Weather Channel Climate Expert Wants Global Warming Skeptics Decertified

[Regis Philbin]

Nice to see that freedom of speech is alive and well in the scientific community. Reminds me of the old Soviet Union...


http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...a-88824bb8e528

Weather Channel Climate Expert Calls for Decertifying Global Warming Skeptics

January 17, 2007

Posted by Marc Morano 202-224-5762 marc_morano@epw.senate.gov (8:50pm ET)

The Weather Channel’s most prominent climatologist is advocating that broadcast meteorologists be stripped of their scientific certification if they express skepticism about predictions of manmade catastrophic global warming. This latest call to silence skeptics follows a year (2006) in which skeptics were compared to "Holocaust Deniers" and Nuremberg-style war crimes trials were advocated by several climate alarmists.

The Weather Channel’s (TWC) Heidi Cullen, who hosts the weekly global warming program "The Climate Code," is advocating that the American Meteorological Society (AMS) revoke their "Seal of Approval" for any television weatherman who expresses skepticism that human activity is creating a climate catastrophe.

"If a meteorologist can't speak to the fundamental science of climate change, then maybe the AMS shouldn't give them a Seal of Approval. Clearly, the AMS doesn't agree that global warming can be blamed on cyclical weather patterns," Cullen wrote in her December 21 weblog on the Weather Channel Website. This latest call to silence skeptics of manmade global warming has been the subject of discussion at the annual American Meteorological Society’s Annual conference in San Antonio Texas this week.

[Richard Tafoya]

I hear the "earth is flat" and "sun rotates around the earth" scientists are having a hard time as well.

[Richard Tafoya]

As for the writer of this, Mr. Mark Morano...

From Sourcewatch:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Marc_Morano

Marc Morano is communications director for the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. Morano works under Senator James Inhofe, majority chairman of the committee.

Morano is a former journalist with Cybercast News Service (owned by Media Research Center). CNS and Morano were the first source in May 2004 of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth claims against John Kerry in the 2004 presidential election [1] and in January 2006 of similar smears against Vietnam war veteran John Murtha.

Morano was "previously known as Rush Limbaugh's 'Man in Washington,' as reporter and producer for the Rush Limbaugh Television Show, as well as a former correspondent and producer for American Investigator, the nationally syndicated TV newsmagazine." [2]

He now issues pro-oil press releases for James Inhofe, the recipient of the second-highest lobbying cash pool from the oil industry and as such a paid denier of global warming. Seems like a natural transition.

[Regis Philbin]

http://www.jamesspann.com/wordpress/?p=650

“The Weather Channel” Mess


January 18, 2007, 5:45 pm | James Spann | Op/Ed

Well, well. Some “climate expert” on “The Weather Channel” wants to take away AMS certification from those of us who believe the recent “global warming” is a natural process. So much for “tolerance”, huh?

I have been in operational meteorology since 1978, and I know dozens and dozens of broadcast meteorologists all over the country. Our big job: look at a large volume of raw data and come up with a public weather forecast for the next seven days. I do not know of a single TV meteorologist who buys into the man-made global warming hype. I know there must be a few out there, but I can’t find them. Here are the basic facts you need to know:

*Billions of dollars of grant money is flowing into the pockets of those on the man-made global warming bandwagon. No man-made global warming, the money dries up. This is big money, make no mistake about it. Always follow the money trail and it tells a story. Even the lady at “The Weather Channel” probably gets paid good money for a prime time show on climate change. No man-made global warming, no show, and no salary. Nothing wrong with making money at all, but when money becomes the motivation for a scientific conclusion, then we have a problem. For many, global warming is a big cash grab.

*The climate of this planet has been changing since God put the planet here. It will always change, and the warming in the last 10 years is not much difference than the warming we saw in the 1930s and other decades. And, lets not forget we are at the end of the ice age in which ice covered most of North America and Northern Europe.

If you don’t like to listen to me, find another meteorologist with no tie to grant money for research on the subject. I would not listen to anyone that is a politician, a journalist, or someone in science who is generating revenue from this issue.

[Regis Philbin]

It's all about the money, baby. No "Global Warming", no cash.

Let's find someone, anyone, who isn't on the government-funded global warming research gravy train who believes this crap...

[Regis Philbin]

Originally Posted by Richard Tafoya

I hear the "earth is flat" and "sun rotates around the earth" scientists are having a hard time as well.

At that time, there was a "conscensus" of scientific experts who believed just that...They weren't on the government payroll, but the government would throw them in jail (or worse) if they didn't agree.

[pinky]

And yet, they were proven right, weren't they?

[Regis Philbin]

http://www.al.com/printer/printer.ss...650.xml&coll=2

Spann spawns cyber-storm

TV meteorologist disputes human role in global warming

Saturday, January 20, 2007

BOB CARLTON
News staff writer

James Spann is used to covering storms.

Not being in the middle of one.

But the ABC 33/40 meteorologist finds himself at the center of the global-warming controversy after the Internet site The Drudge Report posted a link to comments Spann made on his weather blog Thursday night.

"Everything kind of exploded," Spann said Friday. "Writing stuff like that is something I always do, but when Drudge links to it, it just brings the world to you all of a sudden."

All that controversy is over a cyber-disagreement Spann has with a climate scientist from The Weather Channel.

In essence, Spann does not believe that human activity is contributing to global warming and contends that "billions of dollars of grant money is flowing into the pockets of those on the man-made global warming bandwagon." Spann received so much traffic on his site that it was temporarily shut down Thursday night, he said.

"We have never been shut down with traffic before," he said. "During tornado outbreaks and hurricanes, we've been close, but we've never had a total shutdown or crash like this. It's kind of unprecedented."