has ever cared about her music when she's the biggest selling female artist of the decade. :p

and that sucks for you lol coz being a has-been she still manages to have the hits that xtopher could only dream of :greyno:A Has Been that never even promoted her work and still did better than someone who promoted so much. rofl :hah:

Danster
Apr 8th, 2008, 10:08 PM
how much better? :susp2:
I think u're just talking single-wise

heavenwaits_22
Apr 8th, 2008, 10:09 PM
how much better? :susp2:
I think u're just talking single-wiseSuch an idiot. Of course I am.

But selling 2 million without any promotion for Blackout in 6 months is better than Christina's 4 million in 2 years.

jade.
Apr 9th, 2008, 03:56 AM
A Has Been that never even promoted her work and still did better than someone who promoted so much. rofl :funny:
When you say someone it's always about Christina, quit it for crying out loud. She never promoted SO much, the only single she promoted was ANOM. Hurt & Candyman were practically pushed under the carpet.

lmao@ her music being something people never talked about. +80 million records and several worldwide hits in less than 10 years sure prove that.
Um, since when in the past 3-4 years was her music talked about in magazines, on TV or the general public mentioned it? None from what I've seen. People are still gonna buy her music because it's good modern music but the media aren't interested in that, the whole world talks more about her personal life now then what her music was ever talked about. So yes, her music isn't exactly something people do talk about.

(another one who has jumped on the bandwagon with that lame xtopher sh*t). :greyno:

But selling 2 million without any promotion for Blackout in 6 months is better than Christina's 4 million in 2 years.
How many times will it take for this to get through your head? Britney's music released from BO is decent music, music the general public are interested in. The singles released from B2B were anything but that, not to mention the fact it was a double album - another thing people like you forget to remember that those aren't always successful. 4 million in 2 years? doesn't matter to Christina, she can still go on tour & sell out whether she sells 12 million or 4. :]

Hemingway
Apr 9th, 2008, 05:18 AM
Britney had more top 10 hits in the UK with BO than tranny did with her tour for B2B... she toured the week of Hurts release in the UK and it still bombed. :hah:

The problem is that nobody is interested in Christina anymore. Sure, Britney is a mess, but millions are routing for her to make a huge comeback! It will be the biggest comeback ever. Unlike Christina... who boringly has just continued to fade into the background. Oh well...

Danster
Apr 9th, 2008, 08:10 AM
Britney had more top 10 hits in the UK with BO than tranny did with her tour for B2B... she toured the week of Hurts release in the UK and it still bombed. :hah:

The problem is that nobody is interested in Christina anymore. Sure, Britney is a mess, but millions are routing for her to make a huge comeback! It will be the biggest comeback ever. Unlike Christina... who boringly has just continued to fade into the background. Oh well...

:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
I guess you are still living in August 2007

The biggest comeback ever already happened
http://youtube.com/watch?v=jK-T5Y1ZeVg
:arrow:

aleronihead
Apr 9th, 2008, 08:19 AM
Such an idiot. Of course I am.

But selling 2 million without any promotion for Blackout in 6 months is better than Christina's 4 million in 2 years.
To be fair, Britney does inspire her rabid fans to buy dozens of copies and support her more fiercely and blindly than many other pop stars' fans. She has lost many fans, but the ones who remain loyal remain incredibly loyal.

NaturalTina
Apr 9th, 2008, 08:21 AM
Britney had more top 10 hits in the UK with BO than tranny did with her tour for B2B... she toured the week of Hurts release in the UK and it still bombed. :hah:

The problem is that nobody is interested in Christina anymore. Sure, Britney is a mess, but millions are routing for her to make a huge comeback! It will be the biggest comeback ever. Unlike Christina... who boringly has just continued to fade into the background. Oh well...

Wow, you really are playing both sides of the coin, aren't you? You try to act all objective on the Christina board, and you come over here and call her tranny?

aleronihead
Apr 9th, 2008, 08:23 AM
Britney had more top 10 hits in the UK with BO than tranny did with her tour for B2B... she toured the week of Hurts release in the UK and it still bombed. :hah:

The problem is that nobody is interested in Christina anymore. Sure, Britney is a mess, but millions are routing for her to make a huge comeback! It will be the biggest comeback ever. Unlike Christina... who boringly has just continued to fade into the background. Oh well...
Ugh, please. Hurt didn't do well overall because it wasn't a great single and the song was depressing as hell.

But didn't it actually do GREAT in Europe? I didn't follow the charts but I recall that fact being thrown around quite a but.

Considering that most of Britney's singles have charted poorly in America and fans turn to Euro and UK charts and the fact that her songs are "hits" even if they don't chart well...there sure is a lot of hypocrisy in this thread.

tiger_rascal
Apr 9th, 2008, 08:37 AM
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
I guess you are still living in August 2007

The biggest comeback ever already happened
http://youtube.com/watch?v=jK-T5Y1ZeVg
:arrow:

That makes no sense. :susp2:

You are talking about before the intervention. Before the stay at UCLA medical center. Before she was actually diagnosed with a mental issue.

When we talk about a comeback, we are talking about after all that. And its clear she is starting to get better and better.

:D

~Crybaby~
Apr 9th, 2008, 09:27 AM
I wouldn't consider her a legend yet, but I do think she's well on here way. When you look at real legends like Mariah, Whitney and Madonna, they have classic albums, songs that will stand the test of time and career longevity out of this world. Like them, Britney is one of, if not the best seller of her generation and she is definitely popular, but I think it's for the wrong reasons. When people can tell you about her reason public mishap before they can list her current single, there's a problem. I don't think any of her albums will down as classics, and I don't think any of her songs aside from her first single will stand the test of time. As an artist she just doesn't have it yet. Madonna had "Ray Of Light", Whitney had "The Bodyguard" Mariah had "Daydream". Their singles "I Will Always Love You", "One Sweet Day" "We Belong Together" "Hero" "I Have Nothing", ect are the soundtracks for people lives and are still being played, used for auditions, and they just raised the bar in almost every way. I don't think Britney's had that impact just yet. I'm not saying she won't or doesn't have the potential to, but her discography just doesn't seem legendary to me. I think the people that are calling her a legend are basing that off of her popularity as a tabloid figure, I don't agree. I think it takes more to become a real legend.

One thing that I've noticed. Britney has not tried to drastically change her image or sound. Britney has stayed true to Britney. I respect that. When other artists try to change too much, it appears as though they are trying too hard.

lol @ this. It couldn't be more obvious that this is a dig towards Christina Aguilera. I could understand something like this in retaliation to a negative comment, but you being catty for no reason is just sad and says a lot. There was no reason to even mention that, it's unnecessary and it has no relevance to the topic at hand. It's funny because you're always telling people to grow up. When you start taking your own advice you'd be much better off.

tiger_rascal
Apr 9th, 2008, 09:33 AM
lol @ this. It couldn't be more obvious that this is a dig towards Christina Aguilera. I could understand something like this in retaliation to a negative comment, but you being catty for no reason is just sad and says a lot. There was no reason to even mention that, it's unnecessary and it has no relevance to the topic at hand. It's funny because you're always telling people to grow up. When you start taking your own advice you'd be much better off.

I didnt mention any names. I actually had several artists in mind. Its funny that you would automatically think of Christina first. :nc:

~Crybaby~
Apr 9th, 2008, 09:40 AM
I've seen some of your posts about Christina in her forum, that's why. There's no need for that, keep the discussion cool and clean.

tiger_rascal
Apr 9th, 2008, 09:48 AM
Once again, I never brought her up, you did.

I had several artists in mind. And I wasnt going to bother going into detail.

Britney is the only one among them that has not changed too much. At least, not artistically speaking.

~Crybaby~
Apr 9th, 2008, 10:01 AM
Once again, I never brought her up, you did.

I had several artists in mind. And I wasnt going to bother going into detail.

Britney is the only one among them that has not changed too much. At least, not artistically speaking.

Because it would hypocritical for you to do so, so you make implications instead and then act like you have no idea what people are talking about when you get called out. Predictable. :laugh:

And lol @ Britney's ability to stay consistently mediocre and her regression as far as her involvement and artistic effort into record making being applaued. I'm not even hating, but I don't see how anyone can find that to be a good thing. WTF :crazy:

jade.
Apr 9th, 2008, 10:14 AM
Britney had more top 10 hits in the UK with BO than tranny did with her tour for B2B... she toured the week of Hurts release in the UK and it still bombed. :hah:

The problem is that nobody is interested in Christina anymore. Sure, Britney is a mess, but millions are routing for her to make a huge comeback! It will be the biggest comeback ever. Unlike Christina... who boringly has just continued to fade into the background. Oh well...
You talk some sh*t. Top 10 hits with BO? She has only released 3 songs off the damn album. You WISH her toured bombed, it had 96-100% attendance every night, fool. That's all you keep saying too, no one is interested in Christina. It's obvious there is if people like you won't stop talking about her. You say you're a fan then come up with that sh*t just to blend in with everyone else on this forum, you do the exact same thing on the CA forum. It's actually you who is the boring one, same sh*t over & over.

If you're so uninterested in her then quit acting like you have this fan thing going on, forget about her & move on.

Slayer4Xtina
Apr 9th, 2008, 10:18 AM
Britney isnt a legend!

Here's a real legend ever since birth!

http://i25.tinypic.com/5me0c1.jpg

Vamp
Apr 9th, 2008, 10:22 AM
You talk some sh*t. Top 10 hits with BO? She has only released 3 songs off the damn album. That's all you keep saying too, no one is interested in Christina. It's obvious there is if people like you won't stop talking about her. You say you're a fan then come up with that sh*t just to blend in with everyone else on this forum, you do the exact same thing on the CA forum. It's actually you who is the boring one, same sh*t over & over.

If you're so uninterested in her then quit acting like you have this fan thing going on, forget about her & move on.

Before anyone jumps to any conclusions this thread was the one that was advertised on the homepage.

Fear not my child. Pipi has been banned. :nod:

aleronihead
Apr 9th, 2008, 11:14 AM
Ha, again? He just needs to learn how to play well with others and not be a sociopath (word of the week).

heavenwaits_22
Apr 9th, 2008, 01:14 PM
To be fair, Britney does inspire her rabid fans to buy dozens of copies and support her more fiercely and blindly than many other pop stars' fans. She has lost many fans, but the ones who remain loyal remain incredibly loyal.You can't be serious. There's at least one thread every month on Christina's board that asks for people to buy her albums again. You act like Britney fans are the only ones who bought multiple copies. It happens with almost any fanbase. Way to be stereotypical again.

Reini
Apr 9th, 2008, 02:54 PM
Lol @ calling Britney a legend. Should we crown her that she acted like a total mess the last months?

lonely3
Apr 9th, 2008, 04:32 PM
You can't be serious. There's at least one thread every month on Christina's board that asks for people to buy her albums again. You act like Britney fans are the only ones who bought multiple copies. It happens with almost any fanbase. Way to be stereotypical again.

Christina fans are the most hypocritical people on the face of the planet. :wink:

dirrrty
Apr 9th, 2008, 05:57 PM
mmm and the BSB sold like +120 million records... point?
call Britney a Legend if you want, but truth is she's a "Has Been"

How is she a "Has Been" ? She is still selling records, there is still loads of interest in her

I thought a "Has Been" was someone who has come and gone and no one has interest in no more

aleronihead
Apr 9th, 2008, 07:11 PM
You can't be serious. There's at least one thread every month on Christina's board that asks for people to buy her albums again. You act like Britney fans are the only ones who bought multiple copies. It happens with almost any fanbase. Way to be stereotypical again.
Where have you EVER seen a thread once a month on the Christina board enticing people to buy the album again? I've been reading that board for three years and I've never seen such a post.

My point is that Britney fans are fiercely loyal. I thought you'd take that as a compliment.

aleronihead
Apr 9th, 2008, 07:12 PM
Christina fans are the most hypocritical people on the face of the planet. :wink:
Oh can it, you're so self-righteous and catty. You don't post often, but when you do it's so snide.

tiger_rascal
Apr 9th, 2008, 07:47 PM
:arrow:

lush lola
Apr 10th, 2008, 06:59 AM
You are 100% crazy!

flavinha
Apr 10th, 2008, 08:14 AM
girls! damn! stop the fighting! and be happy :D

tiger_rascal
Apr 10th, 2008, 08:47 AM
Im happy! See? :crazy:

jade.
Apr 10th, 2008, 10:32 AM
Christina fans are the most hypocritical people on the face of the planet. :wink:
:laugh:

heavenwaits_22
Apr 10th, 2008, 12:00 PM
Where have you EVER seen a thread once a month on the Christina board enticing people to buy the album again? I've been reading that board for three years and I've never seen such a post.

My point is that Britney fans are fiercely loyal. I thought you'd take that as a compliment.lol :laugh: Once again you're just pushing it under the rug. I know because I've seen the threads. I've seen some where they ask "How many copies are you going to buy" "I have to get the cd again because I lost it, or it has a scratch." Come on now you can't literally think that only Britney fans do this. Everyone is guilty of it. Who cares really anyway? A sale is a sale.

aleronihead
Apr 10th, 2008, 12:56 PM
lol :laugh: Once again you're just pushing it under the rug. I know because I've seen the threads. I've seen some where they ask "How many copies are you going to buy" "I have to get the cd again because I lost it, or it has a scratch." Come on now you can't literally think that only Britney fans do this. Everyone is guilty of it. Who cares really anyway? A sale is a sale.
I genuinely think you imagined this. If you can find one of these threads, I'll eat my words, but I have NEVER seen such a lame thread on that board. Maybe an individual mention once in a great while, but never ever a recurring thread about getting people to buy extra copies. I think you're just arguing for the sake of arguing.

heavenwaits_22
Apr 10th, 2008, 01:53 PM
I genuinely think you imagined this. If you can find one of these threads, I'll eat my words, but I have NEVER seen such a lame thread on that board. Maybe an individual mention once in a great while, but never ever a recurring thread about getting people to buy extra copies. I think you're just arguing for the sake of arguing.omg lol I didn't make this up. That's just stupid. There have been threads asking how many copies did you buy. Every message board has threads like that. Maybe you just weren't around when those threads were made.

jimmyboy
Apr 10th, 2008, 05:07 PM
My Sig owns lives... And pop "legends"

Cubasterd
Apr 10th, 2008, 05:41 PM
Is this the same Kristina that I really disliked? lol

anyway.... you are right and everyone here knows it. To argue it only shows stale delusion.

MO-Xtina
Apr 10th, 2008, 07:05 PM
Musically she's not legendary at all. I'd say iconic. For someone of her fame her success has been pretty normal. Look at the Spice Girls or Nsync. They sold a lot of records too, but they're a thing of the past. Britney's headed down that path as well, if not already. She hasn't done anything remotely noteworthy musically since Toxic.

Do you honestly think she will come back and resurrect her tarnished career? I think it will be too little too late and unless she comes back with something completely revolutionary it will be the same schtick as always. People get tired of that. They already are, hence why her new album barely went double platinum worldwide.

heavenwaits_22
Apr 10th, 2008, 09:34 PM
Musically she's not legendary at all. I'd say iconic. For someone of her fame her success has been pretty normal. Look at the Spice Girls or Nsync. They sold a lot of records too, but they're a thing of the past. Britney's headed down that path as well, if not already. She hasn't done anything remotely noteworthy musically since Toxic.

Do you honestly think she will come back and resurrect her tarnished career? I think it will be too little too late and unless she comes back with something completely revolutionary it will be the same schtick as always. People get tired of that. They already are, hence why her new album barely went double platinum worldwide.so much fail with this post. Britney is double platinum worldwide in 6 months with no promotion. Christina barely made it to 4 million with promotion. N'sync are dead in fame, and success. Britney is still going strong regarding fame, and success. Without even having to promote herself, and her cd. How many stars in this business can do that? Not many.

Oh and go back to finding articles about Christina and bolding Britney's name. Doesn't it just irk you that a rehab star is still being thrown into Christina's boring articles to spice them up? Here comes your reply "but did you see what they wrote about Britney?" "They said she doesn't have the crown anymore, and she was in rehab."

Tell me do you think if Christina were to go on a sitcom television show that she would bring in the ratings? Britney single handedly saved a show from being canceled. Christina wouldn't be able to do that. She wouldn't have been able to play the part Britney played.

Fan4Life
Apr 10th, 2008, 09:36 PM
I don't like the girl, but to say her latest album wasn't successful because of the music is retarded. If she was skinny, hot, could still dance, and most importantly had a good public image, we all know Blackout would have sold truckloads.

ghettoguy
Apr 10th, 2008, 09:50 PM
Christina wouldn't be able to do that. She wouldn't have been able to play the part Britney played.
Christina on SNL >>>>>>>>>>> Britney's life.

Manuel
Apr 10th, 2008, 09:57 PM
:nod: :nod:^^^

tiger_rascal
Apr 10th, 2008, 10:11 PM
Christina on SNL >>>>>>>>>>> Britney's life.

nah.

Black Velvet
Apr 10th, 2008, 10:33 PM
Christina on SNL >>>>>>>>>>> Britney's life.

Britney as "Dawn Paslowsky"
Britney with Woodrow the homeless man (tracy morgan)
Britney inside Barbie's dream house
Britney's bouncing boobs monolouge
TWO TIMES hosting & multi appearances...

all called and said "hi"

heavenwaits_22
Apr 10th, 2008, 11:30 PM
^ All of which got more attention than Christina's career. :roll:

Industry producers are giving sitcom roles to Britney because of her acting in Will and Grace, and SNL.

MO-Xtina
Apr 10th, 2008, 11:37 PM
so much fail with this post. Britney is double platinum worldwide in 6 months with no promotion. Christina barely made it to 4 million with promotion. N'sync are dead in fame, and success. Britney is still going strong regarding fame, and success. Without even having to promote herself, and her cd. How many stars in this business can do that? Not many.

Oh and go back to finding articles about Christina and bolding Britney's name. Doesn't it just irk you that a rehab star is still being thrown into Christina's boring articles to spice them up? Here comes your reply "but did you see what they wrote about Britney?" "They said she doesn't have the crown anymore, and she was in rehab."

Tell me do you think if Christina were to go on a sitcom television show that she would bring in the ratings? Britney single handedly saved a show from being canceled. Christina wouldn't be able to do that. She wouldn't have been able to play the part Britney played.

How did Britney have no promotion? She performed at the VMA's, released 3 music videos and had radio airplay. Not to mention the fact that she was in the tabloids every single day - everyone knew she had an album out and they still didn't buy it.

Christina stopped promoting after Hurt because she went on a sold out world tour, which just so happened to be the biggest female tour of the year. Then she won another Grammy and had a baby. :love: I'm sure the least of her priorities list was appearing on a dumb sitcom that requires no acting talent whatsoever. Britney was featured for literally less than three minutes. You act like she's gonna win an oscar for that role or something. :laugh: Christina's working with the big ballers anyways. She was just asked to sing with the Rollingstones in Martin Scorscese's new documentart "Shine A Light" and she got rave reviews, by the way. Check for yourself.

http://talk.livedaily.com/showthread.php?t=618930

Kaina
Apr 10th, 2008, 11:48 PM
^ All of which got more attention than Christina's career. :roll:

Industry producers are giving sitcom roles to Britney because of her acting in Will and Grace, and SNL.
GET WELL SOON!!!:kiss:

NaturalTina
Apr 10th, 2008, 11:49 PM
^ All of which got more attention than Christina's career. :roll:

Industry producers are giving sitcom roles to Britney because of her acting in Will and Grace, and SNL.

People like you turn me off Britney so much.

Slayer4Xtina
Apr 11th, 2008, 02:47 AM
^ All of which got more attention than Christina's career. :roll:

Industry producers are giving sitcom roles to Britney because of her acting in Will and Grace, and SNL.

These got more attention than Christina's whole career! Sadly! :noway:

http://i29.tinypic.com/2dm5kdx.gif

http://i32.tinypic.com/2j4585f.jpg

jade.
Apr 11th, 2008, 03:23 AM
How did Britney have no promotion? She performed at the VMA's, released 3 music videos and had radio airplay. Not to mention the fact that she was in the tabloids every single day - everyone knew she had an album out and they still didn't buy it.

Christina stopped promoting after Hurt because she went on a sold out world tour, which just so happened to be the biggest female tour of the year. Then she won another Grammy and had a baby. :love: I'm sure the least of her priorities list was appearing on a dumb sitcom that requires no acting talent whatsoever. Britney was featured for literally less than three minutes. You act like she's gonna win an oscar for that role or something. :laugh: Christina's working with the big ballers anyways. She was just asked to sing with the Rollingstones in Martin Scorscese's new documentart "Shine A Light" and she got rave reviews, by the way. Check for yourself.

http://talk.livedaily.com/showthread.php?t=618930
ILU. :roll:

heavenwaits_22
Apr 11th, 2008, 03:35 AM
lmao You people scream that Christina didn't have enough promotion yet here you are thinking they had the same amount of promotion. You seem to be under the impression that every time Britney was in the tabloids they mentioned that she had an album out. Umm no.

If that were true Paris Hilton would've sold more than she did.

One performance, 3 videos, and minimal airplay. 2 multi-platinum selling singles, and another shaping up to be a gold selling single. 2 million albums sold in 6 months worldwide.

Compared to plenty of performances, 4-5 videos, a world tour, promotion worldwide, interviews, photo shoots, etc. 4 million worldwide, and what 1 platinum digital single. (I don't know how the Candyman, or Hurt did)

That's kinda sad.

©!nful
Apr 11th, 2008, 03:40 AM
I do think "iconic" is a better way to describe Britney than "legend". She's too young to be a legend right now, but she's definitely iconic, which is a big achievement all by itself.

jade.
Apr 11th, 2008, 03:59 AM
lmao You people scream that Christina didn't have enough promotion yet here you are thinking they had the same amount of promotion. You seem to be under the impression that every time Britney was in the tabloids they mentioned that she had an album out. Umm no.

If that were true Paris Hilton would've sold more than she did.

One performance, 3 videos, and minimal airplay. 2 multi-platinum selling singles, and another shaping up to be a gold selling single. 2 million albums sold in 6 months worldwide.

Compared to plenty of performances, 4-5 videos, a world tour, promotion worldwide, interviews, photo shoots, etc. 4 million worldwide, and what 1 platinum digital single. (I don't know how the Candyman, or Hurt did)

That's kinda sad.
Double albums don't always sell great, that's the part you seem to keep missing. Like you said in the other thread 'it's only a sale'. I think her touring is more important, her selling out most nights goes to show people are still interested in her. She sold 4 million with B2B because it was music that wasn't "in" at that moment & it didn't attract many, she sold 11-12 million with Stripped because it attracted alot more people & was overall better for today's music. There obviously is thousands who enjoy seeing her live & that's what matters for her name, the day people can call her a flop is the day she stops selling tickets.

heavenwaits_22
Apr 11th, 2008, 04:24 AM
Double albums don't always sell great, that's the part you seem to keep missing. Like you said in the other thread 'it's only a sale'. I think her touring is more important, her selling out most nights goes to show people are still interested in her. She sold 4 million with B2B because it was music that wasn't "in" at that moment & it didn't attract many, she sold 11-12 million with Stripped because it attracted alot more people & was overall better for today's music. There obviously is thousands who enjoy seeing her live & that's what matters for her name, the day people can call her a flop is the day she stops selling tickets.Stripped didn't sell 11-12. It at the most sold 10 million. That was back in 2002-2003 where sales weren't dropping like an b!tch.

heavenwaits_22
Apr 11th, 2008, 04:26 AM
Christina stopped promoting after Hurt because she went on a sold out world tour, which just so happened to be the biggest female tour of the year. Then she won another Grammy and had a baby. :love: I'm sure the least of her priorities list was appearing on a dumb sitcom that requires no acting talent whatsoever. Britney was featured for literally less than three minutes. You act like she's gonna win an oscar for that role or something. :laugh: Christina's working with the big ballers anyways. She was just asked to sing with the Rollingstones in Martin Scorscese's new documentart "Shine A Light" and she got rave reviews, by the way. Check for yourself.

http://talk.livedaily.com/showthread.php?t=618930
Oh and lmfao. Christina is in a documentary. She didn't act at all, and her part is 3 minutes also. No acting talent? That's funny because every single actor, Britney's reviews, the director, and producers all thought Britney did great, and some even said she did better than the actors on the show themselves.

ghettoguy
Apr 11th, 2008, 04:47 AM
Oh and lmfao. Christina is in a documentary. She didn't act at all, and her part is 3 minutes also. No acting talent? That's funny because every single actor, Britney's reviews, the director, and producers all thought Britney did great, and some even said she did better than the actors on the show themselves.
Yeah,It def. was her Oscar worthy moment. I can just see the Emmy buzz already.:eek:

heavenwaits_22
Apr 11th, 2008, 04:49 AM
Yeah,It def. was her Oscar worthy moment. I can just see the Emmy buzz already.:eek:lmao at you bringing that up. I never said anything about it.

But ET have already mentioned it, and so have the producers. Britney already has Emmy awards.

~Crybaby~
Apr 11th, 2008, 05:08 AM
Christina on SNL >>>>>>>>>>> Britney's life.

Yeah, Christina should put her talents to use on the big screen, seriously. Britney did a good job on the recent show though, she was actually funny and entertaining.

ghettoguy
Apr 11th, 2008, 05:14 AM
lmao at you bringing that up. I never said anything about it.

But ET have already mentioned it, and so have the producers. Britney already has Emmy awards.
Yeah,Crosswords was so epic. Let me tell you how that movie truly changed my life and inspired a new way of thinkinh for me. Truly,EPIC!:eek:

tiger_rascal
Apr 11th, 2008, 06:24 AM
Yeah,Crosswords was so epic.

Crosswords are hard. I can never do them. Im more of a circle-a-word or find a word kinda guy.

ghettoguy
Apr 11th, 2008, 06:26 AM
Crosswords are hard. I can never do them. Im more of a circle-a-word or find a word kinda guy.
Yeah,if it was a good movie,maybe I would have remembered the title. LMAO

tiger_rascal
Apr 11th, 2008, 06:29 AM
You were close. Oh so close. But you failed. Maybe next time. Typos suck!

~Crybaby~
Apr 11th, 2008, 06:42 AM
Yeah,if it was a good movie,maybe I would have remembered the title. LMAO

:laugh:

Cubasterd
Apr 11th, 2008, 07:24 AM
:laugh: Ya'll really need to grow up but its so funny seeing how much you guys are pissed that Britney is still on top after all this ****.lol
"Now ladies does that make you crrrrrrrrrrrrrry"

jimmyboy
Apr 11th, 2008, 07:35 AM
Britney doesn't **** on my idol at all :sunny: And I just don't like her because of her music :sunny: :sunny:

Read my sig!

aleronihead
Apr 11th, 2008, 08:26 AM
heavenwaits, you seem bring up Christina more often than anyone else here. Which isn't surprising I guess, considering you lurk the Christina board for ANY mention of Britney. I guess you thrive off the conflict, huh?

aleronihead
Apr 11th, 2008, 08:27 AM
I do think "iconic" is a better way to describe Britney than "legend". She's too young to be a legend right now, but she's definitely iconic, which is a big achievement all by itself.
This is one of the few sensical posts in here. I salute you :sunny:

dirrrty
Apr 11th, 2008, 08:28 AM
Double albums don't always sell great, that's the part you seem to keep missing. Like you said in the other thread 'it's only a sale'. I think her touring is more important, her selling out most nights goes to show people are still interested in her. She sold 4 million with B2B because it was music that wasn't "in" at that moment & it didn't attract many, she sold 11-12 million with Stripped because it attracted alot more people & was overall better for today's music. There obviously is thousands who enjoy seeing her live & that's what matters for her name, the day people can call her a flop is the day she stops selling tickets.

Why are you making excuses about the double album? If it was single disc and sold the same, you would have another excuse, the fact is B2B wasn't what people wanted from her. It sold a decent amount, she did promote it and she had a world tour to support it. It's stupid to compare her promo to Britney's.

Blackout had 1 terrible performance, 2 terrible videos and 1 ok. How on earth is that promo? If Britney came back with a brilliant VMA performance and performed on every show and sold 2 million, then i would say that is bad, but she has sold 2 million without doing any of that which i think is pretty good

If Christina didn't tour, had 2 awful videos and did 1 bad performance, would you really say she had enough promo? I doubt it

MO-Xtina
Apr 11th, 2008, 01:13 PM
Why are you making excuses about the double album? If it was single disc and sold the same, you would have another excuse, the fact is B2B wasn't what people wanted from her. It sold a decent amount, she did promote it and she had a world tour to support it. It's stupid to compare her promo to Britney's.

Blackout had 1 terrible performance, 2 terrible videos and 1 ok. How on earth is that promo? If Britney came back with a brilliant VMA performance and performed on every show and sold 2 million, then i would say that is bad, but she has sold 2 million without doing any of that which i think is pretty good

If Christina didn't tour, had 2 awful videos and did 1 bad performance, would you really say she had enough promo? I doubt it

You're a hypocrite. How are you gonna say she can't make excuses for B2B, yet you're doing the exact same thing with Blackout? Practice what you preach, sweetheart.

It doesn't matter how terrible Britney's videos were, it's still promotion. If she were such a legendary artist she wouldn't release horrible videos. Simple as that. Just proves that Britney has no artistic integrity and is nothing without people making her look good.

dirrrty
Apr 11th, 2008, 02:05 PM
How am i doing the same thing? i'm simply pointing out the difference

I didn't call Britney a legend, and i wouldn't say Britney is in any state to make brilliant videos, her behaviour has clearly shown that, but people seem to ignore that

kristina
Apr 11th, 2008, 05:23 PM
Would you people stfu about Christina? This has NOTHING to do with her.

kristina
Apr 11th, 2008, 05:26 PM
Is this the same Kristina that I really disliked? lol

anyway.... you are right and everyone here knows it. To argue it only shows stale delusion.
Say what!? :blueeek:

Did I talk to you on AIM before or something? YouTube? :scratch:

mordacis
Apr 13th, 2008, 09:59 AM
i didn´t think i´d post here again, but i happened to see, as usual, alot of digs on Christina...from both the usual ****-ups (hellawaits22, nexus, tiggr-rascal) and the fake-ass-gladly-banned gnome "peter pan".

A ****ING CHRISTINA-STAN MADE A THREAD CALLING BRITNEY A LEGEND AND YET YOU ALL OPEN YOUR MOUTHS AND LET YOUR FECES OUT! :crazy:

and britney is a legend btw,so is Stalin :nod: they´ve affected millions of lives! :sunny:

ÄLAJYN
Apr 13th, 2008, 10:13 AM
Oh and lmfao. Christina is in a documentary. She didn't act at all, and her part is 3 minutes also. No acting talent? That's funny because every single actor, Britney's reviews, the director, and producers all thought Britney did great, and some even said she did better than the actors on the show themselves.




They say she may get a spin-off show based off that :), so they(xtopher stans) opinions = trash

Cubasterd
Apr 13th, 2008, 10:17 AM
Say what!? :blueeek:

Did I talk to you on AIM before or something? YouTube? :scratch:

Maybe I'm thinking of someone else.lol I know there were two Kristinas running around here at one point haha. But the one I'm talking about gladly put in her sig that she had me on her ignore list. :hat:

lonely3
Apr 13th, 2008, 11:24 AM
Oh can it, you're so self-righteous and catty. You don't post often, but when you do it's so snide.

:music: :D


I'm just acting like you Christina fans.

heavenwaits_22
Apr 13th, 2008, 01:40 PM
They say she may get a spin-off show based off that :), so they(xtopher stans) opinions = trashYeah. Plus Tina Fey offered her a spot on 30 Rock. Britney is a legend. If she's such a has-been I doubt Tina Fey would want her on her show. She knows what Britney is capable of, and has only said nice things about her.

aleronihead
Apr 13th, 2008, 02:26 PM
:music: :D


I'm just acting like you Christina fans.
Way to generalize.

heavenwaits_22
Apr 13th, 2008, 07:31 PM
Way to generalize.lonely3 obviously means the same Christina fans who keep coming in here.

pop weasel
Apr 14th, 2008, 03:25 AM
In all fairness to Britney - people say 'oh she is looking for attention and loves the paps' but then you see this week, even the most minor incident like a non-car crash, results in it being one of the weeks most published stories worldwide - its just ridiculous. There is no way you can expect her to act normal under those conditions.

aleronihead
Apr 14th, 2008, 07:32 AM
lonely3 obviously means the same Christina fans who keep coming in here.
She said "you" meaning she lumped me into the statement, which shows she doesn't really pay attention. I may be a Christina fan, but I'm also a Britney fan and I make every effort to be objective about both.

Hemingway
Apr 14th, 2008, 10:35 AM
You're a hypocrite. How are you gonna say she can't make excuses for B2B, yet you're doing the exact same thing with Blackout? Practice what you preach, sweetheart.

It doesn't matter how terrible Britney's videos were, it's still promotion. If she were such a legendary artist she wouldn't release horrible videos. Simple as that. Just proves that Britney has no artistic integrity and is nothing without people making her look good.
:noway:
the girl was in and out of mental institutes and you are saying she has no 'artistic integrity' as if promoting her album should be a priority at that time. Really? :manson:

tiger_rascal
Apr 14th, 2008, 11:35 AM
Hi PiPi!!! Welcome back!!! :kiss:

heavenwaits_22
Apr 14th, 2008, 02:24 PM
:noway:
the girl was in and out of mental institutes and you are saying she has no 'artistic integrity' as if promoting her album should be a priority at that time. Really? :manson:Glad you're back. It was unjust that you were banned when others who come here daily to bash Britney aren't banned at all.

Hemingway
Apr 14th, 2008, 03:50 PM
thanks guys. Glad to be back! :)
I wish that MoXtina would get banned for trolling over here. His dillusional head never can give credit to anyone except Christina. He is so sad.

dirrrty
Apr 14th, 2008, 04:13 PM
Who mods the Britney boards?

tiger_rascal
Apr 14th, 2008, 04:34 PM
I wish I could help mod this forum.

I promise to be good. :angel:

lonely3
Apr 14th, 2008, 04:47 PM
Glad you're back. It was unjust that you were banned when others who come here daily to bash Britney aren't banned at all.

Yes, it's stupid.

jade.
Apr 14th, 2008, 05:36 PM
I'm sure Peter Pan wasn't just banned for posting here.

Cubasterd
Apr 14th, 2008, 06:41 PM
thanks guys. Glad to be back! :)
I wish that MoXtina would get banned for trolling over here. His dillusional head never can give credit to anyone except Christina. He is so sad.
LMAO. That is so true.lol
He's not on my ignore list but as soon as I see his name, I know to just skip over his delusional essays. :laugh:


BTW - Kristina, I might have gotten u mixed up with another one.