PDA

View Full Version : Jindal Admits Katrina Story Was False


Richard Tafoya
Feb 27th, 2009, 12:36 PM
TPM:
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/jindal_admits_katrina_story_was_false.php?ref=fp1

Remember that story Bobby Jindal told in his big speech Tuesday night -- about how during Katrina, he stood shoulder-to-shoulder with a local sheriff who was battling government red tape to try to rescue stranded victims?

...

Jindal had described being in the office of Sheriff Harry Lee "during Katrina," and hearing him yelling into the phone at a government bureaucrat who was refusing to let him send volunteer boats out to rescue stranded storm victims, because they didn't have the necessary permits. Jindal said he told Lee, "that's ridiculous," prompting Lee to tell the bureaucrat that the rescue effort would go ahead and he or she could arrest both Lee and Jindal.

But now, a Jindal spokeswoman has admitted (http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0209/Jindal_aide_Story_was_set_after_Katrina.html?showall) to Politico that in reality, Jindal overheard Lee talking about the episode to someone else by phone "days later." The spokeswoman said she thought Lee, who died in 2007, was being interviewed about the incident at the time.

This is no minor difference. Jindal's presence in Lee's office during the crisis itself was a key element of the story's intended appeal, putting him at the center of the action during the maelstrom. Just as important, Jindal implied that his support for the sheriff helped ensure the rescue went ahead. But it turns out Jindal wasn't there at the key moment, and played no role in making the rescue happen.

pinky
Feb 27th, 2009, 01:14 PM
Just one more Republican who didn't make it happen for Katrina victims. :rolleyes:

DoubleEdgeSword
Feb 27th, 2009, 01:25 PM
Oh for heaven sakes. When will these politicians learn?

db44
Feb 27th, 2009, 02:21 PM
I was wondering about Jindal when he started going off about the volcano monitoring... That it was wrong to spend $140M to protect people in a volitile area... Can we assume then that he was more than happy to reject any money to strengthen the levies, as unnecessary spending?