PDA

View Full Version : Was rooting for the Cards, but am not unhappy because.....


pinky
Feb 2nd, 2009, 08:41 AM
Roger Staubach said he wanted the Cards to win, for exactly ONE reason: The Cowboys and Steelers were tied for most Super Bowl wins, and he wanted it to stay that way.

So I'm not too upset about the Steelers win. :]

Stopanimalabuse
Feb 2nd, 2009, 10:22 AM
LOL You must really hate the Cowboys. I thought the Cardinals looked pathetic in that last play before the half. No reason at all Harrison should have scored. The Cardinals easily could have won the game if they had played better that play. The Steelers' secondary looked very mediocre at times, so it was the only reason the Cardinals were even in the game. As it is, it was a good game, but it didn't have anything close to Tyree's catch that puts it in the same category as last season's Super Bowl.

pinky
Feb 2nd, 2009, 10:32 AM
LOL You must really hate the Cowboys.
Ya think? ;)

The last play before the half looked like something Donovan McNabb would have thrown. There was no play there AT ALL, and Warner shouldn't have thrown it.

Stopanimalabuse
Feb 2nd, 2009, 10:53 AM
Ya think? ;)

The last play before the half looked like something Donovan McNabb would have thrown. There was no play there AT ALL, and Warner shouldn't have thrown it.

The issue to me was that they looked like the Detroit Lions trying to tackle him. It should have been 10-7 at the half and the result could have been very different. Also, the commercials are getting worse and worse. Nothing memorable to me at all. Not one commercial.

spitItOut39
Feb 3rd, 2009, 08:44 AM
The issue to me was that they looked like the Detroit Lions trying to tackle him. It should have been 10-7 at the half and the result could have been very different. Also, the commercials are getting worse and worse. Nothing memorable to me at all. Not one commercial.

I thought they played a very good game. The cards looked incredibly smaller than the steelers however. Damn those guys were HUGE! I don't watch commercials, but i did notice one where there were a bunch of people's avatars running around. The monster was really just a sweet girl. I liked that one but i don't even know what they were selling? Pepsi?:confused:

db44
Feb 4th, 2009, 09:36 AM
Ya think? ;)

The last play before the half looked like something Donovan McNabb would have thrown. There was no play there AT ALL, and Warner shouldn't have thrown it.

It was a trick defensive play, a good call by the Steelers. The thought, and Harrison's first movements, indicated he was bringing the rush. Instead he stayed back. It's a TD if Harrison was really blitzing.

pinky
Feb 4th, 2009, 09:41 AM
From where I sat, Warner didn't read the play very well, and threw into coverage.

db44
Feb 4th, 2009, 09:46 AM
He did, but after reading Harrison's non-blitz.

Just posted some Bruce pictures in the forum.

spitItOut39
Feb 5th, 2009, 08:38 AM
From where I sat, Warner didn't read the play very well, and threw into coverage.

Whatchu takin bout pinky? Warner killed...just not quite enough to be the biggest weeners of the super bowl:noway:

pinky
Feb 5th, 2009, 11:26 AM
Warner GOT killed on the last play of the first half.

db44
Feb 5th, 2009, 11:57 AM
Pinky's just talking about that one play I think, which she does have a point on. But as I said, he was drawn into throwing into that coverage.

spitItOut39
Feb 5th, 2009, 01:08 PM
Too bad he didn't have you guys to give him the HEAD'S UP b4 he made the play. ;( What about if we call someone who knows how to time travel and see if we can go back to that exact defining moment in super bowl history and tweak the last play of the first half?

Stopanimalabuse
Feb 7th, 2009, 09:05 AM
Did anyone else get local commercials at the end of the game like I did?